Regional differences in the patient population of general practices in northern Germany: results of a mixed-methods study

Heike Hansen, Ingmar Schäfer, Nadine Janis Pohontsch, Agata Kazek, Hanna Hardt, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer, Heike Hansen, Ingmar Schäfer, Nadine Janis Pohontsch, Agata Kazek, Hanna Hardt, Dagmar Lühmann, Martin Scherer

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to explore patient types in general practitioner (GP) practices and to quantify the regional differences of the frequencies of these patient types in northern Germany.

Design and setting: We conducted a mixed-methods study based on focus groups and standardised interviews with GPs. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were assigned one of three regional categories (urban areas, environs, rural areas). The focus groups were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Relative frequencies of consultations by patient types and differences between the regions were calculated. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify differences among regions.

Participants: Nine focus groups with 65 GPs (67.7% male). From the 280 initially recruited GPs 211 (65.4% male) could be personally interviewed.

Results: Four themes with 27 patient types were derived from the focus groups: patients classified by morbidity, sociodemographic characteristics, special care needs and patient behaviour. Five patient characteristics were significantly more prevalent in urban areas than rural areas: patients with migration background and culturally different disease concepts (OR 1.23; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.42), privately insured patients (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31), educationally disadvantaged patients with low health literacy (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.19), patients with psychiatric disorders (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.12) and senior citizens living on their own without caregivers (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31). Three patient types were significantly less prevalent in urban areas: minors accompanied by their parents (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.83), patients with poor therapy adherence (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.95) and patients with dementia (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99).

Conclusions: GPs could compensate the specific needs of their patients with medical training aligned with the requirements of their region. Urban GPs need skills treating patients with psychiatric, social and cultural problems, rural GPs regarding the care for children or noncompliant patients.

Trial registration number: NCT02558322.

Keywords: epidemiology; primary care; qualitative research.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Albrecht M, Etgeton S, Ochmann RR. Faktencheck Gesundheit - Regionale Verteilung von Arztsitzen (Ärztedichte) - Haus-.Kinder-, Frauen- und Augenärzte. Available: [Accessed 18 Mar 2016].
    1. Weinhold I, Gurtner S. Understanding shortages of sufficient health care in rural areas. Health Policy 2014;118:201–14. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.07.018
    1. Schäfer I, Hansen H, Ruppel T, et al. . Regional differences in reasons for consultation and general practitioners’ spectrum of services in northern Germany – results of a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:1–12. 10.1186/s12875-020-1093-6
    1. Steinhäuser J, Jäkel K, Szecsenyi J, et al. . Prozeduren, die in Der Allgemeinmedizin durchgeführt werden – eine Querschnittstudie. Gesundheitswesen 2017;79:1004–11.
    1. Steinhaeuser J, Joos S, Szecsenyi J, et al. . A comparison of the workload of rural and urban primary care physicians in Germany: analysis of a questionnaire survey. BMC Fam Pract 2011;12:112. 10.1186/1471-2296-12-112
    1. Pochert M, Voigt K, Bortz M, et al. . The workload for home visits by German family practitioners: an analysis of regional variation in a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract 2019;20:3. 10.1186/s12875-018-0891-6
    1. Wenghofer EF, Kam SM, Timony PE, et al. . Geographic variation in FP and GP scope of practice in Ontario: comparative provincial study. Can Fam Physician 2018;64:e274–82.
    1. Pohontsch NJ, Hansen H, Schäfer I, et al. . General practitioners' perception of being a doctor in urban vs. rural regions in Germany - A focus group study. Fam Pract 2018;35:209–15. 10.1093/fampra/cmx083
    1. Fenton JJ, Magnan EM, Jerant A, et al. . Patient characteristics associated with making requests during primary care visits. J Am Board Fam Med 2019;32:201–8. 10.3122/jabfm.2019.02.180218
    1. Ferroni E, Casotto V, Pigato M, et al. . Patient and general practitioner characteristics influencing the management of non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Italy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;116:192–201. 10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.038
    1. van den Bussche H, Kaduszkiewicz H, Schäfer I, et al. . Overutilization of ambulatory medical care in the elderly German population?--An empirical study based on national insurance claims data and a review of foreign studies. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:129. 10.1186/s12913-016-1357-y
    1. Collins MM, Bradley CP, O'Sullivan T, et al. . Self-Care coping strategies in people with diabetes: a qualitative exploratory study. BMC Endocr Disord 2009;9:6. 10.1186/1472-6823-9-6
    1. Mukhtar TK, Bankhead C, Stevens S, et al. . Factors associated with consultation rates in general practice in England, 2013-2014: a cross-sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2018;68:e370–7. 10.3399/bjgp18X695981
    1. Carr-Hill RA, Rice N, Roland M. Socioeconomic determinants of rates of consultation in general practice based on fourth national morbidity survey of general practices. BMJ 1996;312:1008–12. 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1008
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2 edn Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage, 2011.
    1. Schäfer I, Hansen H, Pohontsch N, et al. . Regional variation of patient behaviour and reasons for consultation in the general practice of northern Germany: protocol for an observational study. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010738. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010738
    1. Hansen H, Pohontsch NJ, Bole L, et al. . Regional variations of perceived problems in ambulatory care from the perspective of general practitioners and their patients - an exploratory focus group study in urban and rural regions of northern Germany. BMC Fam Pract 2017;18:68. 10.1186/s12875-017-0637-x
    1. BBSR Homepage - Siedlungsstrukturelle Kreistypen - Laufende Raumbeobachtung - Raumabgrenzungen. Available: [Accessed 27 May 2019].
    1. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz Verlagsgruppe, 2010.
    1. Potter J, Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage, 1997.
    1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV) Region, 2020. Available: [Accessed 29 Sep 2020].
    1. Oltrogge JH, Schäfer I, Schlichting D, et al. . Episodes of care in a primary care walk-in clinic at a refugee camp in Germany - a retrospective data analysis. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:193. 10.1186/s12875-020-01253-3
    1. Belz M, Belz M, Özkan I, et al. . Posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression among refugees: assessment of a sample from a German refugee reception center. Transcult Psychiatry 2017;54:595–610. 10.1177/1363461517745473
    1. Thompson B. Stepwise regression and stepwise discriminant analysis need not apply here: a guidelines editorial, 2016.
    1. Altman DG, Andersen PK. Bootstrap investigation of the stability of a COX regression model. Stat Med 1989;8:771–83. 10.1002/sim.4780080702
    1. Stevens S, Bankhead C, Mukhtar T, et al. . Patient-Level and practice-level factors associated with consultation duration: a cross-sectional analysis of over one million consultations in English primary care. BMJ Open 2017;7:e018261. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018261
    1. Britt HC, Valenti L, Miller GC. Determinants of consultation length in Australian general practice. Med J Aust 2005;183:68–71. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb06924.x
    1. Scaife B, Gill P, Heywood P, et al. . Socio-Economic characteristics of adult frequent attenders in general practice: secondary analysis of data. Fam Pract 2000;17:298–304. 10.1093/fampra/17.4.298
    1. Dreyer K, Steventon A, Fisher R, et al. . The association between living alone and health care utilisation in older adults: a retrospective cohort study of electronic health records from a London general practice. BMC Geriatr 2018;18:269. 10.1186/s12877-018-0939-4
    1. Görig T, Diehl K, Herr RM, et al. . Stadt-Land-Unterschiede Im Angebot von Lebensstilberatung Zur Prävention kardiovaskulärer Erkrankungen in Der Hausarztpraxis. Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Hausärztebefragung. Gesundheitswesen 2016;78:533–8.
    1. Statista Ausländeranteil in Deutschland nach Bundesländern, 2018. Available: [Accessed 02 Apr 2020].
    1. Sampson L, Ettman CK, Galea S. Urbanization, urbanicity, and depression: a review of the recent global literature. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2020;33:233–44. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000588
    1. Purtle J, Nelson KL, Yang Y, et al. . Urban-Rural differences in older adult depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Am J Prev Med 2019;56:603–13. 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.008
    1. Breslau J, Marshall GN, Pincus HA, et al. . Are mental disorders more common in urban than rural areas of the United States? J Psychiatr Res 2014;56:50–5. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.05.004
    1. Paykel ES, Abbott R, Jenkins R, et al. . Urban-Rural mental health differences in Great Britain: findings from the National morbidity survey. Psychol Med 2000;30:269–80. 10.1017/S003329179900183X
    1. Peen J, Schoevers RA, Beekman AT, et al. . The current status of urban-rural differences in psychiatric disorders. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010;121:84–93. 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01438.x
    1. Szöke A, Charpeaud T, Galliot A-M, et al. . Rural-Urban variation in incidence of psychosis in France: a prospective epidemiologic study in two contrasted catchment areas. BMC Psychiatry 2014;14:78. 10.1186/1471-244X-14-78
    1. Gruebner O, Rapp MA, Adli M, et al. . Cities and mental health. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2017;114:121–7. 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0121
    1. Kluge U, Rapp MA, Mehran N, et al. . [Poverty, migration and mental health]. Nervenarzt 2019;90:1103–8. 10.1007/s00115-019-00790-2
    1. Fryers T, Melzer D, Jenkins R. Social inequalities and the common mental disorders: a systematic review of the evidence. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2003;38:229–37. 10.1007/s00127-003-0627-2
    1. Koller D, Eisele M, Kaduszkiewicz H, et al. . Ambulatory health services utilization in patients with dementia - Is there an urban-rural difference? Int J Health Geogr 2010;9:59. 10.1186/1476-072X-9-59
    1. Herrmann WJ, Berlt B, Spengler V, et al. . Do family Physiciany in Germany practices treat children and adolescents? A Representive survey among Familiy practices in Berlin and brandenburg. Z Allg Med 2018;94:390–5.
    1. Zi Hausärzte auf dem Land: Höherer Verdienst bei mehr Stunden und höherem Stundensatz, 2020. Available: [Accessed 07 May 2020].
    1. Hansen H, Schäfer I, Porzelt S, et al. . Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:110. 10.1186/s12875-020-01180-3
    1. Bundesaerztekammer Fortbildung als immanenter Bestandteil der ärztlichen Tätigkeit, 2020. Available: [Accessed 03 Oct 2020].
    1. Degam Fortbildungssuche: Fortbildungsmaßnahmen, die bundesweit für das ärztliche Fortbildungszertifikat anerkannt sind, 2017. Available: [Accessed 03 Oct 2020].
    1. Steinhäuser J. Competence-Based Curriculum General Practice, 2019. Available: [Accessed 03 Oct 2020].

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit