Comprehensive public health evaluation of lockdown as a non-pharmaceutical intervention on COVID-19 spread in India: national trends masking state-level variations

Maxwell Salvatore, Deepankar Basu, Debashree Ray, Mike Kleinsasser, Soumik Purkayastha, Rupam Bhattacharyya, Bhramar Mukherjee, Maxwell Salvatore, Deepankar Basu, Debashree Ray, Mike Kleinsasser, Soumik Purkayastha, Rupam Bhattacharyya, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of four-phase national lockdown from March 25 to May 31 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in India and unmask the state-wise variations in terms of multiple public health metrics.

Design: Cohort study (daily time series of case counts).

Setting: Observational and population based.

Participants: Confirmed COVID-19 cases nationally and across 20 states that accounted for >99% of the current cumulative case counts in India until 31 May 2020.

Exposure: Lockdown (non-medical intervention).

Main outcomes and measures: We illustrate the masking of state-level trends and highlight the variations across states by presenting evaluative evidence on some aspects of the COVID-19 outbreak: case fatality rates, doubling times of cases, effective reproduction numbers and the scale of testing.

Results: The estimated effective reproduction number R for India was 3.36 (95% CI 3.03 to 3.71) on 24 March, whereas the average of estimates from 25 May to 31 May stands at 1.27 (95% CI 1.26 to 1.28). Similarly, the estimated doubling time across India was at 3.56 days on 24 March, and the past 7-day average for the same on 31 May is 14.37 days. The average daily number of tests increased from 1717 (19-25 March) to 113 372 (25-31 May) while the test positivity rate increased from 2.1% to 4.2%, respectively. However, various states exhibit substantial departures from these national patterns.

Conclusions: Patterns of change over lockdown periods indicate the lockdown has been partly effective in slowing the spread of the virus nationally. However, there exist large state-level variations and identifying these variations can help in both understanding the dynamics of the pandemic and formulating effective public health interventions. Our framework offers a holistic assessment of the pandemic across Indian states and union territories along with a set of interactive visualisation tools that are daily updated at covind19.org.

Keywords: epidemiology; public health; statistics & research methods.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Daily number of reported cases, fatalities and recovered cases in India (panel A) over the period between 15 March and 31 May with four states to capture the variation. Kerala (panel B) was doing well initially but has seen a recent surge of cases. Punjab (panel C) is an example state of ‘doing well’ whereas case counts in Maharashtra (panel D) and Delhi (panel E) are still increasing.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot dashboard. (A) Forest plot of estimated case fatality rates (CFR1) based on all confirmed cases as of 31 May, along with 95% CIs, for 20 states and union territories of India, and a national summary.(B) Forest plot of estimated doubling times (in days) based on data from a 7-day past window from 31 May, along with 95% CIs, for 20 states and union territories of India, and a national summary. (C) Forest plot of estimated time-varying R (effective basic reproduction number) based on data from a 7-day past window from 31 May, along with 95% CIs, for 20 states and union territories of India, and a national summary. (D) Forest plot of test positivity rates (proportion scale) based on data as of 31 May, for 20 states and union territories of India, along with a national summary.
Figure 3
Figure 3
National estimates of doubling times and time-varying R. (A) Estimated doubling times of total number of COVID-19 cases in India, with averages for the prelockdown and postlockdown periods and past 7-day average as of 31 May. (B) Estimated time-varying R (effective basic reproduction number) for COVID-19 in India with averages for the prelockdown and postlockdown periods and past 7-day average as of 31 May, along with 95% CIs.
Figure 4
Figure 4
State-wise estimates of doubling times and time-varying R. (A) Estimated doubling times of total number of COVID-19 cases in 20 Indian states and union territories. (B) Estimated time-varying R (effective basic reproduction number) for COVID-19 in 20 Indian states and union territories along with 95% CIs.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Time series plot of test positivity rates for India over the period between 1 April and 31 May.

References

    1. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID- 19)—Symptoms and causes. Mayo Clinic, 2020. Available:
    1. Hui DS, I Azhar E, Madani TA, et al. . The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health - The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int J Infect Dis 2020;91:264–6. 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.009
    1. Chauhan N. After Covid-19 lockdown, plan to unlock India in phases, 2020.
    1. Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs . D.O. No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A); 2020.
    1. COVID-19 India COVID-19 Tracker updates for India for State-wise and District-wise data, 2020. Available:
    1. Indian Council of Medical Research Advisory on strategy for COVID-19 testing in India, 2020. Available:
    1. Jewell NP, Lewnard JA, Jewell BL. Predictive mathematical models of the COVID-19 pandemic: underlying principles and value of projections. JAMA 2020;323:1893. 10.1001/jama.2020.6585
    1. Ray D, Salvatore M, Bhattacharyya R, et al. . Predictions, role of interventions and effects of a historic national lockdown in India's response to the COVID-19 pandemic: data science call to arms. Harv Data Sci Rev 2020;2020. 10.1162/99608f92.60e08ed5. [Epub ahead of print: 09 Jun 2020].
    1. Mitra A, Pakhare AP, Roy A, et al. . Impact of COVID-19 epidemic curtailment strategies in selected Indian states: an analysis by reproduction number and doubling time with incidence modelling. Medrxiv. 10.1101/2020.05.10.20094946
    1. Ghosh P, Ghosh R, Chakraborty B. COVID-19 in India: Statewise analysis and prediction. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6:e20341. 10.2196/20341
    1. Jakhar M, Ahluwalia PK, Kumar A. COVID-19 epidemic forecast in different states of India using Sir model. Medrxiv. 10.1101/2020.05.14.20101725
    1. Gupta M. Transmission dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in India and modelling optimal lockdown exit strategies. Medrxiv. 10.1101/2020.05.13.20096826
    1. Lathika Rajendrakumar A. Epidemic landscape and forecasting of SARS-CoV-2 in India. Medrxiv. 10.1101/2020.04.14.20065151
    1. Government of India Press information bureau VG/SNC/VM, 2020. Available:
    1. Government of India,, Ministry of Home Affairs . D.O. No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A), 2020. Available:
    1. Government of India,, Ministry of Home Affairs . D.O. No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A), 2020. Available:
    1. Government of India,, Ministry of Home Affairs . D.O. No. 40-3/2020-DM-I(A), 2020. Available:
    1. Roser M, Ritchie H, Ortiz-Ospina E, et al. . Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data, 2020. Available:
    1. COV-IND-19 Study Group COVID-19 outbreak in India, 2020. Available:
    1. Ghani AC, Donnelly CA, Cox DR, et al. . Methods for estimating the case fatality ratio for a novel, emerging infectious disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162:479–86. 10.1093/aje/kwi230
    1. Cori A, Ferguson NM, Fraser C, et al. . A new framework and software to estimate time-varying reproduction numbers during epidemics. Am J Epidemiol 2013;178:1505–12. 10.1093/aje/kwt133
    1. Pan A, Liu L, Wang C, et al. . Association of public health interventions with the epidemiology of the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020;323:1915. 10.1001/jama.2020.6130
    1. Wu JT, Leung K, Bushman M, et al. . Estimating clinical severity of COVID-19 from the transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China. Nat Med 2020;26:506–10. 10.1038/s41591-020-0822-7
    1. Johns Hopkins University Which U.S. states meet who recommended testing criteria? Coronavrus resource center, 2020. Available:
    1. Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 Dashboard by the center for systems science and engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU), 2020. Available:
    1. COV-IND-19 Study Group Unlocking the 40-day national lockdown in India: there is no magic key. Medium 2020.
    1. Belfin R, Brodka P, Radhakrishnan B, et al. . COVID-19 peak estimation and effect of nationwide lockdown in India. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.05.09.20095919
    1. Paul A, Chatterjee S, Bairagi N. Prediction on Covid-19 epidemic for different countries: focusing on South Asia under various precautionary measures. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.04.08.20055095
    1. Wang L, et al. An epidemiological forecast model and software assessing interventions on COVID-19 epidemic in China. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.02.29.20029421
    1. Government of India Chapter 12. in economic survey 2016-17. Ministry of Finance, Government of India, 2017.
    1. Maji A, Choudhari T, Sushma MB. Implication of repatriating migrant workers on COVID-19 spread and transportation requirements. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 2020;7:100187 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100187
    1. Kumar A. Modeling geographical spread of COVID-19 in India using network-based approach. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.04.23.20076489
    1. Pujari BS, Shekatkar SM. Multi-city modeling of epidemics using spatial networks: application to 2019-nCov (COVID-19) coronavirus in India. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.03.13.20035386
    1. Gupta S, et al. An India-specific compartmental model for Covid-19: projections and intervention strategies by incorporating geographical, Infrastructural and response heterogeneity. arXiv 2020.
    1. Gupta AK, Sharma N, Verma AK. Spatial network based model forecasting transmission and control of COVID-19. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.05.06.20092858
    1. Cash R, Patel V. Has COVID-19 subverted global health? Lancet 2020;395:1687–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31089-8
    1. Stein R, Wroth C, Hurt AUS. Coronavirus Testing Still Falls Short. How’s Your State Doing? 2020.
    1. Hao X, Cheng S, Wu D, et al. . Reconstruction of the full transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in Wuhan. Nature 2020;584:420–4. 10.1038/s41586-020-2554-8
    1. Bhattacharyya R, Bhaduri R, Kundu R, et al. . Reconciling epidemiological models with misclassified case-counts for SARS-CoV-2 with seroprevalence surveys: a case study in Delhi, India. Medrxiv 2020. 10.1101/2020.07.31.20166249
    1. Saxena A. Explained: Here are the key takeaways from Delhi’s serological survey. The Indian Express, 2020.
    1. Rahmandad H, Lim TY, Sterman J. Estimating COVID-19 under-reporting across 86 nations: implications for projections and control. SSRN 2020.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit