Randomized Trial of Text Messaging to Reduce Early Discontinuation of Adjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy in Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: SWOG S1105

Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger, Grace Clarke Hillyer, Anna Moseley, Kathryn B Arnold, Shaker R Dakhil, Benjamin T Esparaz, Ming C Kuan, Mark L Graham 2nd, Douglas M Lackowski, William J Edenfield, Zoneddy R Dayao, N Lynn Henry, Julie R Gralow, Scott D Ramsey, Alfred I Neugut, Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger, Grace Clarke Hillyer, Anna Moseley, Kathryn B Arnold, Shaker R Dakhil, Benjamin T Esparaz, Ming C Kuan, Mark L Graham 2nd, Douglas M Lackowski, William J Edenfield, Zoneddy R Dayao, N Lynn Henry, Julie R Gralow, Scott D Ramsey, Alfred I Neugut

Abstract

Purpose: Nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer is common and increases the risk of recurrence. Text messaging increases adherence to medications for chronic conditions.

Methods: We conducted a randomized clinical trial of text messaging (TM) versus no text messaging (No-TM) at 40 sites in the United States. Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer taking an AI for > 30 days with a planned duration of ≥ 36 months. Test messages were sent twice a week over 36 months. Content themes focused on overcoming barriers to medication adherence and included cues to action, statements related to medication efficacy, and reinforcements of the recommendation to take AIs. Both groups were assessed every 3 months. The primary outcome was time to adherence failure (AF), where AF was defined as urine AI metabolite assay results satisfying one of the following: < 10 ng/mL, undetectable, or no submitted specimen. A stratified log-rank test was conducted. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results: In total, 724 patients were registered between May 2012 and September 2013, among whom,702 patients (348 in the text-messaging arm and 354 in the no-text-messaging arm) were eligible at baseline. Observed adherence at 36 months was 55.5% for TM and 55.4% for No-TM. The primary analysis showed no difference in time to AF by arm (3-year AF: 81.9% TM v 85.6% No-TM; HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05]; P = .18). Multiple time to AF sensitivity analyses showed similar nonsignificant results. Three-year self-reported time to AF (10.4% v 10.3%; HR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.98]; P = .57) and site-reported time to AF (21.9% v 18.9%; HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.86 to 2.01]; P = .21) also did not differ by arm.

Conclusion: To our knowledge, this was the first large, long-term, randomized trial of an intervention directed at improving AI adherence. We found high rates of AI AF. Twice-weekly text reminders did not improve adherence to AIs. Improving long-term adherence will likely require personalized and sustained behavioral interventions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01515800.

Conflict of interest statement

The content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Consort diagram of patient flow. AI, aromatase inhibitor; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Kaplan-Meier curves of time to adherence failure by treatment arm. Adherence failure is defined as it was for the primary analysis. +, censoring; HR, hazard ratio.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Annual cross-sectional assessment of adherence as determined by submitted urine for biomarkers. Annual observed adherence by arm, including all eligible patients, regardless of prior adherence status and not accounting for censoring. The difference in adherence at each time point between the text messaging (TM) and the no text messaging (No-TM) groups was not statistically significant.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit