Safety and efficacy of Pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: PALETTE (EORTC 62072) subgroup analyses

Axel Le Cesne, Sebastian Bauer, George D Demetri, Guangyang Han, Luca Dezzani, Qasim Ahmad, Jean-Yves Blay, Ian Judson, Patrick Schöffski, Massimo Aglietta, Peter Hohenberger, Hans Gelderblom, Axel Le Cesne, Sebastian Bauer, George D Demetri, Guangyang Han, Luca Dezzani, Qasim Ahmad, Jean-Yves Blay, Ian Judson, Patrick Schöffski, Massimo Aglietta, Peter Hohenberger, Hans Gelderblom

Abstract

Background: PALETTE is a phase 3 trial that demonstrated single-agent activity of pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcomas (aSTS). We performed retrospective subgroup analyses to explore potential relationships between patient characteristics, prior lines of therapy, dose intensity, and dose modifications on safety and efficacy of pazopanib in aSTS.

Methods: PALETTE compared pazopanib with placebo in patients with aSTS (age ≥ 18 years) whose disease had progressed during or following prior chemotherapy. In these subgroup analyses, median progression-free survival (mPFS) among patients receiving pazopanib was the efficacy outcome of interest. Adverse events (AEs) were also compared within subgroups. All analyses were descriptive and exploratory.

Results: A total of 246 patients received pazopanib in the PALETTE study. The mPFS was longer in patients who had only 1 prior line versus 2+ prior lines of therapy (24.7 vs 18.9 weeks, respectively); AE rates were similar regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. The mPFS was similar in patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 y (20.0 and 20.1 weeks, respectively). Although AEs leading to study discontinuation were higher in older patients (≥65 y, 30%; < 65 y, 17%), rates of dose reductions, dose interruptions, and serious AEs were similar between the 2 age groups. No reduction in mPFS was noted in patients requiring dose reductions or dose interruptions to manage toxicities.

Conclusions: Longer mPFS was observed in patients receiving pazopanib following only 1 line of therapy. Additionally, mPFS with pazopanib was maintained regardless of patient age or dose modifications used to manage toxicity.

Trial registration: NCT00753688 , first posted September 16, 2008 (registered prospectively).

Keywords: Advanced soft tissue sarcoma; PALETTE subgroup analysis; Pazopanib; Progression-free survival.

Conflict of interest statement

ALC received honoraria from Pfizer, Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Bayer.

SB received grants/research support from Novartis, Incyte, and Blueprint Medicine; received honoraria or consultation fees from Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Deciphera, Bayer, and Nanobiotix.

GDD received consulting fees from Novartis, Pfizer, EMD-Serono, Sanofi Oncology, Janssen Oncology, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, Mirati Therapeutics, Epizyme, PharmaMar, Daiichi-Sankyo, WIRB Copernicus Group, Ziopharm, and Polaris Pharmaceuticals; received research support to Dana-Farber from Bayer, Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen Oncology, Ignyta, Loxo Oncology, AbbVie, Epizyme, and Adaptimmune; patent licensed to Novartis from Dana-Farber with royalty paid to Dana-Farber; member, Board of Directors, Blueprint Medicines and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals; member, Scientific Advisory Board with consulting fees and equity, Blueprint Medicines and Merrimack Pharmaceuticals; consultant, Scientific Advisory Board with consulting fees and equity, G1 Therapeutics, Caris Life Sciences, and Champions Oncology; consultant with equity, Bessor Pharmaceuticals.

GH, LD, and QA are employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

J-YB received research support and honoraria from Novartis and GSK.

IJ received honoraria from GSK for giving lectures at industry sponsored symposia.

PH received grants from Novartis; honoraria and consultation fees from GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, AROG, and PharmaMar.

PS received institutional support from providing consulting or an advisory role for 6th Element Capital, Adaptimmune, Amcure, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Ellipses Pharma, Epizyme, Genzyme, Ipsen, Loxo Oncology, Medpace, Merck, Nektar, Piqur Therapeutics, and Plexxikon; received institutional support for speaker’s bureau from Eisai, PharmaMar, and Eli Lilly; received institutional support (research funding) from Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cobiores nv, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exelixis, G1Therapeutics, Novartis, PharmaMar, and Plexxikon; received institutional support for travel, accommodation, and expenses from 6th Element Capital, Adaptimmune, Amcure, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme, Genzyme, GSK, Ipsen, Loxo Oncology, Medpace, Nektar, Novartis, PharmaMar, Philogen, Piqur Therapeutics, and Plexxikon.

MA and HG declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Sonpavde G, Hutson TE. Pazopanib: a novel multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Curr Oncol Rep. 2007;9:115–119. doi: 10.1007/s11912-007-0007-2.
    1. van der Graaf WT, Blay JY, Chawla SP, Kim DW, Bui-Nguyen B, Casali PG, et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1879–1886. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60651-5.
    1. Votrient (pazopanib) [prescribing information] . Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
    1. Votrient [Summary of Product characteristics] . Accessed 6 Sept 2018.
    1. Nijhuis PH, Schaapveld M, Otter R, Molenaar WM, van der Graaf WT, Hoekstra HJ. Epidemiological aspects of soft tissue sarcomas (STS)--consequences for the design of clinical STS trials. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1705–1710. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00152-5.
    1. Biau DJ, Ferguson PC, Turcotte RE, Chung P, Isler MH, Riad S, et al. Adverse effect of older age on the recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and trunk. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4029–4035. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.34.0711.
    1. Hoven-Gondrie ML, Bastiaannet E, Ho VK, van Leeuwen BL, Liefers GJ, Hoekstra HJ, et al. Worse survival in elderly patients with extremity soft-tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2577–2585. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5158-7.
    1. Lev D, Pollock RE. Managing elderly soft tissue sarcoma patients-should age drive treatment? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1725–1726. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1035-y.
    1. Garbay D, Maki RG, Blay JY, Isambert N, Piperno Neumann S, Blay C, et al. Advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in elderly patients: patterns of care and survival. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:1924–1930. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt059.
    1. Hutchins LF, Unger JM, Crowley JJ, Coltman CA, Jr, Albain KS. Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:2061–2067. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199912303412706.
    1. Subbiah V, Hess KR, Khawaja MR, Wagner MJ, Tang C, Naing A, et al. Evaluation of novel targeted therapies in aggressive biology sarcoma patients after progression from US FDA approved therapies. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35448. doi: 10.1038/srep35448.
    1. Cesne AL, Judson I, Maki R, Grosso F, Schuetze S, Mehren MV, et al. Trabectedin is a feasible treatment for soft tissue sarcoma patients regardless of patient age: a retrospective pooled analysis of five phase II trials. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1717–1724. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.524.
    1. Duffaud F, Ray-Coquard I, Marchal F, Chaigneau L, Bouche O, Huynh TK, et al. Clinical experience with sunitinib (SU) in patients over age 65 with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a retrospective study from the French sarcoma group (FSG) J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:10546.
    1. Ray-Coquard I, Collard O, Ducimetiere F, Laramas M, Mercier F, Ladarre N, et al. Treatment patterns and survival in an exhaustive French cohort of pazopanib-eligible patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) BMC Cancer. 2017;17:111. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3057-3.
    1. Grünwald Viktor, Kunitz Annegret, Schuler Markus Kajo, Schoffski Patrick, Kopp Hans-Georg, Bauer Sebastian, Kasper Bernd, Lindner Lars H, Chemnitz Jens-Marcus, Crysandt Martina Margrit, Stein Alexander, Steffen Bjoern, Egerer Gerlinde, Zimmermann Silke, Karch Annika. Randomized comparison of pazopanib (PAZ) and doxorubicin (DOX) in the first line treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in elderly patients (pts): Results of a phase II study (EPAZ) Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2018;36(15_suppl):11506–11506. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.11506.
    1. Bolli N, Avet-Loiseau H, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Alexandrov LB, Martincorena I, et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2014;5:2997. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3997.
    1. Johnson BE, Mazor T, Hong C, Barnes M, Aihara K, McLean CY, et al. Mutational analysis reveals the origin and therapy-driven evolution of recurrent glioma. Science. 2014;343:189–193. doi: 10.1126/science.1239947.
    1. Qazi MA, Vora P, Venugopal C, Sidhu SS, Moffat J, Swanton C, et al. Intratumoral heterogeneity: pathways to treatment resistance and relapse in human glioblastoma. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1448–1456. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx169.
    1. Burrell RA, Swanton C. Tumour heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance. Mol Oncol. 2014;8:1095–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.06.005.
    1. Grassi P, Verzoni E, Ratta R, Porcu L, Prisciandaro M, Mennitto A, et al. Does dose modification affect efficacy of first-line pazopanib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma? Drugs R D. 2017;17:461–467. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0203-y.
    1. Bjarnason GA, Kollmannsberger CK, Ahmad Q, Dezzani L, Elmeliegy M, Han J, et al. Effects of pazopanib (PAZ) and sunitinib (SUN) dose modification on safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) from COMPARZ. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:4574. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.4574.
    1. Shah DR, Shah RR, Morganroth J. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: their on-target toxicities as potential indicators of efficacy. Drug Saf. 2013;36:413–426. doi: 10.1007/s40264-013-0050-x.
    1. Suttle AB, Ball HA, Molimard M, Hutson TE, Carpenter C, Rajagopalan D, et al. Relationships between pazopanib exposure and clinical safety and efficacy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1909–1916. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.503.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit