A novel approach to glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, partial jejunal diversion: pre-clinical to clinical pathway

Martin Fried, Karin Dolezalova, Adam P Chambers, Elliott J Fegelman, Robin Scamuffa, Michael L Schwiers, Jason R Waggoner, Martin Haluzik, Randy J Seeley, Martin Fried, Karin Dolezalova, Adam P Chambers, Elliott J Fegelman, Robin Scamuffa, Michael L Schwiers, Jason R Waggoner, Martin Haluzik, Randy J Seeley

Abstract

Objective: To explore partial jejunal diversion (PJD) via a side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy for improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). PJD is an anatomy-sparing, technically simple surgery in comparison to the predominate metabolic procedures, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Positive results in a rodent model prompted a human proof-of-concept study.

Research design and methods: Pre-clinically, 71 rats were studied in a model of metabolic dysfunction induced by a high-fat diet; 33 animals undergoing one of two lengths of PJD were compared with 18 undergoing sham, 10 RYGB and 10 jejuno-ileal bypass. Clinically, 15 adult subjects with treated but inadequately controlled T2DM (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 8.0%-11.0%), body mass index of 27.0-40.0 kg/m2, and C peptide ≥3 ng/mL were studied. Follow-up was at 2 weeks, and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-PJD.

Results: Pre-clinically, positive impacts with PJD on glucose homeostasis, cholesterol, and body composition versus sham control were demonstrated. Clinically, PJD was performed successfully without serious complications. Twelve months post-surgery, the mean (SD) reduction from baseline in HbA1c was 2.3% (1.3) (p<0.01).

Conclusions: PJD may provide an anatomy sparing, low-risk, intervention for poorly controlled T2DM without significant alteration of the patient's lifestyle. The proof-of-concept study is limited by a small sample size and advanced disease, with 80% of participants on insulin and a mean time since diagnosis of over 10 years. Further study is warranted.

Trial registration number: NCT02283632; Pre-results.

Keywords: Metabolic; Surgery; Type 2 Diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MF, KD, APC, and MH have nothing to declare. RJS currently receives funding from Ethicon, Inc. EJF, RS, MLS, and JRW are employed by Ethicon, Inc.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Body weight and oral glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese rats at 5 weeks post-surgery. Diet-induced obese rats underwent a sham (n=10) operation, 30 cm partial jejunal diversion (PJD) (n=8), 42 cm PJD (n=10), jejuno-ileal bypass (JIB) (n=10), or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (n=9) surgery. (A) Body weight (g); (B) blood glucose in response to a 2-hour mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT, n=7–11 per group); (C) plasma GLP-1 (pg/mL, 8–10 per group); (D) plasma insulin (ng/mL, n=8–10); (E) 4-week lean mass (g, n=8–10 per group); F) 4-week fat mass (g, n=8–10 per group); (G) liver triglycerides (mg/dL). All data presented as mean±SE. Data were analyzed via one-way independent measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) or two-way ANOVA with time as a repeated measure, followed by Bonferroni multiple comparisons test where appropriate. *p

Figure 2

Key clinical efficacy outcomes for…

Figure 2

Key clinical efficacy outcomes for (A) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), (B) weight change. Data…

Figure 2
Key clinical efficacy outcomes for (A) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), (B) weight change. Data points are mean change from baseline absolute HbA1c (A) or mean change from baseline absolute body weight (B) and error bars represent SEM for n=15 patients. Data below the charts are absolute mean and median HbA1c (A) or mean and median % body weight reduction (*p
Similar articles
Cited by
References
    1. Global Report on Diabetes. World Health Organization; http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204871/1/9789241565257_eng.pdf?... (accessed Mar 2017).
    1. Global Health Estimates 2015. Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2015. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalCOD_method_200...(accessed Mar 2017).
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes–3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2002–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401329 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. . Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for Type 2 diabetes: A joint statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Diabetes Care 2016;39:861–77. - PubMed
    1. Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, et al. . The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2271–9. 10.2337/dc12-2258 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Show all 22 references
Associated data
Related information
Full text links [x]
[x]
Cite
Copy Download .nbib
Format: AMA APA MLA NLM
Figure 2
Figure 2
Key clinical efficacy outcomes for (A) hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), (B) weight change. Data points are mean change from baseline absolute HbA1c (A) or mean change from baseline absolute body weight (B) and error bars represent SEM for n=15 patients. Data below the charts are absolute mean and median HbA1c (A) or mean and median % body weight reduction (*p

References

    1. Global Report on Diabetes. World Health Organization; (accessed Mar 2017).
    1. Global Health Estimates 2015. Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2015. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. (accessed Mar 2017).
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes–3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2002–13. 10.1056/NEJMoa1401329
    1. Rubino F, Nathan DM, Eckel RH, et al. . Delegates of the 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit. Metabolic surgery in the treatment algorithm for Type 2 diabetes: A joint statement by International Diabetes Organizations. Diabetes Care 2016;39:861–77.
    1. Stark Casagrande S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, et al. . The prevalence of meeting A1C, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2271–9. 10.2337/dc12-2258
    1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. . Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-Year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2017;376:641–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1600869
    1. Rubino F, Schauer PR, Kaplan LM, et al. . Metabolic surgery to treat type 2 diabetes: clinical outcomes and mechanisms of action. Annu Rev Med 2010;61:393–411. 10.1146/annurev.med.051308.105148
    1. Singh D, Laya AS, Clarkston WK, et al. . Jejunoileal bypass: a surgery of the past and a review of its complications. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:2277–9. 10.3748/wjg.15.2277
    1. Baker MT. The history and evolution of bariatric surgical procedures. Surg Clin North Am 2011;91:1181–201. 10.1016/j.suc.2011.08.002
    1. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. . Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2013;9:731–5. 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.018
    1. Melissas J, Peppe A, Askoxilakis J, et al. . Sleeve gastrectomy plus side-to-side jejunoileal anastomosis for the treatment of morbid obesity and metabolic diseases: a promising operation. Obes Surg 2012;22:1104–9. 10.1007/s11695-012-0637-9
    1. Woods SC, Seeley RJ, Rushing PA, et al. . A controlled high-fat diet induces an obese syndrome in rats. J Nutr 2003;133:1081–7.
    1. Jandacek RJ, Heubi JE, Tso P. A novel, noninvasive method for the measurement of intestinal fat absorption. Gastroenterology 2004;127:139–44. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.04.007
    1. Chambers AP, Jessen L, Ryan KK, et al. . Weight-independent changes in blood glucose homeostasis after gastric bypass or vertical sleeve gastrectomy in rats. Gastroenterology 2011;141:950–8. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.05.050
    1. Matsuda M, DeFronzo RA. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1462–70. 10.2337/diacare.22.9.1462
    1. Herzberg-Schäfer SA, Staiger H, Heni M, et al. . Evaluation of fasting state-/oral glucose tolerance test-derived measures of insulin release for the detection of genetically impaired β-cell function. PLoS One 2010;5:e14194 10.1371/journal.pone.0014194
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
    1. Stemmer K, Bielohuby M, Grayson BE, et al. . Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery but not vertical sleeve gastrectomy decreases bone mass in male rats. Endocrinology 2013;154:2015–24. 10.1210/en.2012-2130
    1. Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, et al. . How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery? Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:198–201. 10.1111/dom.12405
    1. Gummesson A, Nyman E, Knutsson M, et al. . Effect of weight reduction on glycated haemoglobin in weight loss trials in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2017:1–11. 10.1111/dom.12971
    1. Melissas J, ErenTaskin H, Peirasmakis D, et al. . A Simple food-diverting operation for Type 2 diabetes treatment. Preliminary results in humans with BMI 28-32 kg/m(2). Obes Surg 2017;27:22–9. 10.1007/s11695-016-2251-8
    1. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, et al. . Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2011;28:628–42. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03306.x

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit