Effect of intrathecal morphine and epidural analgesia on postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery for gynecologic malignancy: an open-label randomised trial

Preben Kjølhede, Olga Bergdahl, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin, Lena Nilsson, Preben Kjølhede, Olga Bergdahl, Ninnie Borendal Wodlin, Lena Nilsson

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to determine whether regional analgesia with intrathecal morphine (ITM) in an enhanced recovery programme (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]) gives a shorter hospital stay with good pain relief and equal health-related quality of life (QoL) to epidural analgesia (EDA) in women after midline laparotomy for proven or assumed gynaecological malignancies.

Design: An open-label, randomised, single-centre study.

Setting: A tertiary referral Swedish university hospital.

Participants: Eighty women, 18-70 years of age, American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II, admitted consecutively to the department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Interventions: The women were allocated (1:1) to either the standard analgesic method at the clinic (EDA) or the experimental treatment (ITM). An ERAS protocol with standardised perioperative routines and standardised general anaesthesia were applied. The EDA or ITM started immediately preoperatively. The ITM group received morphine, clonidine and bupivacaine intrathecally; the EDA group had an epidural infusion of bupivacaine, adrenalin and fentanyl.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary endpoint was length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints were QoL and pain assessments.

Results: LOS was statistically significantly shorter for the ITM group compared with the EDA group (median [IQR]3.3 [1.5-56.3] vs 4.3 [2.2-43.2] days; p=0.01). No differences were observed in pain assessment or QoL. The ITM group used postoperatively the first week significantly less opioids than the EDA group (median (IQR) 20 mg (14-35 mg) vs 81 mg (67-101 mg); p<0.0001). No serious adverse events were attributed to ITM or EDA.

Conclusions: Compared with EDA, ITM is simpler to administer and manage, is associated with shorter hospital stay and reduces opioid consumption postoperatively with an equally good QoL. ITM is effective as postoperative analgesia in gynaecological cancer surgery.

Trial registration number: NCT02026687; Results.

Keywords: gynecological malignancy; laparotomy; opioid consumption; quality improvement; regional analgesia.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow chart of participants in the study. EDA, epidural analgesia; ITM, intrathecal morphine analgesia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration of the EuroQol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) weighted health state index in relation to occasion of measurement. Plots represent means and bars represent 95% CI. Result of the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) from day 0–42 assessment is presented. No significant differences were observed in the EQ-5D health index between the two groups preoperatively. EDA, epidural analgesia; ITM, intrathecal morphine analgesia.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Assessment of pain by means of a 10 graded numeric rating scale (NRS) at rest and at mobilisation. Plots represent means and bars represent 95% CI. Results of the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests from day 0 to the day 6 are shown in the table below the diagrams. Assessments done from the evening of surgery and three times daily. Days 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, respectively, represent the measurements performed in the morning, the afternoon and the evening on day 1. EDA, epidural analgesia; ITM, intrathecal morphine analgesia.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Consumption of analgesics after surgery in relation to occasion of measurement. Plots represent means and bars represent 95% CI. Results of the repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests from day 0 to the day 6 assessment for equivalent morphine given and for day 3 to day 42 for defined daily dose (DDD) non-opioids are presented in the table below the diagram. EDA, epidural analgesia; ITM, intrathecal morphine analgesia.

References

    1. Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, et al. . Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012;31:801–16. 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.012
    1. Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, et al. . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60:289–334. 10.1111/aas.12651
    1. Devys JM, Mora A, Plaud B, et al. . Intrathecal + PCA morphine improves analgesia during the first 24 hr after major abdominal surgery compared to PCA alone. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:355–61. 10.1007/BF03021032
    1. Andrieu G, Roth B, Ousmane L, et al. . The efficacy of intrathecal morphine with or without clonidine for postoperative analgesia after radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;108:1954–7. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a30182
    1. Sakowska M, Docherty E, Linscott D, et al. . A change in practice from epidural to intrathecal morphine analgesia for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. World J Surg 2009;33:1802–8. 10.1007/s00268-009-0131-2
    1. Bujedo BM, Santos SG, Azpiazu AU. A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in the management of postoperative pain. J Opioid Manag 2012;8:177–92. 10.5055/jom.2012.0114
    1. Borendal Wodlin N, Nilsson L, Kjølhede P. GASPI study group. The impact of mode of anaesthesia on postoperative recovery from fast-track abdominal hysterectomy: a randomised clinical trial. BJOG 2011;118:299–308. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02697.x
    1. Kroon UB, Rådström M, Hjelthe C, et al. . Fast-track hysterectomy: a randomised, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;151:203–7. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.04.001
    1. Engelman E, Marsala C. Efficacy of adding clonidine to intrathecal morphine in acute postoperative pain: meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2013;110:21–7. 10.1093/bja/aes344
    1. Sites BD, Beach M, Biggs R, et al. . Intrathecal clonidine added to a bupivacaine-morphine spinal anesthetic improves postoperative analgesia for total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1083–8. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000055651.24073.59
    1. Kara I, Apiliogullari S, Oc B, et al. . The effects of intrathecal morphine on patient-controlled analgesia, morphine consumption, postoperative pain and satisfaction scores in patients undergoing gynaecological oncological surgery. J Int Med Res 2012;40:666–72. 10.1177/147323001204000229
    1. De Pietri L, Siniscalchi A, Reggiani A, et al. . The use of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief after liver resection: a comparison with epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2006;102:1157–63. 10.1213/01.ane.0000198567.85040.ce
    1. Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K. Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surgery 2009;2009:1–8. 10.1155/2009/271986
    1. Vercauteren M, Vereecken K, La Malfa M, et al. . Cost-effectiveness of analgesia after Caesarean section. A comparison of intrathecal morphine and epidural PCA. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:85–9. 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.460115.x
    1. Good Clinical Practice. International Conference on Harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. (Accessed 28 Apr 2018).
    1. Allocation. Simple Interactive Statistical Analysis. (Accessed 28 Apr 2018).
    1. Svensk Förening för Anestesi och Intensivvård. Postoperative analgesia (In Swedish). (Accessed 28 Apr 2018).
    1. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index. 2017. Available online at (Accessed 28 Apr 2018).
    1. Loper KA, Ready LB, Downey M, et al. . Epidural and intravenous fentanyl infusions are clinically equivalent after knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1990;70:72–5. 10.1213/00000539-199001000-00012
    1. Caraceni A, Hanks G, Kaasa S, et al. . Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:e58–68. 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:206–13.
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
    1. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey--I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 1995;41:1349–58. 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-Q
    1. Hein A, Gillis-Haegerstrand C, Jakobsson JG. Neuraxial opioids as analgesia in labour, caesarean section and hysterectomy: a questionnaire survey in Sweden. F1000Res 2017;6:133 10.12688/f1000research.10705.2
    1. Gehling M, Tryba M. Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia 2009;64:643–51. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05817.x
    1. Hein A, Rösblad P, Gillis-Haegerstrand C, et al. . Low dose intrathecal morphine effects on post-hysterectomy pain: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012;56:102–9. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02574.x
    1. Wijk L, Franzén K, Ljungqvist O, et al. . Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in abdominal hysterectomies for malignant versus benign disease. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016;81:461–7. 10.1159/000443396
    1. Carter J. Fast-track surgery in gynaecology and gynaecologic oncology: a review of a rolling clinical audit. ISRN Surg 2012;2012:1–19. 10.5402/2012/368014
    1. Dickson EL, Stockwell E, Geller MA, et al. . Enhanced recovery program and length of stay after laparotomy on a gynecologic oncology service: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2017;129:355–62. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001838
    1. Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A, et al. . Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations--Part II. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140:323–32. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.019
    1. Khalil A, Ganesh S, Hughes C, et al. . Evaluation of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in living liver donors. Clin Transplant 2018;32:e13342 10.1111/ctr.13342
    1. Koning MV, Teunissen AJW, van der Harst E, et al. . Intrathecal morphine for laparoscopic segmental colonic resection as part of an enhanced recovery protocol: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2018;43:166–73. 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000703
    1. Helander EM, Webb MP, Bias M, et al. . Use of regional anesthesia techniques: analysis of institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017;27:898–902. 10.1089/lap.2017.0339
    1. Virlos I, Clements D, Beynon J, et al. . Short-term outcomes with intrathecal versus epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97:1401–6. 10.1002/bjs.7127
    1. Pitre L, Garbee D, Tipton J, et al. . Effects of preoperative intrathecal morphine on postoperative intravenous morphine dosage: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2018;16:867–70. 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003209
    1. Belavy D, Janda M, Baker J, et al. . Epidural analgesia is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications in patients requiring an abdominal hysterectomy for early stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:423–9. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.08.027
    1. Massicotte L, Chalaoui KD, Beaulieu D, et al. . Comparison of spinal anesthesia with general anesthesia on morphine requirement after abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009;53:641–7. 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.01930.x
    1. Devlin NJ, Shah KK, Feng Y, et al. . Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ 2018;27:7–22. 10.1002/hec.3564

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit