A biopsychosocial model based on negative feedback and control

Timothy A Carey, Warren Mansell, Sara J Tai, Timothy A Carey, Warren Mansell, Sara J Tai

Abstract

Although the biopsychosocial model has been a popular topic of discussion for over four decades it has not had the traction in fields of research that might be expected of such an intuitively appealing idea. One reason for this might be the absence of an identified mechanism or a functional architecture that is authentically biopsychosocial. What is needed is a robust mechanism that is equally important to biochemical processes as it is to psychological and social processes. Negative feedback may be the mechanism that is required. Negative feedback has been implicated in the regulation of neurotransmitters as well as important psychological and social processes such as emotional regulation and the relationship between a psychotherapist and a client. Moreover, negative feedback is purported to also govern the activity of all other organisms as well as humans. Perceptual Control Theory (PCT) describes the way in which negative feedback establishes control at increasing levels of perceptual complexity. Thus, PCT may be the first biopsychosocial model to be articulated in functional terms. In this paper we outline the working model of PCT and explain how PCT provides an embodied hierarchical neural architecture that utilizes negative feedback to control physiological, psychological, and social variables. PCT has major implications for both research and practice and, importantly, provides a guide by which fields of research that are currently separated may be integrated to bring about substantial progress in understanding the way in which the brain alters, and is altered by, its behavioral and environmental context.

Keywords: biopsychosocial model; control; control system; mechanism; negative feedback.

References

    1. Aguinis H., Gottfredson R. K., Joo H. (2012). Delivering effective performance feedback: the strengths-based approach. Bus. Horiz. 55, 105–111 10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004
    1. Ashby W. R. (1948). Journal 11, 2512–2524 Retrieved on 30 January 2014 from
    1. Barrett L. (2011). Beyond the Brain: How Body and Environment Shape Animal and Human Minds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
    1. Berntson G. G., Cacioppo J. T. (2007). “Integrative physiology: homeostasis, allostasis and the orchestration of systemic physiology,” in Handbook of Psychophysiology. 3rd Edn., eds Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G., Berntson G. G. (New York: Cambridge University Press; ), 433–452
    1. Bourbon W. T. (1995). “Perceptual control theory,” in Comparative Approaches to Cognitive Science, eds Roitblat H. L., Meyer J.-A. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; ), 151–172
    1. Branco T., Staras K. (2009). The probability of neurotransmitter release: variability and feedback control at single synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 373–383 10.1038/nrn2634
    1. Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G., Sheridan J. F., McClintock M. K. (2000). Multilevel integrative analyses of human behavior: social neuroscience and the complementing nature of social and biological approaches. Psychol. Bull. 126, 829–843 10.1037//0033-2909.126.6.829
    1. Carey T. A. (2008). Conflict, as the Achilles heel of perceptual control, offers a unifying approach to the formulation of psychological problems. Couns. Psychology Rev. 23, 5–16
    1. Carey T. A. (2012). Control in the Classroom: An Adventure in Learning and Achievement. Hayward, CA: Living Control Systems
    1. Carey T. A. (2013). Mental health: integration is the key to the revolution. Lancet 382, 1403–1404 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62214-x
    1. Carey T. A., Kelly R. E., Mansell W., Tai S. J. (2012). What’s therapeutic about the therapeutic relationship? A hypothesis for practice informed by perceptual control theory. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 5, 47–59 10.1017/s1754470x12000037
    1. Carpenter R. H. (2004). Homeostasis: a plea for a unified approach. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 28, 180–187 10.1152/advan.00012.2004
    1. Carver C. S., Scheier M. F. (2001). On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    1. de Montigny C., Chaput Y., Blier P. (1990). Modification of serotonergic neuron properties by long-term treatment with serotonin reuptake blockers. J. Clin. Psychi. 51(Suppl. B), 4–8
    1. Cziko G. (2000). The Things We Do: Using the Lessons of Bernard and Darwin to Understand the What, Why and How of Our Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    1. Emmons R. A., King L. A. (1988). Conflict among personal strivings: immediate and long-term implications for psychological and physical wellbeing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1040–1048 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1040
    1. Engel G. L. (1980). The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. Am. J. Psychiatry 137, 535–544
    1. Epstein R. M., Borrell-Carrio F. (2005). The biopsychosocial model: exploring six impossible things. Fam. Syst. Health 23, 426–431
    1. Estes W. K., Skinner B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. J. Exp. Psychol. 29, 390–400 10.1037/h0062283
    1. Henrich J., Heine S. J., Norenzayan A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–135 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
    1. Hofmann S. G., Smits J. A. J., Asnaani A., Gutner C. A., Otto M. W. (2011). Cognitive enhancers for anxiety disorders. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 99, 275–284 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.11.020
    1. Kline R. (1993). Harold Black and the negative-feedback amplifier. IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag. 13, 82–85 10.1109/37.229565
    1. Koole S. L. (2009). “Does emotion regulation help or hurt self-regulation.” in Psychology of Self-Regulation: Cognitive, Affective, and Motivational Processes, eds Forgas J. P., Baumeister R. F., Tice D. M. (New York: Psychology Press; ), 217–231
    1. Longo D. L., Fauci A. S., Kasper D. L., Hauser S. L., Jameson J. L., Loscalzo J. (2011). Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 18th Edn. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 142
    1. Lucas R. E., Clark A. E., Georgellis Y., Diener E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 527–539 10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527
    1. Luhmann M., Hofmann W., Eid M., Lucas R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: a meta-analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 592–615 10.1037/a0025948
    1. Marken R. S. (1988). The nature of behavior: control as fact and theory. Behav. Sci. 33, 196–206 10.1002/bs.3830330304
    1. Marken R. S., Mansell W. (2013). Perceptual control as a unifying concept in psychology. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 190–195 10.1037/a0032933
    1. Marken R. S., Powers W. T. (1989). Random-walk chemotaxis: trial and error as a control process. Behav. Neurosci. 103, 1348–1355 10.1037/0735-7044.103.6.1348
    1. Marmot M. (2006). Health in an unequal world: social circumstances, biology and disease. Clin. Med. 6, 559–572 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-6-559
    1. Mayr O. (1970). The Origins of Feedback Control. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    1. McClelland K. (2004). The collective control of perceptions: constructing order from conflict. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 60, 65–99 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.08.003
    1. McLaren N. (1998). A critical review of the biopsychosocial model. Aust. N Z J. Psychiatry 32, 86–92 10.3109/00048679809062712
    1. McLaren N. (2007). Humanizing Madness. Ann Arbor, MI: Loving Healing Press
    1. Michalak J., Heidenreich T., Hoyer J. (2004). Goal conflicts: concepts, findings and consequences for psychotherapy,” in Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Concepts, Approaches, and Assessment, eds Cox W. M., Klinger E. (Chichester, England: Wiley; ), 83–98
    1. Miller G. A., Galanter E., Pribram K. H. (1960). Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Adams Bannister Cox
    1. Mrosovsky N. (1990). Rheostasis: The Physiology of Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    1. Peters E., Joseph S., Day S., Garety P. (2004). Measuring delusional ideation: the 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophr. Bull. 30, 1005–1022 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116
    1. Pilgrim D. (2002). The biopsychosocial model in Anglo-American psychiatry: past, present and future? J. Men. Health 11, 585–594 10.1080/09638230020023930
    1. Pilgrim D., Kinderman P., Tai S. (2008). Taking stock of the biopsychosocial model in the field of ‘mental health care’. J. Soc. Psychol. Sci. 1, 1–39
    1. Powers W. T. (1971). A feedback model for behavior: application to a rat experiment. Behav. Sci. 16, 558–563 10.1002/bs.3830160606
    1. Powers W. T. (1973). Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chigago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter
    1. Powers W. T. (1979). The nature of robots. Part 2: simulation control system. Byte 4, 134–152
    1. Powers W. T. (1989). Living Control Systems. Montclair, NJ: Benchmark Publications
    1. Powers W. T. (1992). “The Wiener feedback model – a strategic error,” in Living Control Systems II 1989–1991: Selected Papers of William T. Powers. (Montclair, NJ: Benchmark Publications; ), 11–30
    1. Powers W. T. (2005). Behavior: The Control of Perception. 2nd Edn. New Canaan, CT: Benchmark Publications
    1. Powers W. T., Clark R. K., McFarland R. L. (1960). A general feedback theory of human behavior: part II. Percept. Mot. Skills 11, 309–323
    1. Priebe S., Burns T., Craig T. K. J. (2013). The future of academic psychiatry may be social. Br. J. Psychiatry 202, 319–320 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116905
    1. Read J. (2005). The bio-bio-bio model of madness. Psychologist 18, 596–597
    1. Romme M., Escher S. (2000). Making Sense of Voices: The Mental Health Professional’s Guide to Working with Voice-Hearers. London: Mind Publications
    1. Rubinstein E. A., Coelho G. V. (1970). Mental health and behavioral sciences: one federal agency’s role in the behavioral sciences. Am. Psychol. 25, 517–523 10.1037/h0029452
    1. Stiles W. B. (2009). Responsiveness as an obstacle for psychotherapy outcome research: it’s worse than you think. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 16, 86–91 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01148.x
    1. Syme S. L. (1998). The control factor: a neglected social determinant of health. Milbank Q. 76, 493–505
    1. The Lancet. (2013). Editorial: a revolution in psychiatry. Lancet 381, 1878 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61143-5
    1. Thrift A. P., Whiteman D. C. (2013). Can we really predict risk of cancer? Cancer Epidemiol. 37, 349–352 10.1016/j.canep.2013.04.002
    1. Tien A. Y. (1991). Distributions of hallucinations in the population. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 26, 287–292
    1. Tsey K. (2008). The control factor: a neglected social determinant of health. Lancet 372, 1629 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61678-5
    1. Tsokolov S. (2010). A theory of circular organization and negative feedback: defining life in a cybernetic context. Astrobiology 10, 1031–1042 10.1089/ast.2010.0532
    1. Whitaker R. (2010). Anatomy of an Epidemic: Magic Bullets, Psychiatric Drugs and the Astonishing Rise of Mental Illness in America. New York: Broadway Paperbacks
    1. Wolpert D. M., Kawato M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 11, 1317–1329 10.1016/s0893-6080(98)00066-5
    1. Wong D. (1981). Subsensitivity of serotonin receptors after long-term treatment of rats with fluoxetine. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 32, 41–51
    1. Zhang T.-Y., Meaney M. J. (2010). Epigenetics and the environmental regulation of the genome and its function. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 439–466 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707
    1. Zucker R. A., Gomberg E. S. (1986). Etiology of alcoholism reconsidered: the case for a biopsychosocial process. Am. Psychol. 41, 783–793

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit