Focal electrically administered seizure therapy: a novel form of ECT illustrates the roles of current directionality, polarity, and electrode configuration in seizure induction

Timothy Spellman, Angel V Peterchev, Sarah H Lisanby, Timothy Spellman, Angel V Peterchev, Sarah H Lisanby

Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a mainstay in the treatment of severe, medication-resistant depression. The antidepressant efficacy and cognitive side effects of ECT are influenced by the position of the electrodes on the head and by the degree to which the electrical stimulus exceeds the threshold for seizure induction. However, surprisingly little is known about the effects of other key electrical parameters such as current directionality, polarity, and electrode configuration. Understanding these relationships may inform the optimization of therapeutic interventions to improve their risk/benefit ratio. To elucidate these relationships, we evaluated a novel form of ECT (focal electrically administered seizure therapy, FEAST) that combines unidirectional stimulation, control of polarity, and an asymmetrical electrode configuration, and contrasted it with conventional ECT in a nonhuman primate model. Rhesus monkeys had their seizure thresholds determined on separate days with ECT conditions that crossed the factors of current directionality (unidirectional or bidirectional), electrode configuration (standard bilateral or FEAST (small anterior and large posterior electrode)), and polarity (assignment of anode and cathode in unidirectional stimulation). Ictal expression and post-ictal suppression were quantified through scalp EEG. Findings were replicated and extended in a second experiment with the same subjects. Seizures were induced in each of the 75 trials, including 42 FEAST procedures. Seizure thresholds were lower with unidirectional than with bidirectional stimulation (p<0.0001), and lower in FEAST than in bilateral ECS (p=0.0294). Ictal power was greatest in posterior-anode unidirectional FEAST, and post-ictal suppression was strongest in anterior-anode FEAST (p=0.0008 and p=0.0024, respectively). EEG power was higher in the stimulated hemisphere in posterior-anode FEAST (p=0.0246), consistent with the anode being the site of strongest activation. These findings suggest that current directionality, polarity, and electrode configuration influence the efficiency of seizure induction with ECT. Unidirectional stimulation and novel electrode configurations such as FEAST are two approaches to lowering seizure threshold. Furthermore, the impact of FEAST on ictal and post-ictal expression appeared to be polarity dependent. Future studies may examine whether these differences in seizure threshold and expression have clinical significance for patients receiving ECT.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design. This figure illustrates the conditions tested. Current directionality (shown in the columns) was either unidirectional or bidirectional. Electrode configuration (depicted in the rows) was either standard bilateral (BL) or Focal Electrically Applied Seizure Therapy (FEAST) with asymmetrically shaped electrodes. In Bidirectional conditions (far right column) each electrode serves as both anode and cathode for alternating pulses. In Unidirectional conditions (middle and left columns), one electrode serves as the anode (red) and one serves as the cathode (green). The small anterior anode unidirectional FEAST condition (bottom left, *) was added in Study 2. The other conditions were preformed in both Study 1 and Study 2. Each condition was replicated 4 times in each of 2 subjects, for a total of 8 replications per condition per study (total of 16 replications per condition across studies).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Seizure threshold as a function of electrode configuration and current directionality. Unidirectional had lower thresholds than bidirectional stimulation (*p

Figure 3

Ictal EEG power (log10(µV 2…

Figure 3

Ictal EEG power (log10(µV 2 )) by condition and frequency band. A: Combined…

Figure 3
Ictal EEG power (log10(µV2)) by condition and frequency band. A: Combined data from Studies 1 and 2. FEAST had higher ictal power than BL, in the slower frequency bands (*p’s

Figure 4

Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher…

Figure 4

Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher ictal power on the left hemisphere with posterior…

Figure 4
Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher ictal power on the left hemisphere with posterior anode unidirectional FEAST.
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Abrams A, Taylor MA. Anterior bifrontal ECT: a clinical trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1973;122:587–590. - PubMed
    1. Amassian VE, Crocco RQ, Maccabee PJ. Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1989a;74:401–416. - PubMed
    1. Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Crocco RQ. Focal stimulation of human peripheral nerve with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Experimental Neurology. 1989b;103:282–289. - PubMed
    1. Amassian VE, Quirk GJ, Stewart M. A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1990;77:390–401. - PubMed
    1. Antal A, Kinces TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Demmer I, Sommer M, Paulus W. Pulse configuration-dependent effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual perception. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2229–2233. - PubMed
Show all 55 references
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ictal EEG power (log10(µV2)) by condition and frequency band. A: Combined data from Studies 1 and 2. FEAST had higher ictal power than BL, in the slower frequency bands (*p’s

Figure 4

Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher…

Figure 4

Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher ictal power on the left hemisphere with posterior…

Figure 4
Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher ictal power on the left hemisphere with posterior anode unidirectional FEAST.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Representative EEG tracing illustrating higher ictal power on the left hemisphere with posterior anode unidirectional FEAST.

References

    1. Abrams A, Taylor MA. Anterior bifrontal ECT: a clinical trial. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1973;122:587–590.
    1. Amassian VE, Crocco RQ, Maccabee PJ. Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1989a;74:401–416.
    1. Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Crocco RQ. Focal stimulation of human peripheral nerve with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation. Experimental Neurology. 1989b;103:282–289.
    1. Amassian VE, Quirk GJ, Stewart M. A comparison of corticospinal activation by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation of monkey motor cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1990;77:390–401.
    1. Antal A, Kinces TZ, Nitsche MA, Bartfai O, Demmer I, Sommer M, Paulus W. Pulse configuration-dependent effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual perception. Neuroreport. 2002;13:2229–2233.
    1. APA. The practice of electroconvulsive therapy: recommendations for treatment, and privileging: a task force report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association; 2001.
    1. Arai N, Okabe S. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2005;116:605–613.
    1. Asanuma H, Arnold A, Zarzecki P. Further study on the excitation of pyramidal tract cells by intracortical microstimulation. Experimental Brain Research. 1976;26:443–461.
    1. Azuma H, Fujita A, Sato K, Arahata K, Otsuki K, Hori M, Mochida Y, Uchida M, Yamada T, Akechi T, Furukawa TA. Postictal suppression correlates with therapeutic efficacy for depression in bilateral sine and pulse wave electroconvulsive therapy. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2007;61:168–173.
    1. Berman RM, Sackeim HA, Truesdale MD, Luber B, Schroeder C, Lisanby SH. Focal electrically administered seizure therapy (FEAST): Nonhuman primate studies of a novel form of focal brain stimulation; Society for Biological Psychiatry 2005 Annual Meeting - Freshest Data; 2005.
    1. Cracco RQ, Amassian VE, Maccabee PJ, Cracco JB. Comparison of human transcallosal responses evoked by magnetic coil and electrical stimulation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1989;74:417–424.
    1. Cronholm B, Ottoson JO. Ultrabrief stimulus technique in electroconvulsive therapy: II. Comparative studies of therapeutic effects and memory disturbance in treatment of endogenous depression with the Either ES electroshock apparatus and Siemens Konvulsator IIIin EST by unilateral stimulation of the non-dominant hemisphere. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 1963a;137:268–276.
    1. Cronholm B, Ottoson JO. Ultrabrief stimulus technique in electroconvulsive therapy: Influence on retrograde amnesia of treatments with either the ES electroshock apparatus, Seimens Konvulsator III and of lidocaine-modified treatment. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 1963b;137:117–123.
    1. Davidson R, Kalin NH, Shelton SE. Lateralized effects of diazepam on frontal brain electrical asymmetries in rhesus monkeys. Biological Psychiatry. 1992;32:438–451.
    1. Diggle PJHP, Liang KY, Keger SL. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002.
    1. Epstein J, Wender L. Alternating Current vs unidirectional current for electroconvulsive therapy-comparative studies. Confin Neurol. 1956;16:137–146.
    1. Falk D, Hildebolt C, Cheverud J, Vannier M, Helmkamp RC, Konigsberg L. Cortical asymmetries in frontal lobes of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) Brain Research. 2003;512:40–45.
    1. Friedman E. Unidirectional Electrostimulated Convulsive Therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1942;99:218–223.
    1. Friedman E, Wilcox PH. Electrostimulated Convulsive Doses in intact humans by means of unidirectional currents. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders. 1942;96:56–63.
    1. Gangadhar BN, Subbakrishna DK, Janakiramaiah N, Motreja S, Narayana Dutt D, Paramehwara G. Post-seizure EEG fractal dimension of first ECT predicts antidepressant response at two weeks. Journal of Affective Disorders. 1999;52:235–238.
    1. Gavan JA, Swindler DR. Growth rates and phylogeny in primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 1996;24:181–190.
    1. Hyrman V, Palmer LH, Cernik J, Jetelina J. ECT: the search for the perfect stimulus. Biological Psychiatry. 1985;20:634–645.
    1. Impastato DJ, Berg S. Convulsive therapy with amplitude modulated unidirectional currents (Reiter) American Journal of Psychiatry. 1956;112:932–934.
    1. Lang N, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability. Experimental Brain Research. 2003;156:439–443.
    1. Libet B, Alberts WW, Wright EW, Jr, DeLattre LD, Levin G, Feinstein B. Production of threshold levels of conscious sensation by electrical stimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Journal Neurophysiology. 1964;27:546–578.
    1. Lisanby SH, Luber B, Schlaepfer TE, Sackeim HA. Safety and feasibility of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in major depression: randomized within-subject comparison with electroconvulsive therapy. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003a;28:1852–1865.
    1. Lisanby SH, Moscrip T, Morales O, Luber B, Schroeder C, Sackeim HA. Neurophysiological characterization of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in non-human primates. Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology. 2003b;56:81–99.
    1. Littell RMG, Stroup W, Wolfinger R. SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute; 1996.
    1. Marsden CD, Merton PA, Morton HB. Direct stimulation of corticospinal pathways through the intact scalp in human subjects. In: Desmedt J, editor. Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1982. pp. 387–392.
    1. Moscrip T, Terrace HS, Sackeim HA, Lisanby SH. A primate model of anterograde and retrograde amnesia produced by convulsive treatment. The Journal of ECT. 2004;20:26–36.
    1. Moscrip T, Terrace HS, Sackeim HA, Lisanby SH. Randomized controlled trial of the cognitive side-effects of magnetic seizure therapy (MST) and electroconvulsive shock (ECS) International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;9:1–11.
    1. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Schlitterlau A, Henschke U, Fricke K, Frommann K, Lang N, Henning S, Paulus W, Tergau F. GABAergic modulation of DC stimulation-induced motor cortex excitability shifts in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience. 2004;19:2720–2726.
    1. Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Nitsche MS, Fricke K, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Tergau F. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal Physiology. 2005;568(Pt 1):291–303.
    1. Nitsche MA, Doemkes S, Karakose T, Antal A, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2007;97:3109–3117.
    1. Nobler MS, Sackeim HA, Solomou M, Luber B, Devanand DP, Prudic J. EEG manifestation during ECT: Effects of electrode placement and stimulus intensity. Biological Psychiatry. 1993;34:321–330.
    1. Nowak LG, Bullier J. Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements. Experimental Brain Research. 1998;118:477–488.
    1. Perera TD, Luber B, Nobler MS, Prudic J, Anderson C, Sackeim HA. Seizure expression during electroconvulsive therapy: relationships with clinical outcome and cognitive side effects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:813–825.
    1. Peterchev A, Berman R, Luber B, Schroeder CE, Truesdale MD, Kaplan DM, Brodsky J, Lisanby SH. Relationship between electric field and ictal power induced by electroconvulsive shock (ECS) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) in nonhuman primates; American College of Neuropsychopharmacology 2007 Annual Meeting; 2007.
    1. Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Day BL, Dick JPR, Kachi T, Cowan JMA, Marsden CD. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain. 1987;110:1173–1190.
    1. Sackeim HA. Convulsant and anticonvulsant properties of electroconvulsive therapy: toward a focal form of brain stimulation. Clinical Neuroscience Research. 2004;4:39–57.
    1. Sackeim HA, Decina P, Portnoy S, Neely P, Matitz S. Studies of dosage, seizure threshold, and seizure duration in ECT. Biological Psychiatry. 1987;22:249–268.
    1. Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, Kiersky JE, Fitzsimons L, Moody BJ, McElhiney MC, Coleman EA, Settembrino JM. Effects of stimulus intensity and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1993;328:839–846.
    1. Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, Nobler MS, Lisanby SH, Peyser S, Fitzsimons L, Moody BJ, Clark J. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57:425–434.
    1. Sackeim HA, Prudic J, Nobler MS, Fitzsimons L, Lisanby SH, Payne N, Berman RM, Brakemeier EL, Perera T, Devanand D. Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy. Brain Stimulation. 2008;1:71–83.
    1. Shorter E, Healy D. Shock Therapy: A History of Electroconvulsive Treatment in Mental Illness. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 2007.
    1. Spellman T, McClintock SM, Terrace H, Luber B, Husain MM, Lisanby SH. Differential effects of high-dose magnetic seizure therapy and electroconvulsive shock on cognitive function. Biological Psychiatry. 2008;63:1163–1170.
    1. Squire LR. ECT and memory loss. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1977;134:997–1001.
    1. Squire LR, Zouzounis JA. ECT and memory: brief pulse versus sine wave. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1986;143:596–601.
    1. Squire SR, Slater PC. Bilateral and unilateral ECT: effects on verbal and nonverbal memory. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1978;135:1316–1320.
    1. Suppes T, Webb A, Carmody T, Gordon E, Guttierez-Esteinou R, Hudson JI., Jr PH Is postictal electrical silence a predictor of response to ECT? Journal of Affective Disorders. 1996;41:55–58.
    1. Taylor JL, Loo CK. Stimulus waveform influences the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2007;97:271–276.
    1. Tigges J, Gordon T, McClure H, Hall E, Peters A. Survival rate and life span of rhesus monkeys at the Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center. American Journal of Primatology. 1988;15:263–273.
    1. Tings T, Lang N, Frithjof T, Paulus W, Sommer M. Orientation-specific fast rTMS maximizes corticospinal inhibition and facilitation. Experimental Brain Research. 2005;164:323–333.
    1. Varghese FT, Singh BS. Electroconvulsive therapy in 1985-a review. Medical Journal of Australia. 1985;143:192–196.
    1. Weiner RD. ECT and seizure threshold: effects of stimulus wave form and electrode placement. Biological Psychiatry. 1980;15:225–241.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit