The effect of simulation-based training on initial performance of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade in a clinical setting - a pilot study

Owen O'Sullivan, Gabriella Iohom, Brian D O'Donnell, George D Shorten, Owen O'Sullivan, Gabriella Iohom, Brian D O'Donnell, George D Shorten

Abstract

Background: In preparing novice anesthesiologists to perform their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade, we hypothesized that virtual reality simulation-based training offers an additional learning benefit over standard training. We carried out pilot testing of this hypothesis using a prospective, single blind, randomized controlled trial.

Methods: We planned to recruit 20 anesthesiologists who had no experience of performing ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Initial standardized training, reflecting current best available practice was provided to all participating trainees. Trainees were randomized into one of two groups; (i) to undertake additional simulation-based training or (ii) no further training. On completion of their assigned training, trainees attempted their first ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Two experts, blinded to the trainees' group allocation, assessed the performance of trainees using validated tools.

Results: This study was discontinued following a planned interim analysis, having recruited 10 trainees. This occurred because it became clear that the functionality of the available simulator was insufficient to meet our training requirements. There were no statistically significant difference in clinical performance, as assessed using the sum of a Global Rating Score and a checklist score, between simulation-based training [mean 32.9 (standard deviation 11.1)] and control trainees [31.5 (4.2)] (p = 0.885).

Conclusions: We have described a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of a simulator, during its development, by means of a randomized controlled trial. We believe that the learning acquired will be useful if performing future trials on learning efficacy associated with simulation based training in procedural skills.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01965314. Registered October 17th 2013.

Keywords: Procedural training; Simulation; Technology-enhanced learning; Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia; Validation; Virtual reality.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Configuration of simulator similar to that during trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flow diagram.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sample instruction material.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sample end of session debrief.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Automated login process.

References

    1. O’Sullivan O, Shorten GD, Aboulafia A. Determinants of learning ultrasound‒guided axillary brachial plexus blockade. Clin Teach. 2011;8:236–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00471.x.
    1. Murin S, Stollenwerk NS. Simulation in procedural training: at the tipping point. Chest. 2010;137:1009–1011. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0199.
    1. Frank JR, Snell LS, Cate OT, Holmboe ES, Carraccio C, Swing SR, Harris P, Glasgow NJ, Campbell C, Dath D, Harden RM, Iobst W, Long DM, Mungroo R, Richardson DL, Sherbino J, Silver I, Taber S, Talbot M, Harris KA. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach. 2010;32:638–645. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.501190.
    1. Steadman RH, Huang YM. Simulation for quality assurance in training, credentialing and maintenance of certification. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2012;26:3–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2012.01.002.
    1. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hamstra SJ. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306:978–988.
    1. Grottke O, Ntouba A, Ullrich S, Liao W, Fried E, Prescher A, Deserno TM, Kuhlen T, Rossaint R. Virtual reality-based simulator for training in regional anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:594–600. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep224.
    1. Kulcsár Z, O'Mahony E, Lövquist E, Aboulafia A, Sabova D, Ghori K, Iohom G, Shorten G. Preliminary evaluation of a virtual reality-based simulator for learning spinal anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.06.015.
    1. Sultan SF, Shorten G, Iohom G. Simulators for training in ultrasound guided procedures. Med Ultrason. 2013;15:125–131. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.152.sfs1gs2.
    1. Barrington MJ, Wong DM, Slater B, Ivanusic JJ, Ovens M. Ultrasound- guided regional anesthesia: how much practice do novices require before achieving competency in ultrasound needle visualization using a cadaver model. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:334–339. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3182475fba.
    1. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O'Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–463. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.
    1. Park J, MacRae H, Musselman LJ, Rossos P, Hamstra SJ, Wolman S, Reznick RK. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg. 2007;194:205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.032.
    1. Shorten GD, O'Sullivan O. Simulation for training in ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blockade. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;48:21–33. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e3181f2bb79.
    1. Ekstrom RB, French JW, Harman HH, Dermen D. Manual for kit of factor- referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational testing service; 1976.
    1. Sites BD, Chan VW, Neal JM, Weller R, Grau T, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Ivani G, American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, European Society Of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy Joint Committee The American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine and the European society of regional anaesthesia and pain therapy joint committee recommendations for education and training in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:40–46. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181926779.
    1. O'Sullivan O, Aboulafia A, Iohom G, O'Donnell BD, Shorten GD. Proactive error analysis of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block performance. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:502–507. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318228d1c0.
    1. Sultan S, Iohom G, Saunders J, Shorten G. A clinical assessment tool for ultrasound‒guided axillary brachial plexus block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56:616–623. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02673.x.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1511–e1530. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632.
    1. Sinitsky DM, Fernando B, Berlingieri P. Establishing a curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skills in the virtual reality environment. Am J Surg. 2012;204:367–376. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.11.010.
    1. Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hatala R. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35:e867–e898. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886.
    1. Zendejas B, Wang AT, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. Cost: the missing outcome in simulation-based medical education research: a systematic review. Surgery. 2013;153:160–176. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.06.025.
    1. Thompson JR, Leonard AC, Doarn CR, Roesch MJ, Broderick TJ. Limited value of haptics in virtual reality laparoscopic cholecystectomy training. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1107–1114. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1325-2.
    1. Cash CJ, Sardesai AM, Berman LH, Herrick MJ, Treece GM, Prager RW, Gee AH. Spatial mapping of the brachial plexus using three-dimensional ultrasound. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:1086–1094. doi: 10.1259/bjr/36348588.
    1. Rosenberg AD, Popovic J, Albert DB, Altman RA, Marshall MH, Sommer RM, Cuff G. Three partial-task simulators for teaching ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:106–110. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31823699ab.
    1. O’Sullivan O, O’Donnell BD, Iohom G, Shorten GD. Simulation of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: are we there yet? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:461. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318255493e.
    1. Gilpin K, Pybus D, Vuylsteke A. Medical simulation in ‘my world’. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:702–705. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07220.x.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit