Clinical utility of a plasma-based miRNA signature classifier within computed tomography lung cancer screening: a correlative MILD trial study

Gabriella Sozzi, Mattia Boeri, Marta Rossi, Carla Verri, Paola Suatoni, Francesca Bravi, Luca Roz, Davide Conte, Michela Grassi, Nicola Sverzellati, Alfonso Marchiano, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia, Ugo Pastorino, Gabriella Sozzi, Mattia Boeri, Marta Rossi, Carla Verri, Paola Suatoni, Francesca Bravi, Luca Roz, Davide Conte, Michela Grassi, Nicola Sverzellati, Alfonso Marchiano, Eva Negri, Carlo La Vecchia, Ugo Pastorino

Abstract

Purpose: Recent screening trial results indicate that low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality in high-risk patients. However, high false-positive rates, costs, and potential harms highlight the need for complementary biomarkers. The diagnostic performance of a noninvasive plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC) was retrospectively evaluated in samples prospectively collected from smokers within the randomized Multicenter Italian Lung Detection (MILD) trial.

Patients and methods: Plasma samples from 939 participants, including 69 patients with lung cancer and 870 disease-free individuals (n = 652, LDCT arm; n = 287, observation arm) were analyzed by using a quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction-based assay for MSC. Diagnostic performance of MSC was evaluated in a blinded validation study that used prespecified risk groups.

Results: The diagnostic performance of MSC for lung cancer detection was 87% for sensitivity and 81% for specificity across both arms, and 88% and 80%, respectively, in the LDCT arm. For all patients, MSC had a negative predictive value of 99% and 99.86% for detection and death as a result of disease, respectively. LDCT had sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 81% with a false-positive rate of 19.4%. Diagnostic performance of MSC was confirmed by time dependency analysis. Combination of both MSC and LDCT resulted in a five-fold reduction of LDCT false-positive rate to 3.7%. MSC risk groups were significantly associated with survival (χ1(2) = 49.53; P < .001).

Conclusion: This large validation study indicates that MSC has predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic value and could reduce the false-positive rate of LDCT, thus improving the efficacy of lung cancer screening.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram (The Multicentric Italian Lung Detection [MILD] study, 2005 to 2012). LDCT, low-dose computed tomography.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Three-year survival from date of blood sample collection according to microRNA (miRNA) signature classifier among all patients (Multicentric Italian Lung Detection [MILD] study, 2005 to 2012). (*) No death occurred due to other causes in lung cancer–free participants.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit