A staged approach to address youth unresponsive to initial obesity intervention: a randomized clinical trial

Katherine R Arlinghaus, Daniel P O'Connor, Tracey A Ledoux, Sheryl O Hughes, Craig A Johnston, Katherine R Arlinghaus, Daniel P O'Connor, Tracey A Ledoux, Sheryl O Hughes, Craig A Johnston

Abstract

Background/objective: Maintenance interventions inherently require BMI improvement to maintain. This overlooks individuals initially unresponsive to obesity interventions. Staged pediatric clinical treatment guidelines were adapted to the school setting to develop an escalated treatment option for individuals initially unresponsive. This staged randomized controlled trial examined differences between escalated treatment (Take CHARGE!) and a maintenance program (PE Planners). Take CHARGE was hypothesized to have greater improvements in BMI as a percentage of the 95th BMI Percentile (%BMIp95) than PE Planners.

Subjects/methods: From 2018 to 2020, 171 middle and high schoolers (BMI Percentile ≥ 85) were recruited from a Houston school district to participate in a staged obesity intervention in their physical education (PE) class. After receiving a semester-long intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) with established efficacy, all participants were randomized to Take CHARGE (n = 85) or PE Planners (n = 86). Take CHARGE escalated the behavioral treatment of obesity received in ILI with more frequent individual sessions, additional opportunities for parental and school staff involvement, and increased mentorship from trained college students. PE Planners allowed participants to decide how they wanted to be active in PE class. Mixed linear modeling examined %BMIp95 overtime between groups. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04362280).

Results: Participants were 13.63 ± 1.32 years old; 59% were female, and 85% were Hispanic. Among those initially unresponsive to ILI, Take CHARGE had significantly greater decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = -0.01, p < 0.01). Conversely, among those initially responsive, Take CHARGE had significantly smaller decreases in %BMIp95 than PE Planners (β = 0.02, p < 0.05). Intention-to-treat analysis had similar results.

Conclusions: Participant outcomes in semester two differed based on initial response. Individuals responsive to initial intervention were most likely to benefit from a maintenance intervention and those initially unresponsive benefited more from escalated treatment. This indicates the need for staged intervention protocols to better address obesity in the school setting.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participants' progress through each study phase.
Fig. 2. Overall changes in %BMIp95 considering…
Fig. 2. Overall changes in %BMIp95 considering response to ILI in the first semester.
%BMIp95 = BMI represented as a percentage of the 95th BMI Percentile.
Fig. 3. Proportion of participants responsive over…
Fig. 3. Proportion of participants responsive over the academic year.
Guidelines for response were adapted from American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines for childhood obesity treatment and are specifically outlined in Table 1 [16].

References

    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Lawman HG, Fryar CD, Kruszon-Moran D, Kit BK, et al. Trends in obesity prevalence among children and adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 through 2013-2014. JAMA. 2016;315:2292–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6361.
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Fakhouri TH, Hales CM, Fryar CD, Li X, et al. Prevalence of obesity among youths by household income and education level of head of household - United States 2011-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:186–9. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6706a3.
    1. Kropski JA, Keckley PH, Jensen GL. School-based obesity prevention programs: An evidence-based review. Obesity. 2008;16:1009–18. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.29.
    1. Zenzen W, Kridli S. Integrative review of school-based childhood obesity prevention programs. J Pediatr Health Care. 2009;23:242–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2008.04.008.
    1. Davidson JA, Kannel WB, Lopez-Candales A, Morales L, Moreno PR, Ovalle F, et al. Avoiding the looming Latino/Hispanic cardiovascular health crisis: a call to action. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2007;2:238–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-4564.2007.07534.x.
    1. Committee on Accelerating Progress in Obesity Prevention, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Accelerating progress in obesity prevention: Solving the weight of the nation. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012.
    1. Ho M, Garnett SP, Baur L, Burrows T, Stewart L, Neve M, et al. Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in child obesity: systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e1647–e1671. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1176.
    1. Al-Khudairy L, Loveman E, Colquitt JL, Mead E, Johnson RE, Fraser H, et al. Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;6:Cd012691.
    1. Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, Wilson RF, Weston C, Fawole O, et al. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:547–65. doi: 10.1111/obr.12277.
    1. Danielzik S, Pust S, Müller MJ. School‐based interventions to prevent overweight and obesity in prepubertal children: process and 4‐years outcome evaluation of the Kiel Obesity Prevention Study (KOPS) Acta Paediatr. 2007;96:19–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00165.x.
    1. Kafatos A, Manios Y, Moschandreas J. Health and nutrition education in primary schools of Crete: follow-up changes in body mass index and overweight status. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2005;59:1090–2. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602216.
    1. James J, Thomas P, Kerr D. Preventing childhood obesity: two year follow-up results from the Christchurch obesity prevention programme in schools (CHOPPS) BMJ. 2007;335:762. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39342.571806.55.
    1. Jurak G, Cooper A, Leskosek B, Kovac M. Long-term effects of 4-year longitudinal school-based physical activity intervention on the physical fitness of children and youth during 7-year followup assessment. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2013;21:190–5. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3823.
    1. Manios Y, Kafatos A. Health and nutrition education in primary schools in Crete: 10 years follow-up of serum lipids, physical activity and macronutrient intake. Br J Nutr. 2006;95:568–75. doi: 10.1079/BJN20051666.
    1. van der Heijden LB, Feskens EJM, Janse AJ. Maintenance interventions for overweight or obesity in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2018;19:798–809. doi: 10.1111/obr.12664.
    1. Jones RA, Sinn N, Campbell KJ, Hesketh K, Denney-Wilson E, Morgan PJ, et al. The importance of long-term follow-up in child and adolescent obesity prevention interventions. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6:178–81. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2011.575155.
    1. O’Connor EA, Evans CV, Burda BU, Walsh ES, Eder M, Lozano P. Screening for obesity and intervention for weight management in children and adolescents: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2017;317:2427–44. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0332.
    1. McBride CM, Bryan AD, Bray MS, Swan GE, Green ED. Health behavior change: can genomics improve behavioral adherence? Am J Public Health. 2012;102:401–5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300513.
    1. van Stralen MM, Yildirim M, te Velde SJ, Brug J, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJ. What works in school-based energy balance behaviour interventions and what does not? A systematic review of mediating mechanisms. Int J Obes. 2011;35:1251–65. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.68.
    1. Freedman DS, Lawman HG, Galuska DA, Goodman AB, Berenson GS. Tracking and variability in childhood levels of BMI: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Obesity. 2018;26:1197–202. doi: 10.1002/oby.22199.
    1. Arlinghaus KR, O'Connor DP, Ledoux TA, Hughes SO, Johnston CA. The role of early response in school-based obesity intervention. Obesity. 2020;29:177–83. doi: 10.1002/oby.23040.
    1. Barlow SE. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007;120:S164–S192. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C.
    1. Johnston CA, Tyler C, Fullerton G, Poston WSC, Haddock CK, McFarlin B, et al. Results of an intensive school-based weight loss program with overweight Mexican American children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;2:144–52. doi: 10.1080/17477160701305864.
    1. Johnston CA, Tyler C, McFarlin BK, Poston WSC, Haddock CK, Reeves R, et al. Weight loss in overweight Mexican American children: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1450–e1457. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3321.
    1. Johnston CA, Moreno JP. Development of a school-based obesity intervention for Mexican Americans. Clin Pract in Pediatr Psychol. 2014;2:116–30. doi: 10.1037/cpp0000061.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004;31:143–64. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
    1. Bandura A, editor. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
    1. Freedman DS, Berenson GS. Tracking of BMI z scores for severe obesity. Pediatrics. 2017;140:e20171072. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1072.
    1. Carels RA, Young KM, Hinman N, Gumble A, Koball A, Wagner Oehlhof M, et al. Stepped-care in obesity treatment: matching treatment intensity to participant performance. Eat Behav. 2012;13:112–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2012.01.002.
    1. Paixão C, Dias CM, Jorge R, Carraco EV, Yannakoulia M, de Zwann M, et al. Successful weight loss maintenance: a systematic review of weight control registries. Obes Rev. 2020;21:e13003. doi: 10.1111/obr.13003.
    1. Swift DL, McGee JE, Earnest CP, Carlisle E, Nygard M, Johannsen NM. The effects of exercise and physical activity on weight loss and maintenance. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;61:206–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.07.014.
    1. An R, Yan H, Shi X, Yang Y. Childhood obesity and school absenteeism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2017;18:1412–24. doi: 10.1111/obr.12599.
    1. Cardel MI, Atkinson MA, Taveras EM, Holm JC, Kelly AS. Obesity treatment among adolescents: a review of current evidence and future directions. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:609–17. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.0085.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit