Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Arterial Stiffness in a Countryside Area of Switzerland: Insights from the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study

Lucrezia Pusterla, Dragana Radovanovic, Franco Muggli, Paul Erne, Andreas W Schoenenberger, Renate Schoenenberger-Berzins, Gianfranco Parati, Paolo Suter, Sebastiano A G Lava, Augusto Gallino, Mario G Bianchetti, Lucrezia Pusterla, Dragana Radovanovic, Franco Muggli, Paul Erne, Andreas W Schoenenberger, Renate Schoenenberger-Berzins, Gianfranco Parati, Paolo Suter, Sebastiano A G Lava, Augusto Gallino, Mario G Bianchetti

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Besides traditional cardiovascular risk factors, arterial stiffness is a recognized predictor of cardiovascular risk.

Methods: We investigated the relationship between traditional cardiovascular risk factors, sex, and aortic pulse wave velocity in subjects living in a countryside area of Southern Switzerland. For this aim, we performed a cross-sectional analysis of data from adult participants of the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study, which, initiated in 2015, follows health status and disease risk factors in a Swiss countryside cohort at least 6 years of age.

Results: A total of 387 people (205 women and 182 men) were included. Hyperlipidemia, overweight, and obesity were more common (p ≤ 0.001) and LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and hemoglobin A1c were higher (p < 0.03) in men than women. Systolic and diastolic brachial and aortic blood pressures were higher in men (p < 0.02), whereas aortic pulse wave velocity and aortic pulse pressure were higher in women (p < 0.05). The aortic pulse wave velocity was significantly higher in subjects with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and obesity, and significantly increased with age (p < 0.0001). Multiple linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between pulse wave velocity and age, female sex, brachial systolic blood pressure, and heart rate (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: Also in a countryside area, the aortic pulse wave velocity is higher in subjects with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes and obesity, and significantly increases with age. Furthermore, with advancing age, aortic pulse wave velocity is higher in women than men.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02282748.

Keywords: Arterial hypertension; Cardiovascular risk; Country; Pulse wave velocity; Rural; Sex.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of study participants
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Impact of age and sex on unadjusted aortic pulse wave velocity. Men (blue rectangles) and women (orange rectangles) are given different symbols. Results are presented as boxplots

References

    1. GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1151–210. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9.
    1. Falk E, Nakano M, Bentzon JF, Finn AV, Virmani R. Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists' view. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(10):719–728. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs411.
    1. Csige I, Ujvárosy D, Szabó Z, et al. The impact of obesity on the cardiovascular system. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:3407306. doi: 10.1155/2018/3407306.
    1. Strain WD, Paldánius PM. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the microcirculation. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0703-2.
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):1269–1324. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066.
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, et al. 2018 practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology: ESH/ESC task force for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2018;36(12):2284–2309. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001961.
    1. Conklin DJ, Schick S, Blaha MJ, et al. Cardiovascular injury induced by tobacco products: assessment of risk factors and biomarkers of harm. A Tobacco Centers of Regulatory Science compilation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019;316(4):H801–H827. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00591.2018.
    1. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(13):1318–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.061.
    1. Ben-Shlomo Y, Spears M, Boustred C, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(7):636–646. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.063.
    1. Townsend RR, Wilkinson IB, Schiffrin EL, et al. Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2015;66(3):698–722. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000033.
    1. Pierce GL. Mechanisms and subclinical consequences of aortic stiffness. Hypertension. 2017;70(5):848–853. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.08933.
    1. Horváth IG, Németh A, Lenkey Z, et al. Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2010;28(10):2068–2075. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833c8a1a.
    1. Marčun Varda N, Močnik M. Pulse wave velocity, central haemodynamic parameters, and markers of kidney function in children. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2022;47(1):43–49. doi: 10.1159/000519340.
    1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(21):2588–2605. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl254.
    1. Wang K, Lombard J, Rundek T, et al. Relationship of neighborhood greenness to heart disease in 249 405 US medicare beneficiaries. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e010258. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010258.
    1. Han SJ, Lee SH. Nontraditional risk factors for obesity in modern society. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021;30(2):93–103. doi: 10.7570/jomes21004.
    1. Schoenenberger AW, Muggli F, Parati G, et al. Protocol of the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study (SWICOS) in rural Switzerland. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e013280. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013280.
    1. Lepori L, Radovanovic D, Schoenenberger AW, et al. Age-dependency of cardiometabolic risk and protective factors in females living in a countryside area of Switzerland. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2021;110(5):252–256. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a003622.
    1. Schoenenberger AW, Radovanovic D, Muggli F, et al. Prevalence of ideal cardiovascular health in a community-based population—results from the Swiss Longitudinal Cohort Study (SWICOS) Swiss Med Wkly. 2021;151:w30040. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30040.
    1. Adler C, Ellert U, Neuhauser HK. Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values. Blood Press Monit. 2014;19(2):109–117. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000037.
    1. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens. 2012;30(3):445–448. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834fa8b0.
    1. Ogola BO, Zimmerman MA, Clark GL, et al. New insights into arterial stiffening: does sex matter? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2018;315(5):H1073–H1087. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00132.2018.
    1. Lee HY, Oh BH. Aging and arterial stiffness. Circ J. 2010;74(11):2257–2262. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-0910.
    1. Pfeilschifter J, Köditz R, Pfohl M, Schatz H. Changes in proinflammatory cytokine activity after menopause. Endocr Rev. 2002;23(1):90–119. doi: 10.1210/edrv.23.1.0456.
    1. Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(19):2338–2350. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165.
    1. Staessen JA, van der Heijden-Spek JJ, Safar ME, et al. Menopause and the characteristics of the large arteries in a population study. J Hum Hypertens. 2001;15(8):511–518. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001226.
    1. Nichols WW, Edwards DG. Arterial elastance and wave reflection augmentation of systolic blood pressure: deleterious effects and implications for therapy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2001;6(1):5–21. doi: 10.1177/107424840100600102.
    1. McVeigh GE, Bratteli CW, Morgan DJ, et al. Age-related abnormalities in arterial compliance identified by pressure pulse contour analysis: aging and arterial compliance. Hypertension. 1999;33(6):1392–1398. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.33.6.1392.
    1. Gangadharan N, Venkatachalapathi A, Jebaraj B, et al. Electrical modelling of tissue experiments confirms precise locations of resistance and compliance in systemic arterial tree-they are mutually exclusive. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2022;49(2):242–253. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13606.
    1. ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. 2013 Practice guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC): ESH/ESC Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2013;31(10):1925–1938. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328364ca4c.
    1. Westerhof BE, van den Wijngaard JP, Murgo JP, Westerhof N. Location of a reflection site is elusive: consequences for the calculation of aortic pulse wave velocity. Hypertension. 2008;52(3):478–483. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.116525.
    1. Baulmann J, Schillings U, Rickert S. A new oscillometric method for assessment of arterial stiffness: comparison with tonometric and piezo-electronic methods. J Hypertens. 2008;26(3):523–528. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3282f314f7.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit