Effects of -12° head-down tilt with and without elevated levels of CO2 on cognitive performance: the SPACECOT study
Mathias Basner, Jad Nasrini, Emanuel Hermosillo, Sarah McGuire, David F Dinges, Tyler M Moore, Ruben C Gur, Jörn Rittweger, Edwin Mulder, Martin Wittkowski, Dorit Donoviel, Brian Stevens, Eric M Bershad, SPACECOT Investigator Group, Mathias Basner, Jad Nasrini, Emanuel Hermosillo, Sarah McGuire, David F Dinges, Tyler M Moore, Ruben C Gur, Jörn Rittweger, Edwin Mulder, Martin Wittkowski, Dorit Donoviel, Brian Stevens, Eric M Bershad, SPACECOT Investigator Group
Abstract
Microgravity and elevated levels of CO2 are two common environmental stressors in spaceflight that may affect cognitive performance of astronauts. In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial (SPACECOT), 6 healthy males (mean ± SD age: 41 ± 5 yr) were exposed to 0.04% (ambient air) and 0.5% CO2 concentrations during 26.5-h periods of -12° head-down tilt (HDT) bed rest with a 1-wk washout period between exposures. Subjects performed the 10 tests of the Cognition Test Battery before and on average 0.1, 5.2, and 21.0 h after the initiation of HDT bed rest. HDT in ambient air induced a change in response strategy, with increased response speed (+0.19 SD; P = 0.0254) at the expense of accuracy (-0.19 SD; P = 0.2867), resulting in comparable cognitive efficiency. The observed effects were small and statistically significant for cognitive speed only. However, even small declines in accuracy can potentially cause errors during mission-critical tasks in spaceflight. Unexpectedly, exposure to 0.5% CO2 reversed the response strategy changes observed under HDT in ambient air. This was possibly related to hypercapnia-induced cerebrovascular reactivity that favors cortical regions in general and the frontal cortex in particular, or to the CNS arousing properties of mildly to moderately increased CO2 levels. There were no statistically significant time-in-CO2 effects for any cognitive outcome. The small sample size and the small effect sizes are major limitations of this study and its findings. The results should not be generalized beyond the group of investigated subjects until they are confirmed by adequately powered follow-up studies. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Simulating microgravity with exposure to 21 h of -12° head-down tilt bed rest caused a change in response strategy on a range of cognitive tests, with a statistically significant increase in response speed at the expense of accuracy. Cognitive efficiency was not affected. The observed speed-accuracy tradeoff was small but may nevertheless be important for mission-critical tasks in spaceflight. Importantly, the change in response strategy was reversed by increasing CO2 concentrations to 0.5%.
Keywords: CO2; cognition; microgravity; performance; spaceflight.
Source: PubMed