A Comparison of Aromatherapy to Standard Care for Relief of PONV and PDNV in Ambulatory Surgical Patients
Lois M Stallings-Welden, Mary Doerner, Elizabeth Libby Ketchem, Laura Benkert, Susan Alka, Jonathan D Stallings, Lois M Stallings-Welden, Mary Doerner, Elizabeth Libby Ketchem, Laura Benkert, Susan Alka, Jonathan D Stallings
Abstract
Purpose: To determine effectiveness of aromatherapy (AT) compared with standard care (SC) for postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PONV/PDNV) in ambulatory surgical patients.
Design: Prospective randomized study.
Methods: Patients (n = 254) received either SC or AT for PONV and interviewed for effectiveness of PDNV. Machine learning methods (eight algorithms) were used to evaluate.
Finding: Of patients (64 of 221) that experienced PONV, 52% were in the AT group and 48% in the SC group. The majority were satisfied with treatment (timely, P = .60; effectiveness, P = .86). Of patients that experienced PDNV, treatment was 100% effective in the AT group and 67% in the SC group. The cforest algorithm was used to develop a model for predicting PONV with literature-based risk factors (0.69 area under the curve).
Conclusions: AT is an effective way to manage PONV/PDNV. Gender and age were the most important predictors of PONV.
Keywords: ambulatory surgical patients; aromatherapy; comfort theory; postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PONV/PDNV).
Copyright © 2016 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. All rights reserved.
Source: PubMed