Tumor-Preferential Induction of Immune Responses and Epidermal Cell Death in Actinic Keratoses by Ingenol Mebutate

Steffen Emmert, Holger A Haenssle, John R Zibert, Margarete Schön, Andreas Hald, Maria H Hansen, Thomas Litman, Michael P Schön, Steffen Emmert, Holger A Haenssle, John R Zibert, Margarete Schön, Andreas Hald, Maria H Hansen, Thomas Litman, Michael P Schön

Abstract

The rapid and strong clinical efficacy of the first-in-class, ingenol mebutate, against actinic keratosis (AK) has resulted in its recent approval. We conducted the first comprehensive analysis of the cellular and molecular mode of action of topical ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel in both AK and uninvolved skin of 26 patients in a phase I, single-center, open-label, within-patient comparison. As early as 1 day after application, ingenol mebutate induced profound epidermal cell death, along with a strong infiltrate of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, neutrophils, and macrophages. Endothelial ICAM-1 activation became evident after 2 days. The reaction pattern was significantly more pronounced in AK compared with uninvolved skin, suggesting a tumor-preferential mode of action. Extensive molecular analyses and transcriptomic profiling of mRNAs and microRNAs demonstrated alterations in gene clusters functionally associated with epidermal development, inflammation, innate immunity, and response to wounding. Ingenol mebutate reveals a unique mode of action linking directly to anti-tumoral effects.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01387711.

Conflict of interest statement

S.E., H.A.H., M.S., and M.P.S. declare no competing financial interests. J.R.Z., T.L., A.H., and M.H.H. are employees of LEO Pharma A/S, the manufacturer of ingenol mebutate gel. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. Inflammatory skin reactions induced by…
Fig 1. Inflammatory skin reactions induced by ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel are more pronounced in actinic keratosis (AK)-lesioned areas compared with uninvolved skin.
(A) CONSORT study diagram. This was a phase I, single-center, open-label, within-patient comparison trial to explore the biological effects of ingenol mebutate gel applied once daily for 2 consecutive days in patients with actinic keratosis (AK) in a 25-cm2 area on the extremities and a 25-cm2 area of uninvolved-skin (US) on the inner upper arm. (B) Typical skin reactions during the course of the trial in AK treatment areas of three representative patients at the dorsum of the hand (upper panel) (n = 26) and uninvolved skin of the inner upper arm (lower panel) (n = 26) at day 0 (baseline), day 1 (after one treatment application), and day 2 (after two treatment applications) as well as during follow-up at days 8 and 29. (B) The composite local skin response (LSR) score is the sum of six individual LSR scores including erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting, swelling, vesiculation/pustulation, and erosion/ulceration, which range from 0 to 4, with higher numbers indicating more severe reactions. This was calculated at each study visit for each patient, with a theoretical maximum composite score of 24. Patients were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 8, and 29. No unexpected signs of local or systemic toxicity were noted. Illustrated are averages of the LSR; error bars indicate standard error of the mean.
Fig 2. Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel treatment…
Fig 2. Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel treatment causes rapid infiltration of T-cells, macrophages, and neutrophilic granulocytes.
Biopsy specimens from all patients (n = 26) were subjected to histopathological evaluation. Skin tissues from the two treatment areas and all time points were assessed, and representative images are depicted. The panels depict hematoxylin & eosin staining as well as immunohistochemical staining for CD4+ T-lymphocytes, CD8+ T-lymphocytes, CD68+ macrophages/histiocytes, and myeloperoxidase (MPO+) neutrophils as indicated. The scale bar represents 100 μm.
Fig 3. Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel activates…
Fig 3. Ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel activates cutaneous blood vessels and induces epidermal cell death.
Biopsy specimens from both treatment areas of all patients (n = 26) and all time points were assessed immunohistochemically for expression of CD20+ B-lymphocytes, ICAM-1 (CD54), and CD1a+ cells. Cleaved caspase 3 and TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) reactivity indicating apoptotic responses were detected in five of these patients (arrows indicate examples of TUNEL positive epidermal cells). The figure depicts representative slides from all stainings as indicated. The scale bar represents 100 μm.
Fig 4. Cells of the adaptive and…
Fig 4. Cells of the adaptive and innate immune system increase strongly upon topical treatment with ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel.
For detailed quantification, two complementary quantitative analyses were conducted to ensure high-quality measurements. Automated histomorphometric analyses (A) and manual counting of positive cells (B) were performed on all samples (actinic keratosis [AK] lesions at day 0, day 1, and day 2, and uninvolved skin (US) at day 0 and day 2 from all patients (n = 26). Depicted data represent averages +/- standard error of the mean. There was a statistically significant overall concordance with the two technologies, e.g. for CD4+ epidermis (r = 0.4) and dermis (r = 0.4) and for CD8+ epidermis (r = 0.5) and dermis (r = 0.7). The data for the computer-based histomorphometrical analysis were logarithmically transformed. Statistical significance was determined by analysis of variance for: CD4+ T-lymphocytes, epidermis/dermis AK0 versus AK2 (P = 0.0007/P = 0.0006), US0 versus US2 (P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001) and for US2 versus AK2 (not significant [NS]/P < 0.0001), CD8+ T-lymphocytes, epidermis/dermis AK0 versus AK2 (P = 0.0024/P = 0.0019), US0 versus US2 (P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001), and for US2 versus AK2 (NS/P = 0.0065), CD68+ macrophages/histiocytes, dermis (epidermis was NS) AK0 versus AK2 (P < 0.0001), US0 versus US2 (P < 0.0001), and for US2 versus AK2 (P = 0.0042), and MPO+ neutrophils, epidermis/dermis AK0 versus AK2 (P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001), US0 versus US2 (P < 0.0001/P < 0.0001), and for US2 versus AK2 (NS/NS). A full statistical overview is available in S1 Table.
Fig 5. Topical ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel…
Fig 5. Topical ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel activates cutaneous blood vessels, attracts B-cells, and induces epidermal cell death.
Automated histomorphometric analyses on all samples from all patients (n = 26) were performed to quantitate expression of CD1a+ dendritic cells (A), CD20+ B-cells (B), and CD54 (ICAM-1) expressing cutaneous blood vessels and inflammatory cells within the dermis (C). Expression of both CD20 and CD54 increased rapidly and strongly upon treatment with ingenol mebutate, and actinic keratosis (AK) lesions showed generally higher expression levels compared with uninvolved skin. (D) Dyskeratotic (dead) keratinocytes within the epidermis of all samples (n = 26 patients; five biopsy specimens each) were assessed using a scoring system ranging from 0 (absent, not depicted), 1 (few dyskeratotic cells), 2 (several dead cells) to 3 (numerous necrotic cells). No necrosis was evident in the dermis. TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL)+ apoptotic cells (E) and cleaved caspase 3 (CC3)+ nuclei (F) were determined in biopsies from five patients. A full statistical overview is available in S1 Table.
Fig 6. Topical treatment with ingenol mebutate…
Fig 6. Topical treatment with ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel affects expression of gene clusters relevant for inflammatory and wound healing responses, and induces a characteristic microRNA (miRNA) pattern.
The profiles illustrated are heat-maps and 2-way hierarchical clusterings of deregulated genes of (A) the 95 most variable mRNAs, and (B) the 64 most variable miRNAs across samples (n = 24) for the first six patients in the study. Differentially expressed genes and miRNAs were identified by pair-wise comparison of the following groups: actinic keratosis day 0 (AK0) versus uninvolved skin day 0 (US0), AK2 versus AK0, US2 versus US0, and AK2 versus US2. The expression analysis included variance filtering (VAR >0.2), statistical significance test by analysis of variance (P < 0.01), expression cut-off (>2-fold), and the false-discovery-rate was controlled by the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure (q < 0.05). Microarray data can be found in the GEO repository (GSE63107). Arrows indicate mRNA genes and miRNAs that were selected for validation by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The colors above the heat map indicate: US0 (dark blue, n = 6), US2 (light blue, n = 6), AK0 (green, n = 6), and AK2 (red, n = 6) samples, respectively. The red and green shades on the heatmap represent up- and down-regulated genes, respectively.

References

    1. Babilas P, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM. Actinic keratoses. Hautarzt. 2003; 54:551–6.
    1. Flohil SC, van der Leest RJ, Dowlatshahi EA, Hofman A, de Vries E, Nijsten T. Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: the Rotterdam Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2013; 133:1971–8. 10.1038/jid.2013.134
    1. Memon AA, Tomenson JA, Bothwell J, Friedmann PS. Prevalence of solar damage and actinic keratosis in a Merseyside population. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 142:1154–9.
    1. Rosen T, Lebwohl MG. Prevalence and awareness of actinic keratosis: barriers and opportunities. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013; 68(Suppl. 1):s2–9.
    1. Einspahr JG, Stratton SP, Bowden GT, Alberts DS. Chemoprevention of human skin cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2002; 41:269–85.
    1. Ratushny V, Gober MD, Hick R, Ridky TW, Seykora JT. From keratinocyte to cancer: the pathogenesis and modeling of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122:464–72. 10.1172/JCI57415
    1. Sanmartin O, Guillen C. Images in clinical medicine. Fluorescence diagnosis of subclinical actinic keratoses. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:e21
    1. Cohen JL. Actinic keratosis treatment as a key component of preventive strategies for nonmelanoma skin cancer. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010; 3:39–44.
    1. Fu W, Cockerell CJ. The actinic (solar) keratosis: a 21st-century perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139:66–70.
    1. Ortonne JP. From actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2002; 146(Suppl. 61):20–3.
    1. Padilla RS, Sebastian S, Jiang Z, Nindl I, Larson R. Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146:288–93. 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.378
    1. Roewert-Huber J, Stockfleth E, Kerl H. Pathology and pathobiology of actinic (solar) keratosis—an update. Br J Dermatol. 2007; 157(Suppl. 2):s18–20.
    1. Hurwitz RM, Monger LE. Solar keratosis: an evolving squamous cell carcinoma. Benign or malignant? Dermatol Surg. 1995; 21:184
    1. Mittelbronn MA, Mullins DL, Ramos-Caro FA, Flowers FP. Frequency of pre-existing actinic keratosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 1998; 37:677–81.
    1. Czarnecki DJ, Meehan CJ, Bruce F, Culjak G. The majority of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas arise in actinic keratoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2002; 6:207–9.
    1. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA, Naylor MF, Luque C, Eide MJ, Bingham SF, et al. Actinic keratoses: natural history and risk of transformation in the Veterans Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention Trial. Cancer. 2009; 115:2523–30. 10.1002/cncr.24284
    1. Jørgensen L, McKerrall SJ, Kuttruff CA, Ungeheuer F, Felding J, Baran PS. 14-step synthesis of (+)-ingenol from (+)-3-carene. Science. 2013; 341:878–882. 10.1126/science.1241606
    1. Anderson L, Schmieder GJ, Werschler WP, Tschen EH, Ling MR, Stough DB, et al. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009; 60:934–43. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.008
    1. Ramsay JR, Suhrbier A, Aylward JH, Ogbourne S, Cozzi SJ, Poulsen MG, et al. The sap from Euphorbia peplus is effective against human nonmelanoma skin cancers. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 164:633–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10184.x
    1. Siller G, Gebauer K, Welburn P, Katsamas J, Ogbourne SM. PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) gel, a novel agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicentre, phase IIa study. Australas J Dermatol. 2009; 50:16–22. 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2008.00497.x
    1. Lebwohl M, Swanson N, Anderson LL, Melgaard A, Xu Z, Berman B. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366:1010–19. 10.1056/NEJMoa1111170
    1. Berman B. New developments in the treatment of actinic keratosis: focus on ingenol mebutate gel. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012; 5:111–22. 10.2147/CCID.S28905
    1. Rosen RH, Gupta AK, Tyring SK. Dual mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate gel for topical treatment of actinic keratoses: rapid lesion necrosis followed by lesion-specific immune response. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 66:486–93. 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.12.038
    1. Gillespie SK, Zhang XD, Hersey P. Ingenol 3-angelate induces dual modes of cell death and differentially regulates tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in melanoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004; 3:1651–8.
    1. Ogbourne SM, Suhrbier A, Jones B, Cozzi SJ, Boyle GM, Morris M, et al. Antitumor activity of 3-ingenyl angelate: plasma membrane and mitochondrial disruption and necrotic cell death. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:2833–9.
    1. Stahlhut M, Bertelsen M, Hoyer-Hansen M, Svendsen N, Eriksson AH, Lord JM, et al. Ingenol mebutate: induced cell death patterns in normal and cancer epithelial cells. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012; 11:1181–92.
    1. Hampson P, Chahal H, Khanim F, Hayden R, Mulder A, Assi LK, et al. PEP005, a selective small-molecule activator of protein kinase C, has potent antileukemic activity mediated via the delta isoform of PKC. Blood. 2005; 106:1362–8.
    1. Kedei N, Lundberg DJ, Toth A, Welburn P, Garfield SH, Blumberg PM. Characterization of the interaction of ingenol 3-angelate with protein kinase C. Cancer Res. 2004; 64:3243–55.
    1. Challacombe JM, Suhrbier A, Parsons PG, Jones B, Hampson P, Kavanagh D, et al. Neutrophils are a key component of the antitumor efficacy of topical chemotherapy with ingenol-3-angelate. J Immunol. 2006; 177:8123–32.
    1. Hampson P, Kavanagh D, Smith E, Wang K, Lord JM, ED Rainger G. The anti-tumor agent, ingenol-3-angelate (PEP005), promotes the recruitment of cytotoxic neutrophils by activation of vascular endothelial cells in a PKC-delta dependent manner. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008; 57:1241–51. 10.1007/s00262-008-0458-9
    1. Cozzi SJ, Ogbourne SM, James C, Rebel HG, de Gruijl FR, Ferguson B, et al. Ingenol mebutate field-directed treatment of UVB-damaged skin reduces lesion formation and removes mutant p53 patches. J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132:1263–71. 10.1038/jid.2011.418
    1. Li L, Shukla S, Lee A, Garfield SH, Maloney DJ, Ambudkar SV. The skin cancer chemotherapeutic agent ingenol-3-angelate (PEP005) is a substrate for the epidermal multidrug transporter (ABCB1) and targets tumor vasculature. Cancer Res. 2010; 70:4509–19. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4303
    1. Esmann S, Vinding GR, Christensen KB, Jemec GB. Assessing the influence of actinic keratosis on patients' quality of life: the AKQoL questionnaire. Br J Dermatol. 2013; 168:277–83. 10.1111/bjd.12036
    1. Schön M, Bong AB, Drewniok C, Herz J, Geilen CC, Reifenberger J, et al. Tumor-selective induction of apoptosis and the small-molecule immune response modifier imiquimod. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95:1138–49.
    1. Xu N, Zhang L, Meisgen F, Harada M, Heilborn J, Homey B, et al. MicroRNA-125b down-regulates matrix metallopeptidase 13 and inhibits cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287:29899–908. 10.1074/jbc.M112.391243
    1. Le TT, Gardner J, Hoang-Le D, Schmidt CW, MacDonald KP, Lambley E, et al. Immunostimulatory cancer chemotherapy using local ingenol-3-angelate and synergy with immunotherapies. Vaccine. 2009; 27:3053–62. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.025
    1. Salvesen HG. Caspases and apoptosis. Essays Biochem. 2002; 39:9–19.
    1. Olsnes AM, Ersvaer E, Ryningen A, Paulsen K, Hampson P, Lord JM, et al. The protein kinase C agonist PEP005 increases NF-kappaB expression, induces differentiation and increases constitutive chemokine release by primary acute myeloid leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol. 2009; 145:761–74. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07691.x
    1. Fernández-Figueras MT, Carrato C, Sáenz X, Puig L, Musulen E, Ferrandiz C, Ariza A. Actinic keratosis with atypical basal cells (AK I) is the most common lesion associated with invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.; J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 29:991–7. 10.1111/jdv.12848
    1. Berman B, Goldenberg G, Hanke CW, Tyring SK, Werschler WP, Knudsen KM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ingenol Mebutate 0.015% Gel After Cryosurgery of Actinic Keratosis: 12-Month Results J Drugs Dermatol. 2014; 13:741–747.
    1. Freiberger SN, Cheng PF, Iotzova-Weiss G, Neu J, Liu Q, Dziunycz P, et al. Ingenol Mebutate Signals via PKC/MEK/ERK in Keratinocytes and Induces Interleukin Decoy Receptors IL1R2 and IL13RA2. Mol Cancer Ther. 2015; 14:2132–42 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0023-T
    1. Zibert JR, Løvendorf MB, Litman T, Olsen J, Kaczkowski B, Skov L. MicroRNAs and potential target interactions in psoriasis. J Dermatol Sci. 2010; 58:177–85. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2010.03.004
    1. Divekar AA, Dubey S, Gangalum PR, Singh RR. Dicer insufficiency and microRNA-155 overexpression in lupus regulatory T cells: an apparent paradox in the setting of an inflammatory milieu. J Immunol. 2011; 186:924–30. 10.4049/jimmunol.1002218
    1. Kelada S, Sethupathy P, Okoye IS, Kistasis E, Czieso S, White SD, et al. miR-182 and miR-10a are key regulators of Treg specialisation and stability during Schistosome and Leishmania-associated inflammation. PLoS Pathog. 2013; 9:e1003451 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003451
    1. Makino K, Jinnin M, Kajihara I, Honda N, Sakai K, Masuguchi S, et al. Circulating miR-142-3p levels in patients with systemic sclerosis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012; 37:34–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2011.04158.x
    1. Zidar N, Boštjančič E, Glavač D, Stajer D. MicroRNAs, innate immunity and ventricular rupture in human myocardial infarction. Dis Markers. 2011; 31:259–265. 10.3233/DMA-2011-0827
    1. Nissan X, Denis JA, Saidani M, Lemaitre G, Peschanski M, Baldeschi C. miR-203 modulates epithelial differentiation of human embryonic stem cells towards epidermal stratification. Dev Biol. 2011; 256:506–15.
    1. Chu TH, Yang CC, Liu CJ, Lui MT, Lin SC, Chang KW. miR-211 promotes the progression of head and neck carcinomas by targeting TGFβRII. Cancer Lett. 2013; 337:115–24. 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.05.032
    1. Yi R, Poy MN, Stoffel M, Fuchs E. A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing 'stemness'. Nature. 2008; 452:225–9. 10.1038/nature06642
    1. Dayem MA, Moreilhon C, Turchi L, Magnone V, Christen R, Ponzio G, et al. Early gene expression in wounded human keratinocytes revealed by DNA microarray analysis. Comp Funct Genomics. 2003; 4:47–55. 10.1002/cfg.239
    1. Liang P, Lv C, Jiang B, Long X, Zhang P, Zhang M, et al. MicroRNA profiling in denatured dermis of deep burn patients. Burns. 2012; 38:534–40. 10.1016/j.burns.2011.10.014
    1. Noh H, Hong S, Dong Z, Pan ZK, Jing Q, Huang S. Impaired microRNA processing facilitates breast cancer cell invasion by upregulating urokinase-type plasminogen activator expression. Genes Cancer. 2011; 2:140–50. 10.1177/1947601911408888
    1. Cockerell CJ. Histopathology of incipient intraepidermal squamous cell carcinoma ("actinic keratosis"). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 42(Part 2):11–17.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit