Multicomponent intervention to reduce daily sedentary time: a randomised controlled trial

Lucas J Carr, Kristina Karvinen, Mallory Peavler, Rebecca Smith, Kayla Cangelosi, Lucas J Carr, Kristina Karvinen, Mallory Peavler, Rebecca Smith, Kayla Cangelosi

Abstract

Objectives: To test the efficacy of a multicomponent technology intervention for reducing daily sedentary time and improving cardiometabolic disease risk among sedentary, overweight university employees.

Design: Blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: A large south-eastern university in the USA.

Participants: 49 middle-aged, primarily female, sedentary and overweight adults working in sedentary jobs enrolled in the study. A total of 40 participants completed the study.

Interventions: Participants were randomised to either: (1) an intervention group (N=23; 47.6+9.9 years; 94.1% female; 33.2+4.5 kg/m(2)); (2) or wait-list control group (N=17; 42.6+8.9 years; 86.9% female; 31.7+4.9 kg/m(2)). The intervention group received a theory-based, internet-delivered programme, a portable pedal machine at work and a pedometer for 12 weeks. The wait-list control group maintained their behaviours for 12 weeks.

Outcome measures: Primary (sedentary and physical activity behaviour measured objectively through StepWatch) and secondary (heart rate, blood pressure, height, weight, waist circumference, per cent body fat, cardiorespiratory fitness, fasting lipids) outcomes were measured at baseline and postintervention (12 weeks). Exploratory outcomes including intervention compliance and process evaluation measures were also assessed postintervention.

Results: Compared to controls, the intervention group reduced daily sedentary time (mean change (95%CI): -58.7 min/day (-118.4 to 0.99; p<0.01)) after adjusting for baseline values and monitor wear time. Intervention participants logged on to the website 71.3% of all intervention days, used the pedal machine 37.7% of all working intervention days and pedalled an average of 31.1 min/day.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that the intervention was engaging and resulted in reductions in daily sedentary time among full-time sedentary employees. These findings hold public health significance due to the growing number of sedentary jobs and the potential of these technologies in large-scale worksite programmes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01371084.

Keywords: sedentary; technology; worksite.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sequence of events and recruitment/enrolment schematic. Study was coordinated at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, from June 2011 to June 2012.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Images of intervention features: (A) portable pedal machine, (B) pedal machine activity tracking software screenshot, (C) pedal machine monitor feedback, (D) pedometer and (E) screenshot of the website homepage.

References

    1. Warren TY, Barry V, Hooker SP, et al. Sedentary behaviors increase risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in men. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:879–85
    1. Thorp AA, Healy GN, Owen N, et al. Deleterious associations of sitting time and television viewing time with cardiometabolic risk biomarkers: Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study 2004–2005. Diabetes Care 2010;33:327–34
    1. Roberts CK, Vaziri ND, Sindhu RK, et al. A high-fat, refined-carbohydrate diet affects renal NO synthase protein expression and salt sensitivity. J Appl Physiol 2003;94:941–6
    1. Beunza JJ, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Ebrahim S, et al. Sedentary behaviors and the risk of incident hypertension: the SUN Cohort. Am J Hypertens 2007;20:1156–62
    1. Ford ES, Kohl HW, III, Mokdad AH, et al. Sedentary behavior, physical activity, and the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adults. Obesity Res 2005;13:608–14
    1. Must A, Tybor DJ. Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a review of longitudinal studies of weight and adiposity in youth. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005;29(Suppl 2):S84–96
    1. Dunstan DW, Kingwell BA, Larsen R, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care 2012;35:976–83
    1. Duvivier BM, Schaper NC, Bremers MA, et al. Minimal intensity physical activity (standing and walking) of longer duration improves insulin action and plasma lipids more than shorter periods of moderate to vigorous exercise (cycling) in sedentary subjects when energy expenditure is comparable. PLoS ONE 2013;8:e55542.
    1. Thorp AA, Healy GN, Winkler E, et al. Prolonged sedentary time and physical activity in workplace and non-work contexts: a cross-sectional study of office, customer service and call centre employees. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012;9:128.
    1. Carr LJ, Walaska KA, Marcus BH. Feasibility of a portable pedal exercise machine for reducing sedentary time in the workplace. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:430–5
    1. McCrady SK, Levine JA. Sedentariness at work: how much do we really sit? Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009;17:2103–5
    1. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA. Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors? Annu Rev Public Health 2005;26:421–43
    1. Church TS, Thomas DM, Tudor-Locke C, et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e19657.
    1. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Cooper PS, et al. Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 2009;37:330–9
    1. Dishman RK, Oldenburg B, O'Neal H, et al. Worksite physical activity interventions. Am J Prev Med 1998;15:344–61
    1. Stokols D, Pelletier KR, Fielding JE. The ecology of work and health: research and policy directions for the promotion of employee health. Health Educ Q 1996;23:137–58
    1. Chau JY, der Ploeg HP, van Uffelen JG, et al. Are workplace interventions to reduce sitting effective? A systematic review. Prev Med 2010;51:352–6
    1. Healy GN, Eakin EG, Lamontagne AD, et al. Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention. Prev Med 2013;57:43–8
    1. Evans RE, Fawole HO, Sheriff SA, et al. Point-of-choice prompts to reduce sitting time at work: a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:293–7
    1. Alkhajah TA, Reeves MM, Eakin EG, et al. Sit-stand workstations: a pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time. Am J Prev Med 2012;43:298–303
    1. . Random Sequence Generator. 2011. Secondary Random Sequence Generator.
    1. Bandura A. ed. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. EnglewoodCliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986
    1. Mudge S, Taylor D, Chang O, et al. Test-retest reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor outputs in healthy adults. J Phys Act Health 2010;7:671–6
    1. Foster RC, Lanningham-Foster LM, Manohar C, et al. Precision and accuracy of an ankle-worn accelerometer-based pedometer in step counting and energy expenditure. Prev Med 2005;41:778–83
    1. Carr LJ, Mahar MT. Accuracy of intensity and inclinometer output of three activity monitors for identification of sedentary behavior and light-intensity activity. J Obes 2012;2012:1–9
    1. Rowe DA, Welk GJ, Heil DP, et al. Stride rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:312–18
    1. ACSM ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 7th edn Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006
    1. Issa JS, Strunz C, Giannini SD, et al. Precision and accuracy of blood lipid analyses by a portable device (Cholestech-LDX). Arq Bras Cardiol 1996;66:339–42
    1. Ebbeling CB, Ward A, Puleo EM, et al. Development of a single-stage submaximal treadmill walking test. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991;8:966–73
    1. Van Breukelen GJ. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:920–5
    1. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Staudenmayer J, et al. The Feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. J Obes 2012;2012:1–10
    1. Owen N, Sparling PB, Healy GN, et al. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:1138–41
    1. Rhodes RE, Mark RS, Temmel CP. Adult sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2012;42:e3–28
    1. Thorp AA, Owen N, Neuhaus M, et al. Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011. Am J Prev Med 2011;41:207–15
    1. Coutinho T, Goel K, Correa de Sa D, et al. Combining body mass index with measures of central obesity in the assessment of mortality in subjects with coronary disease: role of ‘normal weight central obesity’. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:553–60
    1. Carr LJ, Bartee RT, Dorozynski C, et al. Internet-delivered behavior change program increases physical activity and improves cardiometabolic disease risk factors in sedentary adults: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2008;46:431–8
    1. Healy GN, Dunstan DW, Salmon J, et al. Breaks in sedentary time: beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care 2008;31:661–6
    1. Spittaels H, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Evaluation of a website-delivered computer-tailored intervention for increasing physical activity in the general population. Prev Med 2007;44:209–17
    1. Vandelanotte C, Spathonis KM, Eakin EG, et al. Website-delivered physical activity interventions a review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 2007;33:54–64
    1. van den Berg MH, Ronday HK, Peeters AJ, et al. Engagement and satisfaction with an internet-based physical activity intervention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:545–52
    1. Lewis B, Williams D, Dunsiger S, et al. User attitudes towards physical activity websites in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2008;47:508–13
    1. Proper KI, van der Beek AJ, Hildebrandt VH, et al. Short term effect of feedback on fitness and health measurements on self reported appraisal of the stage of change. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:529–34
    1. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 2007;298:2296–304

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit