Olfactive stimulation interventions for managing procedural pain in preterm and full-term neonates: a systematic review protocol

Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugère, Andréane Lavallée, Marilyn Aita, Gwenaëlle De Clifford-Faugère, Andréane Lavallée, Marilyn Aita

Abstract

Background: While hospitalized in the NICU, preterm neonates undergo many painful procedures. This may be the same for full-term neonates when longer hospitalization is required. Untreated and repeated pain has short-term as well as long-term consequences for these neonates. Pharmacological pain management methods have many limitations in their applications for both preterm and full-term neonates. A combination of different non-pharmacological methods is recommended for pain management. The effect of olfactive stimulation as a non-pharmacological pain management method was investigated by a few studies in the past years with premature and term neonates, but no systematic review has been conducted. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effect of olfactive stimulation intervention on the pain response of preterm and full-term neonates during painful procedures.

Methods: An electronic search will be conducted in various databases such as PubMed (1946 to date), MEDLINE (1946 to date), CINAHL (1981 to date), Embase (1947 to date), PsycINFO (1806 to date), Web of Science (1945 to date), CENTRAL and Scopus (1960 to date), and Proquest, without restriction for the year of publication. Only studies published in English or French will be included. The search will be conducted using the following three concepts: pain, odors, and neonates. Selection of articles, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias will be conducted by two independent researchers. A third researcher will intervene in case of disagreement. According to the availability of studies and data homogeneity, the results will be combined to perform a meta-analysis, or they will be described by a narrative synthesis.

Discussion: This systematic review will provide light on the current state of knowledge on the effectiveness of olfactive stimulation interventions for managing pain in preterm and full-term neonates. This review will guide clinical practice as well as research to improve preterm and full-term neonates' pain management and prevent short-term and long-term complications caused by pain.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42017058021.

Keywords: Full-term neonate; Non-pharmacological intervention; Odors; Pain; Preterm; Systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Anand KJ, Hickey PR. Pain and its effects in the human neonate and fetus. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(21):1321. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198711193172105.
    1. Institut canadien d’Information sur la Santé (ICIS) Nés trop vite et trop petits : étude sur les bébés de faible poids au Canada. 2009.
    1. Cruz MD, Fernandes AM, Oliveira CR. Epidemiology of painful procedures performed in neonates: a systematic review of observational studies. Eur J Pain (London, England) 2016;20(4):489–498. doi: 10.1002/ejp.757.
    1. Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A. Premature Infant Pain Profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain. 1996;12(1):13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199603000-00004.
    1. Johnston C, Barrington KJ, Taddio A, Carbajal R, Filion F. Pain in Canadian NICUs: have we improved over the past 12 years? Clin J Pain. 2011;27(3):225–232. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181fe14cf.
    1. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008;300(1):60–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60.
    1. Ludington-Hoe SM, Cong X, Hashemi F. Infant crying: nature, physiologic consequences, and select interventions. Neonatal Netw. 2002;21(2):29. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.21.2.29.
    1. Valeri BO, Ranger M, Chau CM, Cepeda IL, Synnes A, Linhares MB, et al. Neonatal Invasive Procedures Predict Pain Intensity at School Age in Children Born Very Preterm. Clin J Pain. 2016;32(12):1086–93.
    1. Hermann C, Hohmeister J, Demirakça S, Zohsel K, Flor H. Long-term alteration of pain sensitivity in school-aged children with early pain experiences. Pain. 2006;125(3):278–285. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.08.026.
    1. Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Petrie-Thomas J, Synnes AR, Cepeda IL, Keidar A, et al. Neonatal pain, parenting stress and interaction, in relation to cognitive and motor development at 8 and 18 months in preterm infants. Pain. 2009;143(1–2):138–146. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.02.014.
    1. Pillai Riddell RR, Racine NM, Gennis HG, Turcotte K, Uman LS, Horton RE, Ahola Kohut S, Hillgrove Stuart J, Stevens B, Lisi DM. Non-pharmacological management of infant and young child procedural pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006275.pub3.
    1. American Academy of Pediatrics Prevention and management of pain in the neonate: an update. Adv Neonatal Care. 2007;7(3):151–160. doi: 10.1097/01.ANC.0000278214.49133.7d.
    1. Stevens B, Yamada J, Ohlsson A, Haliburton S, Shorkey A. Sucrose for analgesia in newborn infants undergoing painful procedures. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev. 2016;7:CD001069.
    1. Shah PS, Herbozo C, Aliwalas LL, Shah VS. Breastfeeding or breast milk for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev. 2012;12:CD004950.
    1. Johnston C, Campbell-Yeo M, Disher T, Benoit B, Fernandes A, Streiner D, Inglis D, Zee R. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rev. 2017;2:CD008435.
    1. American Academy of Pedatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Prevention and management of procedural pain in the neonate: an update. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20154271. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4271.
    1. Marlier L, Gaugler C, Astruc D, Messer J. La sensibilité olfactive du nouveau-né prématuré. Arch Pediatr. 2007;14(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.09.006.
    1. Browne JV. Chemosensory development in the fetus and newborn. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2008;8(4):180–186. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2008.10.009.
    1. Allam MD-E, Marlier L, Schaal B. Learning at the breast: preference formation for an artificial scent and its attraction against the odor of maternal milk. Infant Behav Dev. 2006;29(3):308–321. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2005.12.008.
    1. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, Shekelle P, Stewart LA, Group P-P Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
    1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
    1. Pai M, McCulloch M, Gorman JD, Pai N, Enanoria W, Kennedy G, Tharyan P, Colford JM., Jr Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by step guide. Natl Med J India. 2004;17(2):86–95.
    1. Schmitt P, Mandel J, Guedj M. A comparison of six methods for missing data imputation. J Biomet Biostat. 2015;6(1):224.
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from .
    1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Group GW GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 2008;336(7650):924–926. doi: 10.1136/.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit