Trends of caesarean section deliveries in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2018

Aaisha Amjad, Abeeha Imran, Nabeeha Shahram, Rubeena Zakar, Ahmed Usman, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Florian Fischer, Aaisha Amjad, Abeeha Imran, Nabeeha Shahram, Rubeena Zakar, Ahmed Usman, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Florian Fischer

Abstract

Background: Pakistan is among those countries where the number of caesarean section births has increased unusually in the past two decades. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to analyse the trend of caesarean section deliveries among child-bearing women (aged 15-49 years) in Pakistan and to identify maternal socio-demographic factors and pregnancy-related variables associated with the change in caesarean deliveries from 1990 to 2018.

Methods: Secondary data from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys (1990-2018) were analysed. The analysis of data was confined to child-bearing mothers. Sample sizes were 4029, 5721, 7461 and 8287 for the time periods of 1990-91, 2006-07, 2012-13 and 2017-18, respectively. Socio-demographic information of the mothers and pregnancy-related variables were taken as independent variables for the present study. The association between independent variables and caesarean deliveries was measured in terms of unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and adjusted OR (AOR).

Results: The percentages of the mothers who had at least one delivery during the 5 years prior to each survey who had caesarean deliveries increased continuously from 3.2% in 1990-91 to 19.6% in 2017-18. Results indicate that mothers over 24 years of age, located in Punjab, from the richest socio-economic class and living in urban areas were more likely to have delivered by caesarean section. Mothers with a first child in birth order and who had five and more children, as well as mothers who had more antenatal care visits and delivered babies in private hospitals showed a higher probability of caesarean section births.

Conclusions: The findings of the present study confirm the gradual upsurge in the percentage of mothers delivering by caesarean section during the past two decades in Pakistan. Against this backdrop, some measures need to be taken by health departments to regulate the number of caesarean deliveries. Awareness among women about pregnancy complications and elaborated details by gynaecologists about the medically indicated reasons for caesarean delivery are a few important steps in Pakistan that can help in reducing caesarean deliveries which are not medically indicated.

Keywords: Antenatal care visit; Caesarean delivery; Pregnancy complication; Vaginal birth.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

References

    1. Norheim OF, Jha P, Admasu K, Godal T, Hum RJ, Kruk ME, et al. Avoiding 40% of the premature deaths in each country, 2010–30: review of national mortality trends to help quantify the UN sustainable development goal for health. Lancet. 2015;385(9964):239–252. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61591-9.
    1. Bhutta ZA, Cabral S, Chan CW, Keenan WJ. Reducing maternal, newborn, and infant mortality globally: an integrated action agenda. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;119(Suppl. 1):S13–7.
    1. Liu S, Rusen ID, Joseph KS, Liston R, Kramer MS, Wen SW, et al. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2004;26(8):735–742. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)30645-4.
    1. Amjad A, Amjad U, Zakar R, Usman A, Zakar MZ, Fischer F. Factors associated with caesarean deliveries among child-bearing women in Pakistan: secondary analysis of data from the demographic and health survey, 2012–13. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:113.
    1. Niino Y. The increasing caesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends. 2018;5(4):139–150. doi: 10.5582/bst.2011.v5.4.139.
    1. Boatin AA, Schlotheuber A, Betran AP, Moller AB, Barros AJ, Boerma T, et al. Within country inequalities in caesarean section rates: observational study of 72 low- and middle-income countries. BMJ. 2018;360:k55. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k55.
    1. World Health Organization . WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
    1. Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, Esquivel MM, Uribe-Leitz T, Azad T, et al. Relationship between caesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2263–2270. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
    1. Althabe F, Sosa C, Belizán JM, Gibbons L, Jacquerioz F, Bergel E. Caesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study. Birth. 2006;33(4):270–277. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00118.x.
    1. Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The effect of caesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–1346. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.553695.
    1. Black M, Bhattacharya S, Philip S, Norman JE, McLernon DJ. Planned caesarean delivery at term and adverse outcomes in childhood health. JAMA. 2015;314(21):2271–2279. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.16176.
    1. Penna L, Arulkumaran S. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;82(3):399–409. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00217-0.
    1. Hildingsson I, Rådestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenström U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(6):618–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01393.x.
    1. Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective caesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29–30):489.
    1. Mumtaz S, Bahk J, Khang YH. Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: evidence from Pakistan demographic and health surveys, 1990-2013. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0186563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186563.
    1. Hafeez M, Yasin A, Badar N, Pasha MI, Akram N, Gulzar B. Prevalence and indications of caesarean section in a teaching hospital. JIMSA. 2014;27:15–16.
    1. Iftikhar T, Rizvi U, Ejaz L. Evaluation of causes of increasing caesarean section rate in tertiary care hospital. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll. 2010;1:1.
    1. Martinez PA. C-section boom: all about the $? 2013.
    1. Bayrambour H, Heaman M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of caesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2010;37(3):219–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00409.x.
    1. Carolan M, Davey M-A, Biro MA, Kealy M. Older maternal age and intervention in labor: a population-based study comparing older and younger first-time mothers in Victoria, Australia. Birth. 2011;38(1):24–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00439.x.
    1. Jahromi BN, Husseini Z. Pregnancy outcome at maternal age 40 and older. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;47(3):318–321. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60131-X.
    1. Hanif HM. Association between maternal age and pregnancy outcome: implications for the Pakistani society. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011;61:313–319.
    1. Lin HC, Sheen TC, Tang CH, Kao S. Association between maternal age and the likelihood of a caesarean section: a population-based multivariate logistic regression analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1178–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00506.x.
    1. Padmadas SS, Suresh KS, Nair SB, Anitha Kumari KR. Caesarean section delivery in Kerala, India: Evidence from National Family Health Survey. Soc Sci Medl Sci. 2000;519(4):511–512. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00491-8.
    1. Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and caesarean delivery rate – a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):1091–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.058.
    1. Dražančić A. Antenatal care in developing countries. What should be done? J Perinat Med. 2001;29(3):188–198. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2001.028.
    1. Walker DS, McCully L, Vest V. Evidence-based prenatal care visits: when less is more. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2001;46(3):146–151. doi: 10.1016/S1526-9523(01)00120-9.
    1. Majrooh MA, Hasnain S, Akram J, Siddiqui A, Memon ZA. Coverage and quality of antenatal care provided at primary health care facilities in the ‘Punjab’ province of ‘Pakistan’. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113390.
    1. Islam MT, Yoshimura Y. Rate of caesarean delivery at hospitals providing emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):40–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.07.021.
    1. Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):151–158. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00226-6.
    1. Ronsmans C, Holtz S, Stanton C. Socioeconomic differentials in caesarean rates in developing countries: a retrospective analysis. Lancet. 2006;368(9546):1516–1523. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69639-6.
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2.
    1. Singh P, Hashmi G, Swain PK. High prevalence of caesarean section births in private sector health facilities-analysis of district level household survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:613.
    1. Malloy MH, Rhoads GG, Schramm W, Land G. Increasing caesarean section rates in very low – birth weight infants: effect on outcome. JAMA. 2009;262(11):1475–1478. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430110065029.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit