Rapid diagnostic tests compared with malaria microscopy for guiding outpatient treatment of febrile illness in Tanzania: randomised trial

Abstract

Objective: To compare rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria with routine microscopy in guiding treatment decisions for febrile patients.

Design: Randomised trial.

Setting: Outpatient departments in northeast Tanzania at varying levels of malaria transmission.

Participants: 2416 patients for whom a malaria test was requested.

Intervention: Staff received training on rapid diagnostic tests; patients sent for malaria tests were randomised to rapid diagnostic test or routine microscopy

Main outcome measure: Proportion of patients with a negative test prescribed an antimalarial drug.

Results: Of 7589 outpatient consultations, 2425 (32%) had a malaria test requested. Of 1204 patients randomised to microscopy, 1030 (86%) tested negative for malaria; 523 (51%) of these were treated with an antimalarial drug. Of 1193 patients randomised to rapid diagnostic test, 1005 (84%) tested negative; 540 (54%) of these were treated for malaria (odds ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.34; P=0.18). Children aged under 5 with negative rapid diagnostic tests were more likely to be prescribed an antimalarial drug than were those with negative slides (P=0.003). Patients with a negative test by any method were more likely to be prescribed an antibiotic (odds ratio 6.42, 4.72 to 8.75; P<0.001). More than 90% of prescriptions for antimalarial drugs in low-moderate transmission settings were for patients for whom a test requested by a clinician was negative for malaria.

Conclusions: Although many cases of malaria are missed outside the formal sector, within it malaria is massively over-diagnosed. This threatens the sustainability of deployment of artemisinin combination treatment, and treatable bacterial diseases are likely to be missed. Use of rapid diagnostic tests, with basic training for clinical staff, did not in itself lead to any reduction in over-treatment for malaria. Interventions to improve clinicians' management of febrile illness are essential but will not be easy.

Trial registration: Clinical trials NCT00146796 [ClinicalTrials.gov].

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Fig 1 Total clinic attendances and patients recruited to study by malaria test result and antimalarial treatment prescribed. Data missing from nine patients randomised to rapid diagnostic test (eight missing test result, one missing age) and 10 patients randomised to slide testing (nine missing slide result, one missing age)

Fig 2 Clinic attendances, malaria test results, and antimalarial treatment prescribed at each of the study sites. *Data are shown for cases with complete data; 3, 3, and 13 cases had incomplete data in the low, low-moderate, and high transmission sites. †Positive test results at low, low-moderate, and high transmission hospitals were: rapid diagnostic test 3, 15, and 168; blood slide 1, 53, and 168. All but five patients with positive tests results were treated with an antimalarial drug; reason for omission of treatment in these five not known