Effects of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ agonist aleglitazar on renal function in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes: a Phase IIb, randomized study

Luis Ruilope, Markolf Hanefeld, A Michael Lincoff, Giancarlo Viberti, Sylvie Meyer-Reigner, Nadejda Mudie, Dominika Wieczorek Kirk, Klas Malmberg, Matthias Herz, Luis Ruilope, Markolf Hanefeld, A Michael Lincoff, Giancarlo Viberti, Sylvie Meyer-Reigner, Nadejda Mudie, Dominika Wieczorek Kirk, Klas Malmberg, Matthias Herz

Abstract

Background: Type 2 diabetes is a major risk factor for chronic kidney disease, which substantially increases the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. This Phase IIb safety study (AleNephro) in patients with stage 3 chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes, evaluated the renal effects of aleglitazar, a balanced peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α/γ agonist.

Methods: Patients were randomized to 52 weeks' double-blind treatment with aleglitazar 150 μg/day (n=150) or pioglitazone 45 mg/day (n=152), followed by an 8-week off-treatment period. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority for the difference between aleglitazar and pioglitazone in percentage change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to end of follow-up. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate and lipid profiles at end of treatment.

Results: Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate change from baseline to end of follow-up was -2.7% (95% confidence interval: -7.7, 2.4) with aleglitazar versus -3.4% (95% confidence interval: -8.5, 1.7) with pioglitazone, establishing non-inferiority (0.77%; 95% confidence interval: -4.5, 6.0). Aleglitazar was associated with a 15% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate versus 5.4% with pioglitazone at end of treatment, which plateaued to 8 weeks and was not progressive. Superior improvements in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides, with similar effects on glycosylated hemoglobin were observed with aleglitazar versus pioglitazone. No major safety concerns were identified.

Conclusions: The primary endpoint in AleNephro was met, indicating that in stage 3 chronic kidney disease patients with type 2 diabetes, the decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate after 52 weeks' treatment with aleglitazar followed by 8 weeks off-treatment was reversible and comparable (non-inferior) to pioglitazone.

Trial registration: NCT01043029 January 5, 2010.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition and study populations. Safety analysis population: all patients who received at least one dose of the study drug. Full analysis population: all patients who received at least one dose of study drug, and had an evaluable baseline and at least one evaluable post-baseline measurement of serum creatinine. Completer population: all patients included in the full analysis population who completed 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. Per-protocol population: completers without major protocol violations (defined prior database lock and unblinding). * 140 patients on aleglitazar and 132 patients on pioglitazone included in the full analysis population had at least one follow-up measurement of serum creatinine ≥ 21 days after last treatment intake, and therefore were included in the primary analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
LS mean percentage change in eGFR. (A) Change from baseline over time (full analysis population). Last-observation-carried-forward principle was applied to missing values of continuous variables. eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; LS = least squares; EOT = end of treatment; EOF = end of follow-up. (B) Change from baseline over time, by eGFR strata (full analysis population). Last-observation-carried-forward principle was applied to missing values of continuous variables.
Figure 3
Figure 3
LS mean percentage change in eGFR from baseline at end of follow-up by analysis population. Circles = aleglitazar; squares = pioglitazone. LS mean change from baseline and ± 95% CI. Analysis of covariance of percentage change from baseline. Missing data imputed using last-observation-carried-forward principle applied only to follow-up measurements of serum creatinine ≥ 21 days after last treatment intake. CI = confidence interval; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; EOF = end of follow-up; EOT = end of treatment; LS = least squares. *Numbers reflect patients included in the full analysis population who had at least one follow-up measurement of serum creatinine ≥ 21 days after last treatment intake.
Figure 4
Figure 4
LS mean percentage change in UACR from baseline over time (patients with macroalbuminuria at baseline). Median baseline UACR values (interquartile range) were 75.4 mg/mmol (55.7–133.8) for aleglitazar (n = 21) and 89.6 mg/mmol (43.3–116.0) for pioglitazone (n = 27). Analysis on log-transformed scale, geometric means ratio expressed as percentage change. Patients analyzed at end of treatment (using last-observation-carried-forward principle): n = 20 for aleglitazar and 26 for pioglitazone, and at end of follow-up: n = 19 for aleglitazar and 25 for pioglitazone. LS = least squares; UACR = urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio.

References

    1. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention . National Diabetes Statistics Report. 2014.
    1. Leiter LA, Fitchett DH, Gilbert RE, Gupta M, Mancini GB, McFarlane PA, Ross R, Teoh H, Verma S, Anand S, Camelon K, Chow CM, Cox JL, Després JP, Genest J, Harris SB, Lau DC, Lewanczuk R, Liu PP, Lonn EM, McPherson R, Poirier P, Qaadri S, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Rabkin SW, Sharma AM, Steele AW, Stone JA, Tardif JC, Tobe S, et al. Identification and management of cardiometabolic risk in Canada: a position paper by the cardiometabolic risk working group (executive summary) Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.01.016.
    1. Beckman JA, Creager MA, Libby P. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management. JAMA. 2002;287:2570–2581. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.19.2570.
    1. Mazzone T, Chait A, Plutzky J. Cardiovascular disease risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: insights from mechanistic studies. Lancet. 2008;371:1800–1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60768-0.
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:580–591. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.
    1. Libby P. The forgotten majority: unfinished business in cardiovascular risk reduction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1225–1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.07.006.
    1. Dietz M, Mohr P, Kuhn B, Maerki HP, Hartman P, Ruf A, Benz J, Grether U, Wright MB. Comparative molecular profiling of the PPARalpha/gamma activator aleglitazar: PPAR selectivity, activity and interaction with cofactors. Chem Med Chem. 2012;7:1101–1111. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201100598.
    1. Hansen BC, Tigno XT, Benardeau A, Meyer M, Sebokova E, Mizrahi J. Effects of aleglitazar, a balanced dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha/gamma agonist on glycemic and lipid parameters in a primate model of the metabolic syndrome. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2011;10:7–14. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-7.
    1. Henry RR, Lincoff AM, Mudaliar S, Rabbia M, Chognot C, Herz M. Effect of the dual peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha/gamma agonist aleglitazar on risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes (SYNCHRONY): a phase II, randomised, dose-ranging study. Lancet. 2009;374:126–135. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60870-9.
    1. Herz M, Gaspari F, Perico N, Viberti G, Urbanowska T, Rabbia M, Kirk DW. Effects of high dose aleglitazar on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Cardiol. 2011;151:136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.08.037.
    1. Apperloo AJ, De Zeeuw D, De Jong PE. A short-term antihypertensive treatment-induced fall in glomerular filtration rate predicts long-term stability of renal function. Kidney Int. 1997;51:793–797. doi: 10.1038/ki.1997.111.
    1. Lincoff AM, Tardif JC, Schwartz GG, Nicholls SJ, Ryden L, Neal B, Malmberg K, Wedel H, Buse JB, Henry RR, Weichert A, Cannata R, Svensson A, Volz D, Grobbee DE, AleCardio Investigators Effect of Aleglitazar on Cardiovascular Outcomes After Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The AleCardio Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2014;311:1515–1525. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3321.
    1. Rigalleau V, Lasseur C, Perlemoine C, Barthe N, Raffaitin C, Liu C, Chauveau P, Baillet-Blanco L, Beauvieux MC, Combe C, Gin H. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in diabetic subjects: Cockcroft formula or modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation? Diabetes Care. 2005;28:838–843. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.4.838.
    1. Schneider CA, Ferrannini E, DeFronzo R, Schernthaner G, Yates J, Erdmann E. Effect of pioglitazone on cardiovascular outcome in diabetes and chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:182–187. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007060678.
    1. Perkins BA, Nelson RG, Ostrander BE, Blouch KL, Krolewski AS, Myers BD, Warram JH. Detection of renal function decline in patients with diabetes and normal or elevated GFR by serial measurements of serum cystatin C concentration: results of a 4-year follow-up study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1404–1412. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004100854.
    1. Fox CS, Larson MG, Leip EP, Meigs JB, Wilson PW, Levy D. Glycemic status and development of kidney disease: The Framingham Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:2436–2440. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.10.2436.
    1. Keech A, Simes RJ, Barter P, Best J, Scott R, Taskinen MR, Forder P, Pillai A, Davis T, Glasziou P, Drury P, Kesäniemi YA, Sullivan D, Hunt D, Colman P, d'Emden M, Whiting M, Ehnholm C, Laakso M, FIELD study investigators Effects of long-term fenofibrate therapy on cardiovascular events in 9795 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the FIELD study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:1849–1861. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67667-2.
    1. The ACCORD Study Group Effects of combination lipid therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1563–1574. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282.
    1. Davis TM, Ting R, Best JD, Donoghoe MW, Drury PL, Sullivan DR, Jenkins AJ, O'Connell RL, Whiting MJ, Glasziou PP, Simes RJ, Kesäniemi YA, Gebski VJ, Scott RS, Keech AC, Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes Study investigators Effects of fenofibrate on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) Study. Diabetologia. 2011;54:280–290. doi: 10.1007/s00125-010-1951-1.
    1. Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Verduijn M, Elliott EG, Dekker FW, Krediet RT. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and new CKD-EPI formulas in relation to GFR, age, and body size. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1003–1009. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06870909.
    1. Ting RD, Keech AC, Drury PL, Donoghoe MW, Hedley J, Jenkins AJ, Davis TM, Lehto S, Celermajer D, Simes RJ, Rajamani K, Stanton K, FIELD Study Investigators Benefits and safety of long-term fenofibrate therapy in people with type 2 diabetes and renal impairment: the FIELD study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:218–225. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1109.
    1. Vejakama P, Thakkinstian A, Lertrattananon D, Ingsathit A, Ngarmukos C, Attia J. Reno-protective effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade in type 2 diabetic patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetologia. 2012;55:566–578. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2398-8.
    1. Newaz MA, Ranganna K, Oyekan AO. Relationship between PPARalpha activation and NO on proximal tubular Na + transport in the rat. BMC Pharmacol. 2004;4:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2210-4-1.
    1. Zhou Y, Luo P, Chang HH, Huang H, Yang T, Dong Z, Wang CY, Wang MH. Clofibrate attenuates blood pressure and sodium retention in DOCA-salt hypertension. Kidney Int. 2008;74:1040–1048. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.300.
    1. Taal MW, Brenner BM. Renoprotective benefits of RAS inhibition: from ACEI to angiotensin II antagonists. Kidney Int. 2000;57:1803–1817. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00031.x.
    1. Dobre D, Lambers Heerspink HJ, De Zeeuw D. Reducing cardiovascular risk: protecting the kidney. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2009;11:F39–F46. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sup027.
    1. Brenner BM, Cooper ME, De Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861–869. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161.
    1. Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Clarke WR, Berl T, Pohl MA, Lewis JB, Ritz E, Atkins RC, Rohde R, Raz I. Renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with nephropathy due to type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851–860. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011303.
    1. Sarafidis PA, Stafylas PC, Georgianos PI, Saratzis AN, Lasaridis AN. Effect of thiazolidinediones on albuminuria and proteinuria in diabetes: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:835–847. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.11.013.
    1. Jin HM, Pan Y. Renoprotection provided by losartan in combination with pioglitazone is superior to renoprotection provided by losartan alone in patients with type 2 diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2007;30:203–211. doi: 10.1159/000104089.
    1. Mychaleckyj JC, Craven T, Nayak U, Buse J, Crouse JR, Elam A, Kirchner K, Lorber D, Marcovina S, Sivitz W, Sperl-Hillen J, Bonds DE, Ginsberg HN. Reversibility of fenofibrate therapy–induced renal function impairment in ACCORD type 2 diabetic participants. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1008–1014. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1811.
    1. Forsblom C, Hiukka A, Leinonen ES, Sundvall J, Groop PH, Taskinen MR. Effects of long-term fenofibrate treatment on markers of renal function in type 2 diabetes: the FIELD Helsinki substudy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:215–220. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0621.
    1. Xu Y, Schnorrer P, Proietto A, Kowalski G, Febbraio MA, Acha-Orbea H, Dickins RA, Villadangos JA. IL-10 controls cystatin C synthesis and blood concentration in response to inflammation through regulation of IFN regulatory factor 8 expression. J Immunol. 2011;186:3666–3673. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001934.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit