Comparison the effects of paracetamol with sufentanil infusion on postoperative pain control after craniotomy in patients with brain tumor

Ebrahim Hassani, Alireza Mahoori, Shahryar Sane, Arash Tolumehr, Ebrahim Hassani, Alireza Mahoori, Shahryar Sane, Arash Tolumehr

Abstract

Background: Patients experience severe pain after craniotomy surgery that leads to discomfort. Our target in this study that performed in interventional method is an evaluation of sufentanil and paracetamol effect on postoperative pain control in patients undergone craniotomy surgery at Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital.

Materials and methods: Totally, 45 patients between the ages 18 and 65 were studied. The effect of sufentanil and paracetamol medicines in pain management, hemodynamic stability, and side effects compared with control group that were receiving morphine (subcutaneous [SC]) in 3 groups of 15 people at time 0, 2, 4, 12 and 24-h were evaluated. Collected data were included and monitoring blood pressure, O2 Sat, heart rate (HR) and pain, nausea, vomiting and use of morphine.

Results: According to the analysis of results, there was a significant difference between 3 groups on postoperative pain (P < 0.05). In patients that used sufentanil, pain score of visual analog scale (VAS) is lowest and in the paracetamol group the highest VAS score was seen. There was a significant difference in HR between 3 groups (P < 0.05). Maximum average of HR was observed in the paracetamol group. There was a significant difference in mean arterial pressure between 3 groups (P < 0.05). In paracetamol group, there was the highest value (99.3). There was no significant difference in Glasgow Coma scale and SPO2 between 3 groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Sufentanil compared to morphine (which is routinely used for patients pain control after craniotomy surgery) has better pain control, less nausea and vomiting, and better hemodynamic stability. Although paracetamol has the least nausea and vomiting, it has the lowest quality of pain relief.

Keywords: Craniotomy; paracetamol; postoperative pain management; sufentanil; visual analogue scale.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GCS changes in three groups
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean arterial pressure in three groups

References

    1. Cottrell J, Yong W. In: Cottrell and Young's neuroanesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. Postoperative and intensive care including head injury and multisystem sequelae. Cottrell Young's Neuroanesthesia; pp. 410–1.
    1. Morad AH, Winters BD, Yaster M, Stevens RD, White ED, Thompson RE, et al. Efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after supratentorial intracranial surgery: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:343–50.
    1. Vincent J, Abraham E. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2011. Textbook of Critical Care; pp. 1492–3.
    1. Nair S, Rajshekhar V. Evaluation of pain following supratentorial craniotomy. Br J Neurosurg. 2011;25:100–3.
    1. Morad A, Winters B, Stevens R, White E, Weingart J, Yaster M, et al. The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after intracranial surgery of the posterior fossa: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012;114:416–23.
    1. Rahimi SY, Vender JR, Macomson SD, French A, Smith JR, Alleyne CH., Jr Postoperative pain management after craniotomy: Evaluation and cost analysis. Neurosurgery. 2006;59:852–7.
    1. Saha P, Chattopadhyay S, Rudra A, Roy S. Pain after craniotomy: A time for reappraisal? Indian J Pain. 2013;27:7–11.
    1. Lai LT, Ortiz-Cardona JR, Bendo AA. Perioperative pain management in the neurosurgical patient. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:347–67.
    1. Verchère E, Grenier B, Mesli A, Siao D, Sesay M, Maurette P. Postoperative pain management after supratentorial craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2002;14:96–101.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit