Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial

Pippa Oakeshott, Sally Kerry, Adamma Aghaizu, Helen Atherton, Sima Hay, David Taylor-Robinson, Ian Simms, Phillip Hay, Pippa Oakeshott, Sally Kerry, Adamma Aghaizu, Helen Atherton, Sima Hay, David Taylor-Robinson, Ian Simms, Phillip Hay

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether screening and treating women for chlamydial infection reduces the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease over the subsequent 12 months.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Common rooms, lecture theatres, and student bars at universities and further education colleges in London.

Participants: 2529 sexually active female students, mean age 21 years (range 16-27).

Intervention: Participants completed a questionnaire and provided self taken vaginal swabs, with follow-up after one year. Samples were randomly allocated to immediate testing and treatment for chlamydial infection, or storage and analysis after a year (deferred screening controls).

Main outcome measure: Incidence of clinical pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months.

Results: Baseline prevalence of chlamydia was 5.4% (68/1254) in screened women and 5.9% (75/1265) in controls. 94% (2377/2529) of women were followed up after 12 months. The incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease was 1.3% (15/1191) in screened women compared with 1.9% (23/1186) in controls (relative risk 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.22). Seven of 74 control women (9.5%, 95% confidence interval 4.7% to 18.3%) who tested positive for chlamydial infection at baseline developed pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months compared with one of 63 (1.6%) screened women (relative risk 0.17, 0.03 to 1.01). However, most episodes of pelvic inflammatory disease occurred in women who tested negative for chlamydia at baseline (79%, 30/38). 22% (527/2377) of women reported being tested independently for chlamydia during the trial.

Conclusion: Although some evidence suggests that screening for chlamydia reduces rates of pelvic inflammatory disease, especially in women with chlamydial infection at baseline, the effectiveness of a single chlamydia test in preventing pelvic inflammatory disease over 12 months may have been overestimated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00115388.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the unified competing interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare (1) no financial support for the submitted work from anyone other than their employer; (2) no financial relationships with commercial entities that might have an interest in the submitted work; (3) no spouses, partners, or children with relationships with commercial entities that might have an interest in the submitted work; and (4) no non-financial interests that may be relevant to the submitted work.

Figures

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4787650/bin/oakp723007.f1_default.jpg
Trial profile

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR 2006;55:56-7.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Chlamydia control in Europe. ECDC, 2009.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Revised rapid review of evidence for the effectiveness of screening for genital chlamydia infection in sexually active young women and men. NICE, 2006.
    1. Scholes D, Stergachis A, Heidrich F, Andrilla H, Holmes K, Stamm W. Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydia infection. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1362-6.
    1. Abter E, Mahmud M. Screening for chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1531.
    1. Sellors J, Paavonen J. Screening to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1531-2.
    1. Pittrof R. Screening for chlamydia to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:1532.
    1. Low N, Bender N, Nartey L, Shang A, Stephenson J. Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review. Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:435-48.
    1. Ostergaard L, Andersen B, Moller JK. Home sampling versus conventional swab sampling for screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in women: a cluster randomised 1-year follow-up study. Clin Infect Dis 2000;31:951-7.
    1. Low N, Egger M, Sterne JAC, Harbord R, Ibrahim F, Lindblom B, et al. Incidence of severe reproductive tract complications associated with diagnosed genital chlamydial infection: the Uppsala Women’s Cohort study. Sex Transm Infect 2006;82:212-8.
    1. Peterman T, Gottlieb S, Berman S. Commentary: Chlamydia trachomatis screening—what are we trying to do? Int J Epidemiol 2009;38:449-51.
    1. Simms I, Horner PJ. Has the incidence of pelvic inflammatory disease following chlamydia infection been overestimated? Int J STD AIDS 2008;18:285.
    1. Oakeshott P, Kerry S, Atherton H, Aghaizu A, Hay S, Taylor-Robinson D, et al. Community-based trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (Prevention of Pelvic Infection) trial. Trials 2008;9:73.
    1. Ivaz S, Dean S, Hay P, Hay S, Kerry S, Oakeshott P. Lessons learned from recruiting young female students to a randomised controlled trial of chlamydia screening. Fam Pract 2006;23:188-91.
    1. Atherton H, Banks D, Hay P, Kerry S, Simms I, Oakeshott P. Recruitment of young women to a trial of chlamydia screening—as easy as it sounds? Trials 2007;8:41.
    1. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of Gram stain interpretation 36. J Clin Microbiol 1991;29:297-301.
    1. Oakeshott P, Hay P, Hay S, Steinke F, Rink E, Kerry S. Association between bacterial vaginosis or chlamydial infection and miscarriage before 16 weeks’ gestation: prospective community based cohort study. BMJ 2002;325:1334-6.
    1. Hager D, Eschenbach D. Criteria for diagnosis and grading of salpingitis. Obstet Gynecol 1983;61:113-4.
    1. Ness RB, Hillier SL, Kip K, Soper D, Stamm CA, McGregor JA, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and risk of pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:761-9.
    1. Miettinen OS, Nurminen M. Comparative analysis of two rates. Stat Med 1985;4:213-26.
    1. Schachter J, Chernesky MA, Willis DE, Fine PM, Martin DH, Fuller D, et al. Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections 1. Sex Transm Dis 2005;32:725-8.
    1. Ness R, Soper D, Holley RL, Peipert J, Randall MD, Sweet R, et al. Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment strategies for women with pelvic inflammatory disease: results from the Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Evaluation and Clinical Health (PEACH) randomised trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:929-37.
    1. Simms I, Rogers P, Charlett A. The rate of diagnosis and demography of pelvic inflammatory disease in general practice: England and Wales. Int J STD AIDS 1999;10:448-51.
    1. Adams EJ, Turner K, Edmunds WJ. The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England. Sex Transm Inf 2007;83:267-75.
    1. Low N, Ward H. Focus on chlamydia. Sex Transm Inf 2007;83:251-2.
    1. Gaydos CA, Wright C, Wood BJ, Waterfield G, Hobson S, Quinn TC. Chlamydia trachomatis reinfection rates among female adolescents seeking rescreening in school-based health centers. Sex Transm Dis 2008;35:233-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit