A multicenter study investigating the molecular fingerprint of psychological resilience in breast cancer patients: study protocol of the SCAN-B resilience study

Ulrika Axelsson, Lisa Rydén, Per Johnsson, Patrik Edén, Johanna Månsson, Ingalill Rahm Hallberg, Carl A K Borrebaeck, Ulrika Axelsson, Lisa Rydén, Per Johnsson, Patrik Edén, Johanna Månsson, Ingalill Rahm Hallberg, Carl A K Borrebaeck

Abstract

Background: Individual patients differ in their psychological response when receiving a cancer diagnosis, in this case breast cancer. Given the same disease burden, some patients master the situation well, while others experience a great deal of stress, depression and lowered quality of life. Patients with high psychological resilience are likely to experience fewer stress reactions and better adapt to and manage the life threat and the demanding treatment that follows the diagnosis. If this phenomenon of mastering difficult situations is reflected also in biomolecular processes is not much studied, nor has its capacity for impacting the cancer prognosis been addressed. This project specifically aims, for the first time, to investigate how a breast cancer patient's psychological resilience is coupled to biomolecular parameters using advanced "omics" and, as a secondary aim, whether it relates to prognosis and quality of life one year after diagnosis.

Method: The study population consists of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients enrolled in the Sweden Cancerome Analysis Network - Breast (SCAN-B) at four hospitals in Sweden. At the time of cancer diagnosis, the patient fills out the standardized method to measure psychological resilience, the "Connor-Davidson Resilience scale" (CD-RISC), the quality of life measure SF-36, as well as providing social and socioeconomic variables. In addition, one blood sample is collected. At the one-year follow-up, the patient will be subjected to the same assessments, and we also collect information regarding smoking, exercise habits, and BMI, as well as patients' trust in the treatment and their satisfaction with the care and treatment.

Discussion: This explorative hypothesis-generating project will pave the way for larger validation studies, potentially leading to a standardized method of measuring psychological resilience as an important parameter in cancer care. Revealing the body-mind interaction, in terms of psychological resilience and quality of life, will herald the development of truly personalized psychosocial care and cancer intervention treatment strategies.

Trial registration: This is a retrospectively registered trial at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03430492 on February 6, 2018.

Keywords: Biomolecular parameters; Body and mind; Breast cancer; CD-RISC; Epigenetics; Psychological resilience; Quality of life; SF36.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee at Lund University (original study file no. 2009/658, the following amendments are also approved: 2010/383 (expansion of sites for SCAN-B, including Blekinge County Hospital, Central Hospital Växjö and Hallands Hospital Halmstad), 2012/58 (updated patient information for SCAN-B v3), 2015/277 (updated patient information for SCAN-B v4), 2015/522 (The SCAN-B Resilience study), 2017/875 (The SCAN-B Resilience study in Helsingborg) and 2017/88 (The one-year follow up of SCAN-B Resilience).). “The committee sees no ethical problems to approve the planned study with the condition that samples sent abroad should be returned to a Biobank in Sweden after conducting analyses and that the consent is signed by the person who provided the information”. All patients must give written informed consent to participate in the study. Participation in the SCAN-B Resilience study is voluntary, and the participants have the right at any time, without any reason, to cancel their attendance.

Not applicable.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The study has received governmental funding and has thus been peer-reviewed by the funding body VINNOVA.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Min JA, Yoon S, Lee CU, Chae JH, Lee C, Song KY, Kim TS. Psychological resilience contributes to low emotional distress in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2469–2476. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1807-6.
    1. Southwick SM, Vythilingam M, Charney DS. The psychobiology of depression and resilience to stress: implications for prevention and treatment. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:255–291. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.143948.
    1. Herrman H, Stewart DE, Diaz-Granados N, Berger EL, Jackson B, Yuen T. What is resilience? La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie. 2011;56:5.
    1. Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK, Antoni MH. Hostfactors and Cancer progression: Biobehavvioral signaling pathways and interventions. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4094–4099. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.9357.
    1. Lutgendorf SK, Lamkin DM, Jennings BB, et al. Biobehavioral influences on MMP expression in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:6839–6846. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0230.
    1. Moreno-Smith M, Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK. Impact of stress on cancer metastasis. Future Oncol. 2010;6:1863–1881. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.142.
    1. Lutgendorf SK, Andersen BL. Biobehavioral approaches to Cancer progression and survival: mechanisms and interventions. Am Psychol. 2015;70:186–197. doi: 10.1037/a0035730.
    1. Connor KM, Davidson JRT. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) Depress Anxiety. 2003;18:76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
    1. Connor KM, Davidson JRT, Lee L-C. Spirituality, resilience and anger in survivors of violen trauma: a community study. J Traumatic Stress. 2003;18:71–82.
    1. Craig A, Blumgart E, Tran Y. Resilience and stuttering: factors that protect people from the adversity of chronic stuttering. Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54:1485–1496. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0304).
    1. Ding Y, Bao LP, Xu H, Hallberg IR. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of sense of coherence scale in women with cervical cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21:1205–1214. doi: 10.1002/pon.2029.
    1. Saal LH, Vallon-Christersson J, Häkkinen J, Hegardt C, Grabau D, Winter C, Brueffer C, Tang MH, Reuterswärd C, Schulz R, Karlsson A, Ehinger A, Malina J, Manjer J, Malmberg M, Larsson C, Rydén L, Loman N, Borg Å. The Sweden Cancerome analysis network - breast (SCAN-B) initiative: a large-scale multicenter infrastructure towards implementation of breast cancer genomic analyses in the clinical routine. Genome Med. 2015;7(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0131-9.
    1. Rydén L, Loman N, Larsson C, Hegardt C, Vallon-Christersson J, Malmberg M, Lindman H, Ehinger A, Saal LH, Borg Å. Minimizing inequality in access to precision medicine in breast cancer by real-time population-based molecular analysis in the SCAN-B initiative. Br J Surg. 2018;105:e158–e168. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10741.
    1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36®): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36® health survey: I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumption, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Medical. 1995;41:1349–1358. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-Q.
    1. CDRISC The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale. . Accessed Feb 2018.
    1. Windle G, Bennet KM, Noyes J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.
    1. Smith-Osborne A, Bolton K. Assessing resilience: review of measures across the life course. J Evidence-Based Social Work. 2013;10:111–126. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2011.597305.
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Taft C. SF-36 health survey: Swedish manual and interpretation guide. 2002.
    1. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books; 1979. pp. 21–43.
    1. BIG3 Resarcproject. . Accessed Feb 2018.
    1. Green KT, Hayward LC, Williams AM, Mid-Atlantic Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center Workgroup et al. Examining the factor structure of the Connor-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) in a post-9/11 U.S. military veteran sample. Assessment. 2014;21:443–451. doi: 10.1177/1073191114524014.
    1. Roos JM. Ge extra stöd till ängsliga patienter. Onkologi i Sverige. 2016;2:32–35.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit