Case-Based Curriculum With Integrated Smartphone Applications Improves Internal Medicine Resident Knowledge Of Contraceptive Care

Alexandra Bachorik, Michelle K Nemer, Grace L Chen, Cristina Baseggio Alexander, Stephen R Pelletier, Lydia E Pace, Helen M Shields, Alexandra Bachorik, Michelle K Nemer, Grace L Chen, Cristina Baseggio Alexander, Stephen R Pelletier, Lydia E Pace, Helen M Shields

Abstract

Background: Contraception is an essential preventive service for all women. However, the literature suggests that internal medicine residents have low levels of confidence and knowledge of contraceptive care.

Objective: We designed and implemented a novel contraception curriculum promoting active, collaborative learning. We sought to evaluate whether this curriculum improved internal medicine resident knowledge of and comfort with contraceptive care through the administration of pre-/post-surveys.

Methods: Our curriculum was delivered in a two-hour session as part of the mandatory ambulatory curriculum for internal medicine interns at our institution in the academic year 2017-2018. Interns were provided with select online resources and two smartphone applications at the beginning of the session, which they then used in case-based small group work. Small group work was followed by a large group case review, co-facilitated by OB/GYN and internal medicine faculty.

Results: Thirty-eight participants completed surveys assessing knowledge of and comfort with contraceptive care immediately before and after the curriculum; 20 participants completed surveys assessing the same domains 4-6 months after the curriculum. Data from surveys administered immediately post-curriculum demonstrated significant improvements in knowledge about and comfort with counseling about, assessing medical eligibility for, and initiating multiple forms of contraception. Many of these improvements in knowledge and comfort were maintained on follow-up surveys 4-6 months following the curriculum.

Conclusion: Our case-based curriculum with integrated smartphone applications resulted in significant improvements in internal medicine resident knowledge of and comfort with the key skills of contraceptive care. In contrast to active, collaborative learning methodologies such as the flipped classroom, our methodology supports active, collaborative learning without requiring advance learner preparation, and is thus well suited to the time constraints of the graduate medical education setting. Our methodology is readily translatable to other clinical topics and residency curricula.

Keywords: active learning; contraception; medical education-curriculum development/evaluation; medical education-graduate; reproductive health.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no competing financial interests exist. We presented a poster covering this innovation and its results at the Harvard Medical School Medical Education Day on December 11, 2018.

© 2019 Bachorik et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Resident performance on knowledge assessment before and after curriculum participation. Notes: Study participants completed a knowledge assessment, composed of 10 boards-style questions with clinical vignettes, immediately before, immediately after and 4–6 months after participation in the curriculum. P values to assess the statistical significance of changes between pre- and immediate post-survey data were calculated using a paired t-test; p values to assess the statistical significance of changes between pre- and delayed post-survey were calculated using an independent t-test.

References

    1. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(9):843–852. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
    1. Campbell KH, Savitz D, Werner EF, et al. Maternal morbidity and risk of death at delivery hospitalization. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):627. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a06f4e
    1. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Syverson C, Seed K, Bruce FC, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2006–2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):5. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000564
    1. Edwards ST, Mafi JN, Landon BE. Trends and quality of care in outpatient visits to generalist and specialist physicians delivering primary care in the United States, 1997–2010. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(6):947–955. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2808-y
    1. Schreiber CA, Harwood BJ, Switzer GE, Creinin MD, Reeves MF, Ness RB. Training and attitudes about contraceptive management across primary care specialties: a survey of graduating residents. Contraception. 2006;73(6):618–622. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.01.014
    1. Dirksen RR, Shulman B, Teal SB, Huebschmann AG. Contraceptive counseling by general internal medicine faculty and residents. J Womens Health. 2014;23(8):707–713. doi:10.1089/jwh.2013.4567
    1. Spencer AL, Kern LM. Primary care program directors’ perceptions of women’s health education: a gap in graduate medical education persists. J Womens Health. 2008;17(4):549–556. doi:10.1089/jwh.2007.0473
    1. Internal Medicine Training in Ambulatory Gynecology | JAMA Internal Medicine | The JAMA Network. Available from: Accessed February8, 2018.
    1. Casas RS, Hallett LD, Rich CA, Gerber MR, Battaglia TA. Program directors’ perceptions of resident education in women’s health: a national survey. J Womens Health. 2016;26(2):133–140. doi:10.1089/jwh.2016.5860
    1. Graham KL, Cohen A, Reynolds EE, Huang GC. Effect of a flipped classroom on knowledge acquisition and retention in an internal medicine residency program. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(1):92–97. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00536.1
    1. King AM, Gottlieb M, Mitzman J, Dulani T, Schulte SJ, Way DP. Flipping the classroom in graduate medical education: a systematic review. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11(1):18–29. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-18-00350.2
    1. Schwartzstein RM, Roberts DH. Saying goodbye to lectures in medical school — paradigm shift or passing fad? N Engl J Med. 2017;377(7):605–607. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1706474
    1. Franko OI, Tirrell TF. Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs. J Med Syst. 2012;36(5):3135–3139. doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9798-7
    1. Short SS, Lin AC, Merianos DJ, Burke RV, Upperman JS. Smartphones, trainees, and mobile education: implications for graduate medical education. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(2):199–202. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-13-00238.1
    1. Boruff JT, Storie D. Mobile devices in medicine: a survey of how medical students, residents, and faculty use smartphones and other mobile devices to find information. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014;102(1):22–30. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.102.1.006
    1. Contraception Point-of-Care on the App Store. App Store. Available from: Accessed May28, 2018.
    1. Contraception on the App Store. App Store. Available from: Accessed May28, 2018.
    1. Contraception options - the reproductive health access project. Reproductive Health Access Project. Available from: Accessed May28, 2018.
    1. CDC - summary - USMEC - reproductive health. Available from: Published September 28, 2017. Accessed May28, 2018.
    1. Thomas PA. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach. JHU Press; 2015.
    1. Paniagua MA, Swygert KA. Constructing Written Test Questions for The Basic and Clinical Sciences. Philadephia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners; 2016.
    1. Tam V, You JJ, Bernacki R. Enhancing medical learners’ knowledge of, comfort and confidence in holding serious illness conversations. Am J Hosp Palliat Med. 2019;36(12):1096–1104. doi:10.1177/1049909119857988
    1. Mody SK, Kiley J, Gawron L, Garcia P, Hammond C. Team-based learning: a novel approach to medical student education in family planning. Contraception. 2013;88(2):239–242. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.012
    1. Ottolenghi J, Athauda G, Stumbar SE, Kashan SB, Lupi C. Contraceptive pharmacology and risk communication: a case-based flipped classroom exercise. MedEdPORTAL J Teach Learn Resour. 2019;15:10790. doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10790
    1. Daniel H, Erickson SM, Bornstein SS; for the Health and Public Policy Committee of the American College of Physicians. Women’s Health Policy in the United States: an American College of physicians position paper. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(12):874. doi:10.7326/M17-3344
    1. Wolfley L Active learning strategies | center for excellence in teaching and learning. September 2014. Available from: Accessed September13, 2019.
    1. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93(3):223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
    1. Inra JA, Pelletier S, Kumar NL, Barnes EL, Shields HM. An active learning curriculum improves fellows’ knowledge and faculty teaching skills. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;8:359–364. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S135538
    1. Hurtubise L, Hall E, Sheridan L, Han H. The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2015;2:JMECD.S23895. doi:10.4137/JMECD.S23895
    1. Englander R, Cameron T, Ballard AJ, Dodge J, Bull J, Aschenbrener CA. Toward a common taxonomy of competency domains for the health professions and competencies for physicians. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1088–1094. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a3b2b
    1. Tolks D, Schäfer C, Raupach T, et al. An introduction to the inverted/flipped classroom model in education and advanced training in medicine and in the healthcare professions. GMS J Med Educ. 2016;33(3). doi:10.3205/zma001045
    1. Young TP, Bailey CJ, Guptill M, Thorp AW, Thomas TL. The flipped classroom: a modality for mixed asynchronous and synchronous learning in a residency program. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):938–944. doi:10.5811/westjem.2014.10.23515
    1. Merriam SB, Bierema LL. Adult Learning: Linking Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
    1. Kerfoot BP, DeWolf WC, Masser BA, Church PA, Federman DD. Spaced education improves the retention of clinical knowledge by medical students: a randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):23–31. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02644.x
    1. Wallace S, Clark M, White J. ‘It’s on my iPhone’: attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4):e001099. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit