Functional gastroduodenal disorders

N J Talley, V Stanghellini, R C Heading, K L Koch, J R Malagelada, G N Tytgat, N J Talley, V Stanghellini, R C Heading, K L Koch, J R Malagelada, G N Tytgat

Abstract

While widely used in research, the 1991 Rome criteria for the gastroduodenal disorders, especially symptom subgroups in dyspepsia, remain contentious. After a comprehensive literature search, a consensus-based approach was applied, supplemented by input from international experts who reviewed the report. Three functional gastroduodenal disorders are defined. Functional dyspepsia is persistent or recurrent pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen; evidence of organic disease likely to explain the symptoms is absent, including at upper endoscopy. Discomfort refers to a subjective, negative feeling that may be characterized by or associated with a number of non-painful symptoms including upper abdominal fullness, early satiety, bloating, or nausea. A dyspepsia subgroup classification is proposed for research purposes, based on the predominant (most bothersome) symptom: (a) ulcer-like dyspepsia when pain (from mild to severe) is the predominant symptom, and (b) dysmotility-like dyspepsia when discomfort (not pain) is the predominant symptom. This classification is supported by recent evidence suggesting that predominant symptoms, but not symptom clusters, identify subgroups with distinct underlying pathophysiological disturbances and responses to treatment. Aerophagia is an unusual complaint characterized by air swallowing that is objectively observed and troublesome repetitive belching. Functional vomiting refers to frequent episodes of recurrent vomiting that is not self-induced nor medication induced, and occurs in the absence of eating disorders, major psychiatric diseases, abnormalities in the gut or central nervous system, or metabolic diseases that can explain the symptom. The current classification requires careful validation but the criteria should be of value in future research.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia. GI, gastrointestinal.

References

    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 Mar;93(3):368-74
    1. Lancet. 1994 Jan 29;343(8892):258-60
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 May;43(5):1001-8
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1989 May;34(5):657-64
    1. Lancet. 1990 Jan 27;335(8683):205-8
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;182:1-6
    1. Gastroenterology. 1992 Apr;102(4 Pt 1):1259-68
    1. Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Jan;38(1):147-54
    1. Gut. 1995 Feb;36(2):189-92
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):107-15
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1995 Apr;9(2):153-60
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1995 Sep;30(9):829-32
    1. Gastroenterology. 1996 Apr;110(4):1036-42
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Apr;91(4):660-73
    1. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Jan;9(1):1-2
    1. Aust N Z J Med. 1975 Dec;5(6):503-6
    1. Lancet. 1988 Mar 12;1(8585):576-9
    1. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997 Feb;32(2):118-25
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1997 May 1;126(9):704-7
    1. Gut. 1997 Mar;40(3):302-6
    1. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997 Jul;72(7):646-52
    1. BMJ. 1997 Nov 15;315(7118):1284-8
    1. Dig Dis. 1997 Nov-Dec;15(6):316-29
    1. Gastroenterology. 1998 Mar;114(3):582-95
    1. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 May;10(5):367-70
    1. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998 Jun;26(4):312-20
    1. Gut. 1998 May;42(5):690-5
    1. Gastroenterology. 1998 Dec;115(6):1586-8
    1. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1998 Nov;12(11):1055-65
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 24;339(26):1928-30
    1. Can J Gastroenterol. 1998 Jan-Feb;12(1):83-90

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit