Time-Dependent Impact of Sex on the Long-Term Outcomes After Left Main Revascularization

Yong-Hoon Yoon, Jung-Min Ahn, Jung Bok Lee, Do-Yoon Kang, Hanbit Park, Yeong Jin Jeong, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Yujin Yang, Junho Hyun, Pil Hyung Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park, Yong-Hoon Yoon, Jung-Min Ahn, Jung Bok Lee, Do-Yoon Kang, Hanbit Park, Yeong Jin Jeong, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Yujin Yang, Junho Hyun, Pil Hyung Lee, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park

Abstract

Background There are still limited data about the differential effect of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease. This extended follow-up study of the MAIN-COMPARE (Ten-Year Outcomes of Stents Versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) registry evaluated clinical outcomes beyond 10 years. Methods and Results Of 2240 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (PCI=1102 and CABG=1138), all-cause mortality, the composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, or stroke, and target vessel revascularization were separately evaluated in both sexes. Of 2240 patients, 631 (28.2%) were women and 1609 (71.8%) were men. Women had lower 10-year incidences of death and serious composite outcomes than men. The adjusted 10-year risks of adverse outcomes were similar in men. However, the adjusted 10-year risks were different according to a prespecified period in women. In the short-term (0-1 year) period, PCI had a significantly lower risk for serious composite outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.91; P=0.03) compared with CABG. The adjusted risks for death and serious composite outcomes were significantly higher after PCI than after CABG, during the midterm (1-5 years) period (death; adjusted HR, 3.99; 95% CI, 2.01-7.92; P<0.001 and composite outcome; adjusted HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.59-5.39; P=0.001). Beyond 5 years, adjusted risks were similar after PCI and CABG in women. Conclusions In this 10-year extended follow-up study of patients undergoing left main coronary artery revascularization, we observed a time-dependent impact of sex on the long-term outcomes after PCI and CABG, especially in women, with significant interactions. However, these results warrant confirmation on larger series of studies. Registration URl: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02791412.

Keywords: coronary artery bypass surgery; left main coronary artery disease; outcomes; percutaneous coronary intervention; sex.

Figures

Figure 1. Crude 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier curves for…
Figure 1. Crude 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier curves for clinical events stratified by sex and revascularization strategies in the overall cohort.
A, Death. B, Death, Q‐wave myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. C, Target vessel revascularization. CABG, indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2. Adjusted 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier curves for…
Figure 2. Adjusted 10‐year Kaplan‐Meier curves for clinical events stratified by sex and revascularization strategies in the overall cohort.
A, Death. B, Death, Q‐wave myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke. C, Target vessel revascularization. CABG indicates coronary artery bypass grafting; and PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 3. Impact of sex on the…
Figure 3. Impact of sex on the relative risks for clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
MI indicates myocardial infarction; and TVR, target vessel revascularization.

References

    1. Lee PH, Ahn J‐M, Chang M, Baek S, Yoon S‐H, Kang S‐J, Lee S‐W, Kim Y‐H, Lee CW, Park S‐W, et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1233–1246. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.089
    1. Park DW, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Taggart DP. Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main disease: SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, EXCEL and NOBLE—combined cardiology and cardiac surgery perspective. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;7:521–526. doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.04.04
    1. Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice M‐C, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Karmpaliotis D, Brown WM, Lembo NJ, et al. Five‐year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1820–1830. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909406
    1. Holm NR, Mäkikallio T, Lindsay MM, Spence MS, Erglis A, Menown IBA, Trovik T, Kellerth T, Kalinauskas G, Mogensen LJH, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5‐year outcomes from the randomised, non‐inferiority noble trial. Lancet. 2020;395:191–199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1
    1. Park DW, Ahn JM, Yun SC, Yoon YH, Kang DY, Lee PH, Lee SW, Park SW, Seung KB, Gwon HC, et al. 10‐year outcomes of stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2813–2822. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.012
    1. Park D‐W, Ahn J‐M, Park H, Yun S‐C, Kang D‐Y, Lee PH, Kim Y‐H, Lim D‐S, Rha S‐W, Park G‐M, et al. Ten‐year outcomes after drug‐eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow‐up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation. 2020;141:1437–1446. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046039
    1. Thuijs DJFM, Kappetein AP, Serruys PW, Mohr F‐W, Morice M‐C, Mack MJ, Holmes DR, Curzen N, Davierwala P, Noack T, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with three‐vessel or left main coronary artery disease: 10‐year follow‐up of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2019;394:1325–1334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31997-X
    1. Ruel M, Falk V, Farkouh ME, Freemantle N, Gaudino MF, Glineur D, Cameron DE, Taggart DP. Myocardial revascularization trials. Circulation. 2018;138:2943–2951. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035970
    1. Park DW, Park SJ. Percutaneous coronary intervention of left main disease: pre‐ and post‐EXCEL (evaluation of XIENCE everolimus eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass surgery for effectiveness of left main revascularization) and noble (Nordic‐Baltic‐British left main revascularization study) era. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e004792. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.004792
    1. Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack M, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet. 2013;381:639–650. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60108-7
    1. Farooq V, Serruys PW, Bourantas C, Vranckx P, Diletti R, Garcia Garcia HM, Holmes DR, Kappetein A‐P, Mack M, Feldman T, et al. Incidence and multivariable correlates of long‐term mortality in patients treated with surgical or percutaneous revascularization in the synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:3105–3113. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs367
    1. Sotomi Y, Onuma Y, Cavalcante R, Ahn J‐M, Lee CW, van Klaveren D, de Winter RJ, Wykrzykowska JJ, Farooq V, Morice M‐C, et al. Geographical difference of the interaction of sex with treatment strategy in patients with multivessel disease and left main disease: a meta‐analysis from syntax (synergy between PCI with TAXUS and cardiac surgery), PRECOMBAT (bypass surgery versus angioplasty using Sirolimus‐Eluting stent in patients with left main coronary artery disease), and best (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus‐Eluting Stent implantation in the treatment of patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:e005027. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005027
    1. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, Ahn J‐M, Boersma E, Christiansen EH, Domanski MJ, Farkouh ME, Flather M, Fuster V, et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018;391:939–948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30423-9
    1. Serruys PW, Cavalcante R, Collet C, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Banning AP, Taggart DP, Sabaté M, Pomar J, Boonstra PW, et al. Outcomes after coronary stenting or bypass surgery for men and women with unprotected left main disease: the excel trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1234–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.051
    1. Park H, Ahn J‐M, Yoon Y‐H, Kwon O, Lee K, Kang D‐Y, Lee PH, Lee S‐W, Park S‐W, Park D‐W, et al. Effect of age and sex on outcomes after stenting or bypass surgery in left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:678–687. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.061
    1. Hara H, Takahashi K, van Klaveren D, Wang R, Garg S, Ono M, Kawashima H, Gao C, Mack M, Holmes DR, et al. Sex differences in all‐cause mortality in the decade following complex coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:889–899.
    1. Seung KB, Park D‐W, Kim Y‐H, Lee S‐W, Lee CW, Hong M‐K, Park S‐W, Yun S‐C, Gwon H‐C, Jeong M‐H, et al. Stents versus coronary‐artery bypass grafting for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1781–1792. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801441
    1. Park D‐W, Seung KB, Kim Y‐H, Lee J‐Y, Kim W‐J, Kang S‐J, Lee S‐W, Lee CW, Park S‐W, Yun S‐C, et al. Long‐term safety and efficacy of stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 5‐year results from the main‐compare (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.004
    1. Taggart DP, Gaudino M. PCI or CABG for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:290–291. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2000645
    1. Rosenbaum PR. Model‐based direct adjustment. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:387–394. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478441
    1. Cole SR, Hernan MA. Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2004;75:45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2003.10.004
    1. Mosca L, Barrett‐Connor E, Wenger NK. Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes. Circulation. 2011;124:2145–2154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.968792
    1. Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S, Salamon R. European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardio‐Thorac Surg. 1999;16:9–13. doi: 10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00134-7
    1. Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Eiken MC, DeLong ER, Chen A, Ferguson TB Jr, Grover FL, Edwards FH. The society of thoracic surgeons: 30‐day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(6):1856–1865; discussion 1864–1855. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00179-6
    1. Piña IL, Zheng QI, She L, Szwed H, Lang IM, Farsky PS, Castelvecchio S, Biernat J, Paraforos A, Kosevic D, et al. Sex difference in patients with ischemic heart failure undergoing surgical revascularization: results from the stich trial (surgical treatment for ischemic heart failure). Circulation. 2018;137:771–780. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030526
    1. Johnston A, Mesana TG, Lee DS, Eddeen AB, Sun LY. Sex differences in long‐term survival after major cardiac surgery: a population‐based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013260. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013260
    1. Huckaby LV, Seese LM, Sultan I, Gleason TG, Wang Y, Thoma F, Kilic A. The impact of sex on outcomes after revascularization for multivessel coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:1243–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.026
    1. Takagi K, Chieffo A, Shannon J, Naganuma T, Tahara S, Fujino Y, Latib A, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Kawamoto H, et al. Impact of gender on long‐term mortality in patients with unprotected left main disease: the Milan and New‐Tokyo (MITO) Registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016;17:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.05.007
    1. Shin E‐S, Lee CW, Ahn J‐M, Lee PH, Chang M, Kim M‐J, Yoon S‐H, Park D‐W, Kang S‐J, Lee S‐W, et al. Sex differences in left main coronary artery stenting: different characteristics but similar outcomes for women compared with men. Int J Cardiol. 2018;253:50–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.051
    1. Stefanini GG, Kalesan B, Pilgrim T, Raber L, Onuma Y, Silber S, Serruys PW, Meier B, Juni P, Windecker S. Impact of sex on clinical and angiographic outcomes among patients undergoing revascularization with drug‐eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:301–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.11.011
    1. Anderson ML, Peterson ED, Brennan JM, Rao SV, Dai D, Anstrom KJ, Piana R, Popescu A, Sedrakyan A, Messenger JC, et al. Short‐ and long‐term outcomes of coronary stenting in women versus men: results from the national cardiovascular data registry centers for medicare & medicaid services cohort. Circulation. 2012;126:2190–2199. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.111369
    1. Kosmidou I, Leon MB, Zhang Y, Serruys PW, von Birgelen C, Smits PC, Ben‐Yehuda O, Redfors B, Madhavan MV, Maehara A, et al. Long‐term outcomes in women and men following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1631–1640.
    1. Serruys PW, Morice M‐C, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Ståhle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary‐artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:961–972. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804626
    1. Alexander JH, Smith PK. Coronary‐artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:e22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1608042
    1. Aggarwal NR, Patel HN, Mehta LS, Sanghani RM, Lundberg GP, Lewis SJ, Mendelson MA, Wood MJ, Volgman AS, Mieres JH. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease: advances, obstacles, and next steps. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11:e004437. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004437

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit