Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial to evaluate a web-based comprehensive sexual health and media literacy education program for high school students

Tracy M Scull, Christina V Malik, Abigail Morrison, Elyse M Keefe, Tracy M Scull, Christina V Malik, Abigail Morrison, Elyse M Keefe

Abstract

Background: School-based comprehensive sexual health education can improve adolescent health outcomes, and web-based programs are a promising approach to overcoming challenges associated with teacher-led formats by ensuring that students receive content that is consistent, unbiased, and medically accurate. However, many adolescents do not receive high-quality sexual health education and turn to the media for information about sex and relationships. Consumption of sexual media messages is related to early and risky sexual behaviors. Media literacy education (MLE) is a proven approach to adolescent sexual health promotion, yet there are no rigorously evaluated web-based MLE programs to promote sexual and relationship health among high school students.

Methods: This study will test the efficacy, in a randomized controlled trial, of Media Aware, a web-based comprehensive sexual health promotion program for high school students that uses an MLE approach. Participants will be students in 9th and 10th grade health classes in participating schools. Randomization will take place at the school level, and data collection will take place at three time points (i.e., pretest, posttest, and 3 months follow-up). Students in the intervention classrooms will receive Media Aware between pretest and posttest, and students in the delayed-intervention classrooms will receive Media Aware after study completion (i.e., after 3 months follow-up data collection). Students in the delayed-intervention classes will receive their standard health education programming, and teachers in the delayed-intervention classes will be asked to refrain from teaching sexual health or MLE during the study timeframe. The primary outcome variables are intentions, willingness, and behaviors related to sexual health and sexual activity.

Discussion: There are currently no evidence-based comprehensive sexual health programs for high school students that are web-based and use an MLE approach. Media Aware has the potential to be an engaging, less expensive, and effective sexual and relationship health program for high school students. Media Aware is unique in two important ways: (1) the web-based format reduces many of the challenges to fidelity of implementation associated with teacher-led sexual health education; and (2) the MLE approach addresses a commonly ignored influence on adolescent sexual and relationship health, namely, media.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04035694. Registered on 29 July 2019. Contact for Scientific Queries: Tracy Scull, PhD (Principal Investigator); innovation Research & Training at 5316 Highgate Drive, Suite 121, Durham, North Carolina, USA 27713; tscull@irtinc.us.

Keywords: Adolescents; Media literacy education; Randomized controlled trial; Sexual health education; Web-based program.

Conflict of interest statement

The project personnel, including PI Tracy Scull and Co-I Christina Malik, are employees at a small business that has a financial interest in the sale of Media Aware. Their conflict of interest is minimal and is further minimized through careful training of the data collectors and careful supervision of the data collection procedures. The data collected in the proposed studies will be entered into the computer by participants using a web-based data collection system. Furthermore, the data will be analyzed by an independent statistical consultant.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
SPIRIT figure of enrollment, interventions, and assessments
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Seagram’s Lime Twisted Gin advertisement

References

    1. Kirby D, Laris BA. Effective curriculum-based sex and STD/HIV education programs for adolescents. Child Dev Perspect. 2009;3(1):21–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00071.x.
    1. Kirby D, Laris BA, Rolleri LA. Sex and HIV education programs for youth: their impact and important characteristics. Scotts Valley: Family Health International; 2006.
    1. Schalet AT, Santelli JS, Russell ST, Halpern CT, Miller SA, Pickering SS, et al. Invited commentary: broadening the evidence for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and education in the United States. J Youth Adolesc. 2014;43(10):1595–1610. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0178-8.
    1. Hall KS, McDermott Sales J, Komro KA, Santelli J. The state of sex education in the United States. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58(6):595–597. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.032.
    1. Sex and HIV Education: Guttmacher Center for Population Research Innovation and Dissemination; 2019 updated 01-01-2019. . Accessed 24 Jul 2019.
    1. Kann L, Telljohann SK, Hunt H, Hunt P. Health Education: results from the School Health Policies and Practices Study. Washington, DC.: Centers for Disease Control: Division of Adolescent and School Health; 2012.
    1. What are gender roles and stereotypes? : Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc.; 2019. . Accessed 24 Jul 2019.
    1. Shipman C, Kay K. The confidence code for girls. New York: HarperCollins; 2018. pp. 1–9.
    1. Reidy DE, Brookmeyer KA, Gentile B, Berke DS, Zeichner A. Gender role discrepancy stress, high-risk sexual behavior, and sexually transmitted disease. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(2):459–465. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0413-0.
    1. Espelage DL, Merrin GJ, Hatchel T. Peer victimization and dating violence among LGBTQ youth. Youth Violence Juvenile Justice. 2016;16(2):156–173. doi: 10.1177/1541204016680408.
    1. Hayes RM, Abbott RL, Cook S. It's her fault: student acceptance of rape myths on two college campuses. Violence Against Women. 2016;22(13):1540–1555. doi: 10.1177/1077801216630147.
    1. Shapiro S, Brown C. Sex education standards across the states. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress; 2018.
    1. Wantedness of sexual intercourse: CDC/National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. . Accessed 24 Jul 2019.
    1. PPFA . Consent survey results summary. New York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc.; 2016.
    1. Smith SG, Zhang X, Basile KC, Merrick MT, Wang J, Kresnow M, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2015 data brief - updated release. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018.
    1. Kann L, McManus T, Harris WA, Shanklin SL, Flint KH, Queen B, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2017. Surveillance Summ. 2018;67(8):1–114. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1.
    1. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ, McCree DH, Harrington K, Davies SL. Dating violence and the sexual health of black adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):E72. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.5.e72.
    1. Healthy Sexuality Education as Child Sexual Abuse Prevention. Enola: Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape; 2016.
    1. Crawford-Jakubiak JE, Alderman EM, Leventhal JM, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, AAA Committee on Adolescence Care of the adolescent after an acute sexual assault. Pediatrics. 2017;139(3):e20164243. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4243.
    1. Leonardi M, Frecker H, Scheim AI, Kives S. Reproductive health considerations in sexual and/or gender minority adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019;32(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2018.09.010.
    1. Rideout V. The Common Sense census: media use by tweens and teens. San Francisco: Common Sense Media, Inc.; 2015.
    1. Ward LM, Erickson SE, Lippman J, Giaccardi S. Sexual media content and effects. In: Nussbaum JF, editor. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.
    1. Ward LM. Media and sexualization: state of empirical research, 1995–2015. J Sex Res. 2016;53(4/5):560–577. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1142496.
    1. Brown JD, Bobkowski PS. Older and newer media: patterns of use and effects on adolescents' health and well-being. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21(1):95–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00717.x.
    1. Brown JD, Halpern CT, L'Engle KL. Mass media as a sexual super peer for early maturing girls. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36(5):420–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.06.003.
    1. Brown JD, L'Engle KL. X-Rated: sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents' exposure to sexually explicit media. Commun Res. 2009;36(1):129–151. doi: 10.1177/0093650208326465.
    1. Ybarra ML, Strasburger VC, Mitchell KJ. Sexual media exposure, sexual behavior, and sexual violence victimization in adolescence. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2014;53(13):1239–1247. doi: 10.1177/0009922814538700.
    1. Brown JD, L'Engle KL, Pardun CJ, Guo G, Kenneavy K, Jackson C. Sexy media matter: exposure to sexual content in music, movies, television, and magazines predicts black and white adolescent sexual behavior. Pediatrics. 2006;117(4):1018–1027. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1406.
    1. Jeong SH, Cho H, Hwang Y. Media literacy interventions: a meta-analytic review. J Commun. 2012;62(3):454–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x.
    1. Vahedi Z, Sibalis A, Sutherland JE. Are media literacy interventions effective at changing attitudes and intentions towards risky health behaviors in adolescents? A meta-analytic review. J Adolesc. 2018;67:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.06.007.
    1. Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Chen YC, Cohen M. The role of media literacy in shaping adolescents' understanding of and responses to sexual portrayals in mass media. J Health Commun. 2012;17(4):460–476. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.635770.
    1. Scull TM, Malik CV, Kupersmidt JB. A media literacy education approach to teaching adolescents comprehensive sexual health education. J Media Literacy Educ. 2014;6(1):1–14.
    1. Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Cohen M, Chen YC, Fitzgerald E. Effects of a peer-led media literacy curriculum on adolescents' knowledge and attitudes toward sexual behavior and media portrayals of sex. Health Commun. 2008;23(5):462–472. doi: 10.1080/10410230802342135.
    1. Scull TM, Kupersmidt JB, Malik CV, Keefe EM. Examining the efficacy of an mHealth media literacy education program for sexual health promotion in older adolescents attending community college. J Am Coll Heal. 2018;66(3):165–177. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2017.1393822.
    1. Pinkleton BE, Austin EW, Chen Y-CY, Cohen M. Assessing effects of a media literacy-based intervention on US adolescents' responses to and interpretations of sexual media messages. J Child Media. 2013;7(4):463–479. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2013.781512.
    1. Cohen J. The effect size index: d. In: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Raudenbush SW, Spybrook J, Bloom H, Congdon R, Hill C, Martinez A. Optimal design software for multi-level and longitudinal research (Version 3.01) [Software] 2011.
    1. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Blanton H, Russell DW. Reasoned action and social reaction: willingness and intention as independent predictors of health risk. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1164–1180. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1164.
    1. L'Engle KL, Brown JD, Kenneavy K. The mass media are an important context for adolescents' sexual behavior. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(3):186–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.03.020.
    1. Jemmott LS, Jemmott JB. Applying the theory of reasoned action to AIDS risk behavior: condom use among black women. Nurs Res. 1991;40:228–234. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199107000-00008.
    1. Kupersmidt JB, Scull TM, Benson JW. Improving media message interpretation processing skills to promote healthy decision making about substance use: the effects of the middle school media ready curriculum. J Health Commun. 2012;17(5):546–563. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2011.635769.
    1. Scull T, Malik C, Keefe EM, Schoemann A. Evaluating the short-term Impact of Media Aware Parent, a web-based program for parents with the goal of adolescent sexual health promotion. J Youth Adolesc. 2019;28(9):1686–1706. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01077-0.
    1. Austin EW, Johnson KK. Effects of general and alcohol-specific media literacy training on children's decision making about alcohol. J Health Commun. 1997;2(1):17–42. doi: 10.1080/108107397127897.
    1. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Ennett ST, Suchindran C, Benefield T, Linder GF. Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program "Safe Dates" using random coefficient regression modeling. Prev Sci. 2005;6(3):245–258. doi: 10.1007/s11121-005-0007-0.
    1. Payne DL, Lonsway KA, Fitzgerald LF. Rape myth acceptance: exploration of its structure and its measurement using the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale. J Res Pers. 1999;33:27–68. doi: 10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238.
    1. McMahon S, Farmer L. An updated measure for assessing subtle rape myths. Natl Assoc Soc Workers. 2011;35(2):71–81.
    1. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Rape prevention through bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2005.
    1. Soet JE, Dudley WN, Dilorio C. The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women's sexual behavior. Psychol Women Q. 1999;23:707–723. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00393.x.
    1. Shiv B, Britton JAE, Payne JW. Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages? J Consum Res. 2004;31(1):199–208. doi: 10.1086/383435.
    1. Moyer-Gusé E, Nabi RL. Explaining the effects of narrative in an entertainment television program: overcoming resistance to persuasion. Hum Commun Res. 2010;36(1):26–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01367.x.
    1. MacKenzie SB, Lutz RJ, Belch GE. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: a test of competing explanations. J Mark Res. 1986;23(2):130–143. doi: 10.1177/002224378602300205.
    1. Myklestad I, Rise J. Predicting willingness to engage in unsafe sex and intention to perform sexual protective behaviors among adolescents. Health Educ Behav. 2007;34(4):686–699. doi: 10.1177/1090198106289571.
    1. Schafer JL. The analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall; 1997.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit