Ketamine and Attentional Bias Toward Emotional Faces: Dynamic Causal Modeling of Magnetoencephalographic Connectivity in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Jessica R Gilbert, Christina S Galiano, Allison C Nugent, Carlos A Zarate, Jessica R Gilbert, Christina S Galiano, Allison C Nugent, Carlos A Zarate

Abstract

The glutamatergic modulator ketamine rapidly reduces depressive symptoms in individuals with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (TRD) and bipolar disorder. While its underlying mechanism of antidepressant action is not fully understood, modulating glutamatergically-mediated connectivity appears to be a critical component moderating antidepressant response. This double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled study analyzed data from 19 drug-free individuals with TRD and 15 healthy volunteers who received a single intravenous infusion of ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg) as well as an intravenous infusion of saline placebo. Magnetoencephalographic recordings were collected prior to the first infusion and 6-9 h after both drug and placebo infusions. During scanning, participants completed an attentional dot probe task that included emotional faces. Antidepressant response was measured across time points using the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) was used to measure changes in parameter estimates of connectivity via a biophysical model that included realistic local neuronal architecture and receptor channel signaling, modeling connectivity between the early visual cortex, fusiform cortex, amygdala, and inferior frontal gyrus. Clinically, ketamine administration significantly reduced depressive symptoms in TRD participants. Within the model, ketamine administration led to faster gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) transmission in the early visual cortex, faster NMDA transmission in the fusiform cortex, and slower NMDA transmission in the amygdala. Ketamine administration also led to direct and indirect changes in local inhibition in the early visual cortex and inferior frontal gyrus and to indirect increases in cortical excitability within the amygdala. Finally, reductions in depressive symptoms in TRD participants post-ketamine were associated with faster α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) transmission and increases in gain control of spiny stellate cells in the early visual cortex. These findings provide additional support for the GABA and NMDA inhibition and disinhibition hypotheses of depression and support the role of AMPA throughput in ketamine's antidepressant effects. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00088699?term=NCT00088699&draw=2&rank=1, identifier NCT00088699.

Keywords: amygdala; dynamic causal modeling; ketamine; magnetoencephalography; major depressive disorder.

Conflict of interest statement

CZ is listed as a co-inventor on a patent for the use of ketamine in major depression and suicidal ideation; as a co-inventor on a patent for the use of (2R,6R) -hydroxynorketamine, (S)-dehydronorketamine, and other stereoisomeric dehydro and hydroxylated metabolites of (R,S)-ketamine metabolites in the treatment of depression and neuropathic pain; and as a co-inventor on a patent application for the use of (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine and (2S,6S)-hydroxynorketamine in the treatment of depression, anxiety, anhedonia, suicidal ideation, and post-traumatic stress disorders. He has assigned his patent rights to the U.S. government but will share a percentage of any royalties that may be received by the government. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Gilbert, Galiano, Nugent and Zarate.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Gamma power and dynamic causal modeling (DCM). (A) A network of regions showed robust increases in induced gamma power during the task. These included the bilateral early visual cortex, bilateral fusiform cortex, and bilateral inferior frontal gyrus. When directly testing the effect of infusion, higher induced gamma power was found in the left amygdala for the ketamine infusion. (B) The default CMM_NMDA model includes four distinct intrinsic (within region) cell layers: superficial pyramidal cells, spiny stellate cells, inhibitory interneurons, and deep pyramidal cells [adapted from Gilbert et al. (57)]. Intrinsic excitatory connections were mediated by α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors while intrinsic inhibitory connections were mediated by gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. Each cell population included a self-gain parameter that reflected precision for each cell type. Each receptor also included distinct time constants and dynamics in the model. Between regions, superficial pyramidal cells carry forward extrinsic signals to excitatory spiny stellate cells. Deep pyramidal cells carry backward extrinsic signals to both superficial pyramidal cells and inhibitory interneurons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Models of connectivity, winning model, and example model fits. (A) Two plausible models were constructed to account for message passing between the early visual cortex (EV), fusiform cortex (Fusi), amygdala (Amy), and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Model 1 included reciprocal forward and backward connections from the EV to the Fusi, from the Fusi to the Amy, and from the Amy to the IFG. Model 2 included a direct, reciprocal, forward and backward connection from the EV to the IFG. (B) Bayesian Model Selection (BMS) was used to adjudicate between models, demonstrating that Model 2, with fully interconnected feedforward and feedback connections between each region, had the greatest exceedance probability. RFX, random effects. (C) Example evoked responses (left) and model fits (right) for a healthy volunteer (HV, top) and participant with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (bottom).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Meaningful parameters showing group by drug interactions. The estimated log mean and variance of each meaningful (95% probability or greater) parameter are plotted for participants with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (left) and healthy volunteers (HV) (right) for: (A) the four receptor time constants showing group by drug interactions, and (B) the five intrinsic connectivity parameters showing group by drug interactions. IFG, inferior frontal gyrus, C, baseline/placebo sessions, K, ketamine session, ss, spiny stellate cells; ii, inhibitory interneurons; sp, superficial pyramidal cells; dp, deep pyramidal cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Parameter change and antidepressant response. Two parameters showed a significant association between change from baseline (B) to ketamine (K) sessions and associated changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores (B–K). ss, spiny stellate cells; AMPA, α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid.

References

    1. Bernard R, Kerman IA, Thompson RC, Jones EG, Bunney WE, Barchas JD, et al. . Altered expression of glutamate signaling, growth factor, and glia genes in the locus coeruleus of patients with major depression. Mol Psychiatry. (2011) 16:634–46. 10.1038/mp.2010.44
    1. Choudary PV, Molnar M, Evans SJ, Tomita H, Li JZ, Vawter MP, et al. . Altered cortical glutamatergic and GABAergic signal transmission with glial involvement in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2005) 102:15653–8. 10.1073/pnas.0507901102
    1. Luscher B, Shen Q, Sahir N. The GABAergic deficit hypothesis of major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. (2011) 16:383–406. 10.1038/mp.2010.120
    1. Eastwood SL, Harrison PJ. Markers of glutamate synaptic transmission and plasticity are increased in the anterior cingulate cortex in bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry. (2010) 67:1010–6. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.004
    1. Ohgi Y, Futamura T, Hashimoto K. Glutamate signaling in synaptogenesis and NMDA receptors as potential therapeutic targets for psychiatric disorders. Curr Mol Med. (2015) 15:206–21. 10.2174/1566524015666150330143008
    1. Zarate CA, Jr, Singh JB, Carlson PJ, Brutsche NE, Ameli R, Luckenbaugh DA, et al. . A randomized trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant major depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2006) 63:856–64. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.856
    1. Diazgranados N, Ibrahim L, Brutsche NE, Newberg A, Kronstein P, Khalife S, et al. . A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. (2010) 67:793–802. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.90
    1. Zanos P, Highland JN, Stewart BW, Georgiou P, Jenne CE, Lovett J, et al. . (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine exerts mGlu2 receptor-dependent antidepressant actions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2019) 116:6441–50. 10.1073/pnas.1819540116
    1. Murrough JW, Iosifescu DV, Chang LC, Al Jurdi RK, Green CE, Perez AM, et al. . Antidepressant efficacy of ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a two-site randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. (2013) 170:1134–42. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13030392
    1. Zarate CA, Jr, Brutsche NE, Ibrahim L, Franco-Chaves J, Diazgranados N, Cravchik A, et al. . Replication of ketamine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression: a randomized controlled add-on trial. Biol Psychiatry. (2012) 71:939–46. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.12.010
    1. Phillips JL, Norris S, Talbot J, Birmingham M, Hatchard T, Ortiz A, et al. . Single, repeated, and maintenance ketamine infusions for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. (2019) 176:401–9. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18070834
    1. Lumsden EW, Troppoli TA, Myers SJ, Zanos P, Aracava Y, Kehr J, et al. . Antidepressant-relevant concentrations of the ketamine metabolite (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine do not block NMDA receptor function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2019) 116:5160–9. 10.1073/pnas.1816071116
    1. Zanos P, Moaddel R, Morris PJ, Georgiou P, Fischell J, Elmer GI, et al. . NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolites. Nature. (2016) 533:481–6. 10.1038/nature17998
    1. Moghaddam B, Adams B, Verma A, Daly D. Activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by ketamine: a novel step in the pathway from NMDA receptor blockade to dopaminergic and cognitive disruptions associated with the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. (1997) 17:2921–7. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02921.1997
    1. Homayoun H, Moghaddam B. NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:11496–500. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2213-07.2007
    1. Duman RS, Sanacora G, Krystal JH. Altered connectivity in depression: GABA and glutamate neurotransmitter deficits and reversal by novel treatments. Neuron. (2019) 102:75–90. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.03.013
    1. Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, Banasr M, Dwyer JM, Iwata M, et al. . mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science. (2010) 329:959–64. 10.1126/science.1190287
    1. Li N, Liu RJ, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Lee B, Son H, et al. . Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry. (2011) 69:754–61. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.015
    1. Liu RJ, Lee FS, Li XY, Bambico F, Duman RS, Aghajanian GK. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met allele impairs basal and ketamine-stimulated synaptogenesis in prefrontal cortex. Biol Psychiatry. (2012) 71:996–1005. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.030
    1. Autry AE, Adachi M, Nosyreva E, Na ES, Los MF, Cheng P-f, et al. . NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responses. Nature. (2011) 475:91–5. 10.1038/nature10130
    1. Monteggia LM, Gideons E, Kavalali ET. The role of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase in rapid antidepressant action of ketamine. Biol Psychiatry. (2013) 73:1199–203. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.006
    1. Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. Targeting homeostatic synaptic plasticity for treatment of mood disorders. Neuron. (2020) 106:715–26. 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.05.015
    1. Miller OH, Yang L, Wang C-C, Hargroder EA, Zhang Y, Delpire E, et al. . GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors regulate depression-like behavior and are critical for the rapid antidepressant actions of ketamine. eLife. (2014) 3:e03581. 10.7554/eLife.03581
    1. Fogaça MV, Duman RS. Cortical GABAergic dysfunction in stress and depression: new insights for therapeutic interventions. Front Cell Neurosci. (2019) 13:87. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00087
    1. Godfrey KEM, Gardner AC, Kwon S, Chea W, Muthukumaraswamy SD. Differences in excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitter levels between depressed patients and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychiatr Res. (2018) 105:33–44. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.08.015
    1. Widman AJ, McMahon LL. Disinhibition of CA1 pyramidal cells by low-dose ketamine and other antagonists with rapid antidepressant efficacy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2018) 115:E3007–16. 10.1073/pnas.1718883115
    1. Economo MN, White JA. Membrane properties and the balance between excitation and inhibition control gamma-frequency oscillations arising from feedback inhibition. PLoS Comput Biol. (2012) 8:e1002354. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002354
    1. Ray S, Maunsell JHR. Do gamma oscillations play a role in cerebral cortex? Trends Cogn Sci. (2015) 19:78–85. 10.1016/j.tics.2014.12.002
    1. Buzsáki G, Wang X-J. Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Ann Rev Neurosci. (2012) 35:203–25. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444
    1. Muthukumaraswamy SD, Shaw AD, Jackson LE, Hall J, Moran R, Saxena N. Evidence that subanesthetic doses of ketamine cause sustained disruptions of NMDA and AMPA-mediated frontoparietal connectivity in humans. J Neurosci. (2015) 35:11694–706. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0903-15.2015
    1. Shaw AD, Saxena N, Hall JE, Singh KD, Muthukumaraswamy SD. Ketamine amplifies induced gamma frequency oscillations in the human cerebral cortex. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. (2015) 25:1136–46. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.04.012
    1. Cornwell BR, Salvadore G, Furey M, Marquardt CA, Brutsche NE, Grillon C, et al. . Synaptic potentiation is critical for rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression. Biol Psychiatry. (2012) 72:555–61. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.03.029
    1. Sanacora G, Smith MA, Pathak S, Su HL, Boeijinga PH, McCarthy DJ, et al. . Lanicemine: a low-trapping NMDA channel blocker produces sustained antidepressant efficacy with minimal psychotomimetic adverse effects. Mol Psychiatry. (2014) 19:978–85. 10.1038/mp.2013.130
    1. Nugent AC, Ballard ED, Gould TD, Park LT, Moaddel R, Brutsche NE, et al. . Ketamine has distinct electrophysiological and behavioral effects in depressed and healthy subjects. Mol Psychiatry. (2019) 24:1040–52. 10.1038/s41380-018-0028-2
    1. Nugent AC, Wills KE, Gilbert JR, Zarate CA. Synaptic potentiation and rapid antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant major depression: a replication study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. (2019) 283:64–6. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2018.09.001
    1. Dalgleish T, Watts FN. Biases of attention and memory in disorders of anxiety and depression. Clin Psychol Rev. (1990) 10:589–604. 10.1016/0272-7358(90)90098-U
    1. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive approaches to emotion and dmotional disorders. Ann Rev Psychol. (1994) 45:25–50. 10.1146/annurev.ps.45.020194.000325
    1. Gotlib IH, Krasnoperova E, Yue DN, Joormann J. Attentional biases for negative interpersonal stimuli in clinical depression. J Abnorm Psychol. (2004) 113:127–35. 10.1037/0021-843X.113.1.121
    1. Joormann J, Gotlib IH. Selective attention to emotional faces following recovery from depression. J Abnorm Psychol. (2007) 116:80–5. 10.1037/0021-843X.116.1.80
    1. Ma Y. Neuropsychological mechanism underlying antidepressant effect: a systematic meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. (2015) 20:311–9. 10.1038/mp.2014.24
    1. Peckham AD, McHugh RK, Otto MW. A meta-analysis of the magnitude of biased attention in depression. Depress Anxiety. (2010) 27:1135–42. 10.1002/da.20755
    1. Amico F, Carballedo A, Lisiecka D, Fagan AJ, Boyle G, Frodl T. Functional anomalies in healthy individuals with a first degree family history of major depressive disorder. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. (2012) 2:1. 10.1186/2045-5380-2-1
    1. Reed JL, Nugent AC, Furey ML, Szczepanik JE, Evans JW, Zarate CA. Ketamine normalizes brain activity during emotionally valenced attentional processing in depression. NeuroImage Clin. (2018) 20:92–101. 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.07.006
    1. Hu B, Rao J, Li X, Cao T, Li J, Majoe D, et al. . Emotion regulating attentional control abnormalities in major depressive disorder: an event-related potential study. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:13530. 10.1038/s41598-017-13626-3
    1. Ironside M, O'Shea J, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. Frontal cortex stimulation reduces vigilance to threat: implications for the treatment of depression and anxiety. Biol Psychiatry. (2016) 79:823–30. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.06.012
    1. Moran RJ, Symmonds M, Stephan KE, Friston KJ, Dolan RJ. An in vivo assay of synaptic function mediating human cognition. Curr Biol. (2011) 21:1320–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.053
    1. Gilbert JR, Zarate CA. Electrophysiological biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: gamma power and long-term potentiation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2020) 189:172856. 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172856
    1. American Psychiatric Association . 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psyciatric Association; (1994).
    1. Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. (1979) 134:382–9. 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
    1. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JB. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute; (2002).
    1. Hong LE, Summerfelt A, Buchanan RW, O'Donnell P, Thaker GK, Weiler MA, et al. . Gamma and delta neural oscillations and association with clinical symptoms under subanesthetic ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2010) 35:632–40. 10.1038/npp.2009.168
    1. Lazarewicz MT, Ehrlichman RS, Maxwell CR, Gandal MJ, Finkel LH, Siegel SJ. Ketamine modulates theta and gamma oscillations. J Cogn Neurosci. (2010) 22:1452–64. 10.1162/jocn.2009.21305
    1. David O, Kiebel SJ, Harrison LM, Mattout J, Kilner JM, Friston KJ. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG. NeuroImage. (2006) 30:1255–72. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.045
    1. Symmonds M, Moran CH, Leite MI, Buckley C, Irani SR, Stephan KE, et al. . Ion channels in EEG: isolating channel dysfunction in NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis. Brain. (2018) 141:1691–702. 10.1093/brain/awy107
    1. Moran RJ, Jones MW, Blockeel AJ, Adams RA, Stephan KE, Friston KJ. Losing control under ketamine: suppressed cortico-hippocampal drive following acute ketamine in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. (2015) 40:268–77. 10.1038/npp.2014.184
    1. Gilbert JR, Yarrington JS, Wills KE, Nugent AC, Zarate CA, Jr. Glutamatergic signaling drives ketamine-mediated response in depression: evidence from dynamic causal modeling. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. (2018) 21:740–7. 10.1093/ijnp/pyy041
    1. Gilbert JR, Ballard ED, Galiano CS, Nugent AC, Zarate CA. Magnetoencephalographic correlates of suicidal ideation in major depression. Biol Psychiatr. (2020) 5:354–63. 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.11.011
    1. Kveraga K, Boshyan J, Bar M. Magnocellular projections as the trigger of top-down facilitation in recognition. J Neurosci. (2007) 27:13232–40. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-07.2007
    1. Gilbert JR, Moran RJ. Inputs to prefrontal cortex support visual recognition in the aging brain. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:31943. 10.1038/srep31943
    1. Hochstein S, Ahissar M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron. (2002) 36:791–804. 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01091-7
    1. Friston K, Mattout J, Trujillo-Barreto N, Ashburner J, Penny W. Variational free energy and the Laplace approximation. Neuroimage. (2007) 34:220–34. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.08.035
    1. Friston KJ, Litvak V, Oswal A, Razi A, Stephan KE, van Wijk BCM, et al. . Bayesian model reduction and empirical Bayes for group (DCM) studies. Neuroimage. (2016) 128:413–31. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.015
    1. Drevets W, Videen T, Price J, Preskorn S, Carmichael S, Raichle M. A functional anatomical study of unipolar depression. J Neurosci. (1992) 12:3628–41. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-09-03628.1992
    1. Shaw AD, Muthukumaraswamy SD, Saxena N, Sumner RL, Adams NE, Moran RJ, et al. . Generative modelling of the thalamo-cortical circuit mechanisms underlying the neurophysiological effects of ketamine. NeuroImage. (2020) 221:117189. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117189

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit