Expanding the 3 Wishes Project for compassionate end-of-life care: a qualitative evaluation of local adaptations

Meredith Vanstone, Thanh H Neville, Marilyn E Swinton, Marina Sadik, France J Clarke, Allana LeBlanc, Benjamin Tam, Alyson Takaoka, Neala Hoad, Jennifer Hancock, Sarah McMullen, Brenda Reeve, William Dechert, Orla M Smith, Gyan Sandhu, Julie Lockington, Deborah J Cook, Meredith Vanstone, Thanh H Neville, Marilyn E Swinton, Marina Sadik, France J Clarke, Allana LeBlanc, Benjamin Tam, Alyson Takaoka, Neala Hoad, Jennifer Hancock, Sarah McMullen, Brenda Reeve, William Dechert, Orla M Smith, Gyan Sandhu, Julie Lockington, Deborah J Cook

Abstract

Background: The 3 Wishes Project (3WP) is an end-of-life program that honors the dignity of dying patients by fostering meaningful connections among patients, families, and clinicians. Since 2013, it has become embedded in the culture of end-of-life care in over 20 ICUs across North America. The purpose of the current study is to describe the variation in implementation of 3WP across sites, in order to ascertain which factors facilitated multicenter implementation, which factors remain consistent across sites, and which may be adapted to suit local needs.

Methods: Using the methodology of qualitative description, we collected interview and focus group data from 85 clinicians who participated in the successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP in 9 ICUs. We describe the transition between different models of 3WP implementation, from core clinical program to the incorporation of various research activities. We describe various sources of financial and in-kind resources accessed to support the program.

Results: Beyond sharing a common goal of improving end-of-life care, sites varied considerably in organizational context, staff complement, and resources. Despite these differences, the program was successfully implemented at each site and eventually evolved from a clinical or research intervention to a general approach to end-of-life care. Key to this success was flexibility and the empowerment of frontline staff to tailor the program to address identified needs with available resources. This adaptability was fueled by cross-pollination of ideas within and outside of each site, resulting in the establishment of a network of like-minded individuals with a shared purpose.

Conclusions: The successful initiation and sustainment of 3WP relied on local adaptations to suit organizational needs and resources. The semi-structured nature of the program facilitated these adaptations, encouraged creative and important ways of relating within local clinical cultures, and reinforced the main tenet of the program: meaningful human connection at the end of life. Local adaptations also encouraged a team approach to care, supplementing the typical patient-clinician dyad by explicitly empowering the healthcare team to collectively recognize and respond to the needs of dying patients, families, and each other.

Trial registration: NCT04147169 , retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov on October 31, 2019.

Keywords: Empathy; End of life care; Intensive care unit; Program evaluation; Qualitative research.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Timeline of Site Participation. In this figure we display the time course associated with initiating the 3 Wishes Project in each of these participating institutions, and the transition from a research project and clinical program to a clinical program only

References

    1. Steinhauser KE, Christakis NA, Clipp EC, et al. Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2001;22:727–737. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00334-7.
    1. Kirchhoff KT, Walker L, Hutton A, et al. The vortex: families' experiences with death in the intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2002;11:200–209. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2002.11.3.200.
    1. DeSanto-Madeya S, Willis D, McLaughlin J, et al. Healing experience for family caregivers after an intensive care unit death. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001561.
    1. Steinhauser KE, Clipp EC, McNeilly M, et al. In search of a good death: observations of patients, families, and providers. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:825–832. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00011.
    1. Steinhauser KE, Voils CI, Bosworth H, et al. What constitutes quality of family experience at the end of life? Perspectives from family members of patients who died in the hospital. Palliat Support Care. 2015;13:945–952. doi: 10.1017/S1478951514000807.
    1. Centofanti J, Swinton M, Dionne J, et al. Resident reflections on end-of-life education: a mixed-methods study of the 3 wishes project. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010626.
    1. Cook D, Swinton M, Toledo F, et al. Personalizing death in the intensive care unit: the 3 wishes project: a mixed-methods study. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:271–279. doi: 10.7326/M15-0502.
    1. Neville TH, Agarwal N, Swinton M, et al. Improving end-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Clinician's experiences with the 3 wishes project. J Palliat Med. 2019;22(12):1561-67.
    1. Vanstone M, Neville TH, Clarke F, et al. Compassionate end-of-life care: mixed-methods multisite evaluation of the 3 wishes project. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(1):1-11. 10.7326/M19-2438.
    1. Swinton M, Giacomini M, Toledo F, et al. Experiences and expressions of spirituality at the end of life in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195:198–204. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201606-1102OC.
    1. Vanstone M, Toledo F, Clarke F, et al. Narrative medicine and death in the ICU: word clouds as a visual legacy. BMJ Support Palliat care. 2016;0:1-8. 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001179.
    1. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in nursing & health. 2000;23:334–340. doi: 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>;2-G.
    1. Crotty M. The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1998.
    1. Team WP. The 3 wishes project start up guide. Hamilton: McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton; 2017.
    1. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, et al. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870.
    1. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2014.
    1. Varpio L, Ajjawi R, Monrouxe LV, et al. Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Med Educ. 2017;51:40–50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124.
    1. Moore JE, Bumbarger BK, Cooper BR. Examining adaptations of evidence-based programs in natural contexts. J Prim Prev. 2013;34:147–161. doi: 10.1007/s10935-013-0303-6.
    1. Escoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Haardoerfer R, et al. A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implement Sci. 2018;13:125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0815-9.
    1. Berwick DM. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA. 2003;289:1969–1975. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1969.
    1. Takaoka A, Honarmand K, Vanstone M, et al. Organ donation at the end of life: experiences from the 3 wishes project. J Intensive Care Med. 2020;1-9. 10.1177/0885066619900125.
    1. Curtis JR, Shannon SE. Transcending the silos: toward an interdisciplinary approach to end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32:15-17.
    1. Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, et al. Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. Jama. 2011;306:2694–2703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1888.
    1. Ho A, Jameson K, Pavlish C. An exploratory study of interprofessional collaboration in end-of-life decision-making beyond palliative care settings. J Interprof Care. 2016;30:795–803. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1203765.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit