REGN1908-1909 monoclonal antibodies block Fel d 1 in cat allergic subjects: Translational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Mohamed A Kamal, Robert Dingman, Claire Q Wang, Ching-Ha Lai, Manoj Rajadhyaksha, Michelle DeVeaux, Jamie M Orengo, Allen Radin, John D Davis, Mohamed A Kamal, Robert Dingman, Claire Q Wang, Ching-Ha Lai, Manoj Rajadhyaksha, Michelle DeVeaux, Jamie M Orengo, Allen Radin, John D Davis

Abstract

REGN1908-1909, a 1:1 cocktail of two fully human IgG4 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), REGN1908 and REGN1909, is being evaluated for treatment of cat allergy. Both REGN1908 and REGN1909 bind to the dominant cat allergen, Fel d 1. Adults with cat allergy confirmed by skin prick test (SPT) were randomized to single subcutaneous administration of placebo (n = 6) or REGN1908-1909 at doses of 150 (n = 6), 300 (n = 6), or 600 mg (n = 6). Blood samples were taken at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis and exploratory evaluation of biomarkers (IgE and SPT). Safety was assessed. Drug concentration-time profiles in serum for ascending doses of REGN1908-1909 were consistent with linear PKs. Noncompartmental analysis showed that maximum concentration (Cmax ) and exposure increased proportionately with dose, with similar time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) for REGN1908 and REGN1909 (6.2 to 8.2 days across doses), and a longer terminal half-life for REGN1908 (~ 30 days) relative to REGN1909 (~ 21 days). Adverse events were not dose dependent; there were no dose-limiting toxicities. REGN1908-1909 is characterized by linear and dose-proportional kinetics of the two individual mAb components. A single 600 mg dose maintains total mAb mean concentrations in serum above the target (mean of ~ 10 mg/L) for 8-12 weeks. Maintaining this mean target concentration resulted in translational pharmacodynamic effects: maximal mast cell degranulation in a passive cutaneous anaphylaxis mouse model, and maintenance of clinical efficacy measured by Total Nasal Symptom Score in a previous proof-of-mechanism study.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01922661.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors are employees and stockholders of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, the sponsor of the study.

© 2021 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Concentration‐time curves of the monoclonal antibodies REGN1908 and REGN1909 in serum after a single subcutaneous dose of REGN1908‐1909 (1:1 cocktail of the two monoclonal antibodies). (a) REGN1908 linear scale. (b) REGN1908 log scale. (c) REGN1909 linear scale. (d) REGN1909 log scale. Concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 0.0780 mg/L) are imputed as LLOQ/2 = 0.0390 mg/L
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Monoclonal antibody concentrations in serum and their relationship to inhibition of mast cell degranulation inhibition induced by cat hair extract in a passive cutaneous anaphylaxis mouse model of IgE‐mediated early allergic response (immediate hypersensitivity). Mast cell degranulation is proportional to the amount of Evans blue recovered from the tissue. Panel a adapted with permission from Orengo et al. (licensed under CC BY 4.0.) ***p < 0.001 and *p < 0.05 versus placebo

References

    1. Salo PM, Arbes SJ, Renee J et al. Prevalence of allergic sensitization in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134:350‐359.
    1. van Ree R, van Leeuwen WA, Bulder I, Bond J, Aalberse RC. Purified natural and recombinant Fel d 1 and cat albumin in in vitro diagnostics for cat allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;104:1223‐1230.
    1. Gronlund H, Saarne T, Gafvelin G, van Hage M. The major cat allergen, Fel d 1, in diagnosis and therapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;151:265‐274.
    1. Wachholz PA, Durham SR. Mechanisms of immunotherapy: IgG revisited. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;4:313‐318.
    1. Jutel M, Jaeger L, Suck R, et al. Allergen‐specific immunotherapy with recombinant grass pollen allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:608‐613.
    1. Akdis CA, Akdis M. Mechanisms of allergen‐specific immunotherapy and immune tolerance to allergens. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8:17.
    1. Shamji MH, Durham SR. Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy for inhaled allergens and predictive biomarkers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:1485‐1498.
    1. Zuberbier T, Bachert C, Bousquet PJ, et al. GA(2) LEN/EAACI pocket guide for allergen‐specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergy. 2010;65:1525‐1530.
    1. Bousquet J, Pfaar O, Togias A, et al. 2019 ARIA Care pathways for allergen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2019;74:2087‐2102.
    1. Dhami S, Agarwal A. Does evidence support the use of cat allergen immunotherapy? Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;18:350‐355.
    1. Orengo JM, Radin AR, Kamat V et al. Treating cat allergy with monoclonal IgG antibodies that bind allergen and prevent IgE engagement. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1421.
    1. Shamji MH, Ljørring C, Francis JN, et al. Functional rather than immunoreactive levels of IgG4 correlate closely with clinical response to grass pollen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2012;67:217‐226.
    1. Shamji MH, Singh I, Layhadi JA et al. Passive immunotherapy with single‐dose of anti‐Fel d 1 monoclonal antibodies REGN1908‐1909 in cat allergen‐induced allergic rhinitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;204(1):23‐33.
    1. Cooke RA, Barnard JH, Hebald S, Stull A. Serological evidence of immunity with coexisting sensitization in a type of human allergy (Hay Fever). J Exp Med. 1935;62:733‐750.
    1. Gronlund H, Adedoyin J, Commins SP, Platts‐Mills TA, van Hage M. The carbohydrate galactose‐alpha‐1,3‐galactose is a major IgE‐binding epitope on cat IgA. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123:1189‐1191.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration & Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for Industry . Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials. 2007. . Accessed April 14, 2020.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research & Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) . Bioanalytical Method Validation. Guidance for Industry. 2018. . Accessed April 19, 2020.
    1. Dong JQ, Salinger DH, Endres CJ, et al. Quantitative prediction of human pharmacokinetics for monoclonal antibodies: retrospective analysis of monkey as a single species for first‐in‐human prediction. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2011;50:131‐142.
    1. Galli SJ, Tsai M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med. 2012;18:693‐704.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit