Solving the puzzle of chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation

Sabet W Hashim, Anthony J Rousou, Arnar Geirsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson, Sabet W Hashim, Anthony J Rousou, Arnar Geirsson, Sigurdur Ragnarsson

Abstract

Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation is a prevalent problem among patients following a myocardial infarction. Until recently, the pathophysiology was poorly understood, resulting in surgical strategies with suboptimal results and limited durability. The surgical approach has evolved from revascularization alone to an additional mitral valve procedure, replacement, or repair. When the valve was repaired, isolated annuloplasty was performed. The dilemma that surgeons had when repairing a mitral valve was which type of ring to use and what size. In all series with annuloplasty alone, the results were poor with very high recurrence rates. The primary feature of ischemic mitral regurgitation is a prolapse of the anterior leaflet at A3 +/- A2. This prolapse can be caused by fibrotic elongation of the papillary muscle supporting A3 +/- A2 or tethering of P3 by a ballooning posterior left ventricular wall. Using a technique that corrects this prolapse with Gore-Tex neochords, we have achieved excellent results with effective and durable correction of the ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Transesophageal echocardiogram showing a complex regurgitant jet in a patient with IMR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A: Mitral valve after insertion of annuloplasty ring demonstrating a Gore-tex neochord to A3 portion of anterior leaflet in a patient with IMR. B: Mitral valve following completion of ring annuloplasty and neochord to A3 showing even coaptation plane without prolapse.

References

    1. Borger MA, Alam A, Murphy PM, et al. Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation; repair, replace or rethink? Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:1153–1161.
    1. Mihaljevi T, Lam BK, Rajeswaran J, et al. Impact of mitral valve annuloplasty combined with revascularization in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(22):2191–2201.
    1. Lamas GA, Mitchell GF, Flaker GC, et al. Clinical significance of mitral rergurgitation after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:827–833.
    1. Hickey MS, Smith LR, Muhlbaier LH, et al. Current prognosis of ischemic mitral regurgitation: implications for future management. Circulation. 1988;78(Suppl 1):51–59.
    1. Tolis GA Jr., Korkolis DP, Kopf GS, et al. Revascularization alone (without mitral valve repair) suffices in patients with advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy and mild-to-moderate mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1476–1480.
    1. Duarte IG, Shen Y, MacDonald MJ, et al. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone: late results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:426–430.
    1. Aklog L, Filsoufi F, Flores KQ, et al. Does coronary artery bypass grafting alone correct moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation? Circulation. 2001;12(Suppl 1):68–75.
    1. Grossi EA, Goldberg JD, LaPietra A, et al. Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: comparison of long-term survival and complications. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1107–1124.
    1. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;122:1125–1141.
    1. Edmunds LH Jr. Ischemic mitral regurgitation. In: Edmunds LH Jr., editor. Cardiac surgery in the adult. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997. pp. 657–676.
    1. Al-Radi OO, Austin PC, Tu JV, et al. Mitral repair versus replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1260–1267.
    1. Milano CA, Daneshmand MA, Rankin JS, et al. Survival prognosis and surgical management of ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:735–744.
    1. Brazilai B, Gessler C, Perez JE, et al. Significance of Doppler-detected mitral regurgitation in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61:220–223.
    1. Levine RA, Hung J. Ischemic mitral regurgitation, the dynamic lesion: clues to the cure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(11):1929–1932.
    1. Gorman JH III, Jackson BM, Enomoto Y, et al. The effect of regional ischemia on mitral valve annular saddle shape. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:544–548.
    1. Mallidi HR, Pelletier MP, Lamb J, et al. Late outcomes in patients with uncorrected mild to moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:636–644.
    1. David TE, Uden DE, Strauss H. The importance of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1983;68(Suppl 2):76–82.
    1. David TE, Armstrong S, Sun Z. Left ventricular function after mitral valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(Suppl):175–180.
    1. Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Deeb GM, et al. Intermediate-term outcome of mitral reconstruction in cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:381–386.
    1. McGee EC, Gillinov AM, Blackstone EH, et al. Recurrent mitral regurgitation after annuloplasty for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:916–924.
    1. Roshanali F, Mandegar MH, Yousefnia MA, et al. A prospective study of predicting factors in ischemic mitral regurgitation recurrence after ring annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:745–749.
    1. Messas E, Guerro JL, Handschumacher MD, et al. A new therapeutic approach for ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2001;104:1958–1963.
    1. Kron IL, Green GR, Cope JT. Surgical relocation of the posterior papillary muscle in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:600–601.
    1. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery — the “French correction". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–337.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit