Acceptability of Family-Centered Advanced Care Planning for Adolescents With HIV

Ronald H Dallas, Allison Kimmel, Megan L Wilkins, Sohail Rana, Ana Garcia, Yao I Cheng, Jichuan Wang, Maureen E Lyon, Adolescent Palliative Care Consortium., Ronald H Dallas, Allison Kimmel, Megan L Wilkins, Sohail Rana, Ana Garcia, Yao I Cheng, Jichuan Wang, Maureen E Lyon, Adolescent Palliative Care Consortium.

Abstract

Background and objective: Small pilot studies support the appropriateness of engaging adolescents with chronic or life-limiting illnesses in pediatric advance care planning (pACP). We do not yet know if pACP is acceptable, feasible, and worthwhile, even if emotionally intense, in a fully powered randomized controlled trial.

Methods: We conducted a prospective 2-arm randomized controlled trial at 6 US urban hospitals. Adolescent/family member dyads were randomized to receive the 1-session-a-week 3-session FAmily-CEntered Advance Care Planning (FACE) pACP intervention (1, ACP Survey; 2, Goals of Care Conversation/Treatment Preferences; 3, Completion of Advance Directive) or active comparator (1, Developmental History; 2, Safety Tips; 3, Nutrition/Exercise). The Satisfaction Questionnaire was administered to participants independently after each session by a blinded research assistant.

Results: We enrolled 53% of eligible participants and intervened with 97 adolescent/family dyads. Adolescents ranged in age from 14 to 21 years; 54% were male individuals; 93% African American; and 73% perinatally infected. Attendance was 99% for all 3 sessions in each arm. At session 3, FACE adolescents and family dyad members, respectively, found the session useful (98%, 98%) and helpful (98%, 100%), despite feelings of sadness (25%, 17%). FACE adolescents' improvement in the total subscale A score (useful, helpful, like a load off my mind, satisfied, something I needed to do, courageous, worthwhile) was better than control adolescents at session 3 (β = 1.16, P = .02). There were no adverse events.

Conclusions: FACE enabled worthwhile conversations, while simultaneously eliciting intense emotions. No participants withdrew, 99% of those enrolled completed each session, and there were no adverse events, evidence of pACP's feasibility, acceptability, and safety.

Conflict of interest statement

POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Dr Lyon developed and adapted the Satisfaction Questionnaire used to obtain study results. This questionnaire is available without charge on request. The other authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Copyright © 2016 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow of participants through each stage of a randomized clinical trial. Note: Intent to treat design used A: Adolescent; F: Family.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit