A time and motion study of subcutaneous versus intravenous trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer

Erwin De Cock, Xavier Pivot, Nik Hauser, Sunil Verma, Persefoni Kritikou, Douglas Millar, Ann Knoop, Erwin De Cock, Xavier Pivot, Nik Hauser, Sunil Verma, Persefoni Kritikou, Douglas Millar, Ann Knoop

Abstract

Within PrefHer (NCT01401166), patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) preferred subcutaneous (SC) over intravenous (IV) trastuzumab. We undertook a prospective, observational time and motion study to quantify patients' time in infusion chairs and active HCP time in PrefHer. Patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer received four adjuvant cycles of SC trastuzumab (600 mg fixed dose via SC single-use injection device [SID, Cohort 1] or SC handheld syringe [HHS, Cohort 2]) then four cycles of standard IV trastuzumab or the reverse sequence. Generic case report forms for IV and SC management, both in the treatment room and the drug preparation area, were tailored to reflect center practices. Patient chair time and active HCP time were recorded. We compared pooled Cohort 1 + 2 IV with Cohort 1 SC SID and Cohort 2 SC HHS mean times across eight countries and individually within them utilizing a random intercept generalized linear mixed-effects model. Per session, the SC SID saved a mean of 57 min of patient chair time versus IV (range across countries: 47-86; P < 0.0001); the SC HHS saved 55 min (40-81; P < 0.0001). Active HCP time was reduced by a mean of 13 min per session with the SC SID (range across countries: 4-16; P < 0.0001) and 17 min with the SC HHS (5-28; P < 0.0001) versus IV. SC trastuzumab, delivered via SID or HHS, saved patient chair and active HCP times versus IV infusion, supporting a transition to either SC method.

Keywords: Breast cancer; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; subcutaneous; time factors; trastuzumab.

© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient chair time per IV, SC SID, and SC HHS administration by (A) infusion/injection stage per session by country and pooled, (B) infusion versus injection duration only per session by country and pooled, (C) infusion versus injection over 18 cycles by country and pooled (adjusted for first versus subsequent infusions). HHS, handheld syringe; IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous; SID, single‐use injection device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Active HCP time in the treatment room and drug preparation area per session by country and pooled. HCP, healthcare professional; HHS, handheld syringe; IV, intravenous; SID, single‐use injection device.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Active HCP time by task per session using pooled results across all countries. SC SID and SC HHS pre‐medication administration time = 0.1 min/1%. HCP, healthcare professional; HHS, handheld syringe; IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous; SID, single‐use injection device.

References

    1. Ferlay, J. , Soerjomataram I., Ervik M., et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Available at (accessed 18 January 2016).
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network . 2016. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Breast Cancer. V1.2016. Available at (accessed 12 January 2016).
    1. Senkus, E. , Kyriakides S., Ohno S., et al. 2015. Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Ann. Oncol. 26:v8–30.
    1. Coates, A.S. , Winer E. P., Goldhirsch A., et al. 2015. Tailoring therapies—improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann. Oncol. 26:1533–1546.
    1. Ismael, G. , Hegg R., Muehlbauer S., et al. 2012. Subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive, clinical stage I‐III breast cancer (HannaH study): a phase 3, open‐label, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 13:869–878.
    1. Wynne, C. , Ellis‐Pegler R. B., Waaka D. S., et al. 2013. Comparative pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous trastuzumab administered via handheld syringe or proprietary single‐use injection device in healthy males. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 72:1079–1087.
    1. European Medicines Agency . Herceptin. Summary of product characteristics. Available at (18 January 2016).
    1. Pivot, X. , Gligorov J., Müller V., et al. 2013. Preference for subcutaneous or intravenous administration of trastuzumab in patients with HER2‐positive early breast cancer (PrefHer): an open‐label randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 14:962–970.
    1. Pivot, X. , Gligorov J., Müller V., et al. 2014. Patients’ preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2‐positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international, randomized, two‐cohort PrefHer study. Ann. Oncol. 25:1979–1987.
    1. Fallowfield, L. , Osborne S., Langridge C., Monson K., Kilkerr J., Jenkins V. et al. 2013. Reasons for patients’ preferences for subcutaneous or intravenous trastuzumab in the PrefHer study. Eur. J. Cancer 49:S385.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit