Three-Year Glycaemic Control and Management in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Initiating Second-Line Treatment in Japan: A Prospective Observational Study, J-DISCOVER

Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Tomoya Mita, Naoto Katakami, Fumitaka Wada, Naru Morita, Yoko Kidani, Toshitaka Yajima, Iichiro Shimomura, Hirotaka Watada, J-DISCOVER study group, Mitsuyoshi Takahara, Tomoya Mita, Naoto Katakami, Fumitaka Wada, Naru Morita, Yoko Kidani, Toshitaka Yajima, Iichiro Shimomura, Hirotaka Watada, J-DISCOVER study group

Abstract

Introduction: J-DISCOVER is a prospective, observational cohort study that aimed to understand characteristics, glycaemic control, comorbidities and real-world management of patients with early-stage type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Japan, by enrolling patients initiating second-line treatment from both diabetes specialist and non-specialist care settings.

Methods: As part of the global DISCOVER programme, J-DISCOVER enrolled 1798 patients with T2DM aged at least 20 years old from 142 sites across Japan, from September 2014 to December 2015, and followed these patients for 3 years. Glycaemic control, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, lipid profiles, treatment patterns, and prevalence of CKD and retinopathy were examined from baseline to 6, 12, 24 and 36 months, stratified by class of second-line treatment.

Results: At baseline, the median time after T2DM diagnosis was 3.1 years and mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 7.7%. The mean individualized HbA1c target was 6.7 ± 0.5%, and 55.3% of patients were set the target of < 7.0%. HbA1c reductions were noted from 6 months and mean HbA1c was 7.1% at 36 months. The proportion of patients with HbA1c < 7.0% increased from 28.8% at baseline to 53.3% at 36 months, and the achievement rate of individualized HbA1c targets increased from 6.1% to 30.3%. Only two cases of severe hypoglycaemia occurred during the study. No major changes in BMI, blood pressure, lipid profile or prescription of antihypertensive or dyslipidaemia medications were observed. The frequencies of screening to detect retinopathy and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were 17.0-21.0% and 14.5-16.0%, respectively, during the follow-up period. The prevalence of CKD, but not retinopathy, increased over the follow-up period.

Conclusions: This study provided an overview of the 3-year management of early-stage T2DM in patients initiating second-line treatment. Contemporary management improved glycaemic control with an acceptable risk-benefit balance, although hurdles remain to sufficient implementation of guideline-recommended treatments in current clinical practice.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02226822.

Keywords: Antidiabetic drugs; Diabetes complications; Glycaemic control; Second-line treatment; Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of individualized HbA1c targets at baseline. n denotes the number of patients who have relevant data available. α-GI alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, BG biguanide, DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, GLP-1RA glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, SGLT2i sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, SU sulfonylurea, TZD thiazolidinedione
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean HbA1c by second-line treatment. Whiskers represent standard deviations. n denotes the number of patients who have relevant data available. α-GI alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, BG biguanide, DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, GLP-1RA glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, SGLT2i sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, SU sulfonylurea, TZD thiazolidinedione
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Proportions of patients who achieved A HbA1c < 7.0% and B individualized targets. n denotes the number of patients who have relevant data available. α-GI alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, BG biguanide, DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, GLP-1RA glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, HbA1c glycated haemoglobin, SGLT2i sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, SU sulfonylurea, TZD thiazolidinedione
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Proportions of patients with available screening data for CKD and retinopathy. n denotes the total number of patients, except for consultation by ophthalmologist (for which n denotes the number of patients for whom microvascular complications were investigated)

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas (9th Edition 2019). 2019. . Accessed 11 May 2020.
    1. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare . The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan. Tokyo: Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare; 2014.
    1. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2545–2559. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743.
    1. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, et al. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(2):129–139. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808431.
    1. Advance Collaborative Group. Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2560–2572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987.
    1. UKPDS Study Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9131):837–853. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6.
    1. Holman RR, Paul SK, Bethel MA, Matthews DR, Neil HA. 10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(15):1577–1589. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806470.
    1. Araki E, Goto A, Kondo T, et al. Japanese clinical practice guideline for diabetes 2019. Diabetol Int. 2020;11(4):1020–1076.
    1. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia. 2018;61(12):2461–2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
    1. Ji L, Bonnet F, Charbonnel B, et al. Towards an improved global understanding of treatment and outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes: rationale and methods of the DISCOVER observational study program. J Diabetes Compl. 2017;31(7):1188–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.03.011.
    1. Katakami N, Mita T, Takahara M, et al. Rationale and design for the J-DISCOVER study: discovering the treatment reality of type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting in Japan a protocol. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(1):165–175. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0351-7.
    1. Fujihara K, Hanyu O, Heianza Y, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics in patients with type 2 diabetes among whom different antihyperglycemic agents were prescribed as monotherapy or combination therapy by diabetes specialists. J Diabetes Investig. 2016;7(2):260–269. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12387.
    1. Hayashino Y, Izumi K, Okamura S, Nishimura R, Origasa H, Tajima N. Duration of diabetes and types of diabetes therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: The Japan Diabetes Complication and its Prevention prospective study 3 (JDCP study 3) J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8(2):243–249. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12550.
    1. Katakami N, Mita T, Takahara M, et al. Baseline characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line treatment in Japan: findings from the J-DISCOVER study. Diabetes Ther. 2020;11(7):1563–1578. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00846-6.
    1. Iwasaki T, Hirose A, Azuma T, et al. Association between eating behavior and poor glycemic control in Japanese adults. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3418. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39001-y.
    1. Tajima N, Nishimura R, Izumi K, et al. A large-scale, observational study to investigate the current status of diabetes complications and their prevention in Japan: research outline and baseline data for type 2 diabetes—JDCP study 1. Diabetol Int. 2015;6(4):243–251. doi: 10.1007/s13340-015-0223-1.
    1. Diabetes Database Construction Committee. Tajima N, Nishimura N, et al. Large-scale observational study on the actual condition of diabetic complications and their suppression-research plan and baseline data of type 2 diabetes: JDCP study 1 [Japanese] Diabetes. 2015;58(5):346–357.
    1. Ueki K, Sasako T, Okazaki Y, et al. Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(12):951–964. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30327-3.
    1. Khunti K, Chen H, Cid-Ruzafa J, et al. Glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating second-line therapy: results from the global DISCOVER study programme. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(1):66–78. doi: 10.1111/dom.13866.
    1. Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, et al. Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2545–2559. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802743.
    1. The ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Patel A, MacMahon S, et al. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(24):2560–2572. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802987.
    1. Schmieder RE, Tschöpe D, Koch C, Ouarrak T, Gitt AK. Individualised treatment targets in patients with type-2 diabetes and hypertension. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0661-8.
    1. Rathmann W, Charbonnel B, Gomes MB, et al. Socioeconomic factors associated with hypoglycaemia in patients starting second-line glucose-lowering therapy: the DISCOVER study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020;165:108250. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108250.
    1. Sugiyama T, Imai K, Ihana-Sugiyama N, et al. Variation in process quality measures of diabetes care by region and institution in Japan during 2015–2016: an observational study of nationwide claims data. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;155:750. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.029.
    1. Tanaka H, Sugiyama T, Ihana-Sugiyama N, Ueki K, Kobayashi Y, Ohsugi M. Changes in the quality of diabetes care in Japan between 2007 and 2015: a repeated cross-sectional study using claims data. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;149:188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.02.001.
    1. Birkeland KI, Bodegard J, Eriksson JW, et al. Heart failure and chronic kidney disease manifestation and mortality risk associations in type 2 diabetes: a large multinational cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(9):1607–1618. doi: 10.1111/dom.14074.
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(6):580–591. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245.
    1. Gaede P, Vedel P, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Intensified multifactorial intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria: the Steno type 2 randomised study. Lancet. 1999;353(9153):617–622. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07368-1.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit