Evaluation of a community-based randomized controlled prenatal care trial in rural China

Zhuochun Wu, Kirsi Viisainen, Ying Wang, Elina Hemminki, Zhuochun Wu, Kirsi Viisainen, Ying Wang, Elina Hemminki

Abstract

Background: A community-based randomized control prenatal care trial was performed in a rural county of China during 2000-2003. The purpose of this paper is to describe the trial implementation and the impact of the trial on the utilization of prenatal care and perinatal outcomes.

Materials and methods: In the study county, 10 townships (from a total of 55) were each paired with a control (20 study townships in total), with the criteria for pairing being the township's socioeconomic development, perinatal health, and maternal care utilization and provision. One of each township pair was randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups. The trial interventions were: 1) training township hospital midwives and instructing them in how to provide systematic maternal care, 2) informing women in the community of the importance of prenatal care, 3) if needed, providing basic medical instruments to the hospitals. A variety of data sources were used to describe the trial implementation (observations, group discussions, field notes, survey to women). The data on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were from the original hand-written work-records in the village family planning centers of the study townships.

Results: Implementation of the intervention was deficient. The factors hindering the trial implementation included poor coordination between midwives and family planning officers, broader policy changes implemented by the provincial government during the trial, the decentralization of county governance, and the lack of government funding for maternal care. There was only little difference in the use of maternal care, in women's opinions related to maternal care or content of prenatal care, and no difference in the perinatal outcomes between the intervention and control townships.

Conclusions: A community based randomized controlled trial could not be fully carried out in rural China as planned due to the changing political landscape, the complexity of the socio-economic situation and a lengthy planning stage. The study could not answer if perinatal outcomes could be improved by increased use of prenatal care.

Trial registration: NCT 01054235.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01054235.

References

    1. Drazancic A. Antenatal care in developing countries. What shoud be done? Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 2001;29(3):188–98. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2001.028.
    1. Lumbiganon P, Winiyakul N, Chongsomchai C, Chaisiri K. From research to practice: the example of antenatal care in Thailand. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 2004;82(10):746–9.
    1. Zanconato G, Msolomba R, Guarenti L, Franchi M. Antenatal care in developing countries: the need for a tailored model. Seminars in Fetal and neonatal Medicine. 2006;11(1):15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2005.10.002.
    1. Hong R, Ruiz-Beltran Martin. Impact of prenatal care on infant survival in Bangladesh. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2007;11(2):199–206. doi: 10.1007/s10995-006-0147-2.
    1. Khan-Neelofur D, Gulmezoglu M, Villar J. WHO antenatal care trial group. Who should provide antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 1998;12(suppl 2):7–26.
    1. White DE, Fraser-Lee NJ, Tough S, Newburn-Cook CV. The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada. Health care for Women Internatational. 2006;27(9):777–92. doi: 10.1080/07399330600880335.
    1. Lu MC, Tache V, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, Halfon N. Preventing low birth weight: is prenatal care the answer? Journal of maternal-fetal and neonatal Medicine. 2003;13(6):362–80.
    1. Ickovics JR, Trace S, Westdahl C. et al.Group prenatal care and perinatal outcomes: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007;110(2, part1):330–339. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000275284.24298.23.
    1. Carroli G, Rooney C, Villar J. How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence. Paediatric and perinatal Epidemiology. 2001;15(suppl 1):1–42.
    1. Munjanja S, Lindmark G, Nystrom L. et al.Randomized controlled trial of a reduced-visits program of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe. The Lancet. 1996;348(9024):364–66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01250-0.
    1. Vidaff AC, Franzini L, Low M. The unrealized potential of prenatal care. A population health approach. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2003;48(11):837–42.
    1. Rumbold AR, Cunningham J. A review of the impact of antenatal care for Australian indigenous women and attempt to strengthen these services. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 2008;12(1):83–100. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0216-1.
    1. Greg R, Alexander MK. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Reports. 2001;116:306–316.
    1. Wu Z, Viisainen K, Li X, Hemminki E. Maternal care in rural China: a case study from Anhui province. BMC Health Services Research. 2008;8:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-55.
    1. Wu Z, Li X, Gao J, Xu L. Maternal care use in China from 1993to 2003. Chinese Primary Health Care. 2005;19(9):45–47.
    1. Fang J. Health sector reform and reproductive health services in poor rural China. Health Policy and Planning. 2004;19(Suppl.1):140–49.
    1. Bloom G, Tang S. Rural health prepayment scheme in China: toward a more active role for government. Social Science and Medicine. 1999;48(7):951–60. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00395-5.
    1. Tang S, Bloom G. Decentralizing rural health services: a case study in China. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 2000;15(3):189–200. doi: 10.1002/1099-1751(200007/09)15:3<189::AID-HPM590>;2-Q.
    1. Wu Z, Viisainen K, Hemminki E. Determinants of high sex ratio among newborns: A cohort study from rural Anhui province, China. Reproductive Health Matters. 2006;14(27):172–80. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27222-7.
    1. Wu Z, Viisainen K, Wang Y, Hemminki E. Perinatal mortality in rural China: restrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327:319–22.
    1. Wu X, Treiman DJ. The household registration system and social stratification in China:1955-1996. Demography. 2004;41(2):363–84. doi: 10.1353/dem.2004.0010.
    1. Wong L, Wai-po H. Reforming the household system: a preliminary glimpse of the blue chop household registration system in Shanghai and Shenzhen. International Migration Review. 1998;32(4):974–94. doi: 10.2307/2547668.
    1. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Analyzing Qualitative Data. Routledge, London; Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research; pp. 173–194. (Bryman A. & Burgess R.G. etc.)
    1. Donner A, Brikett N, Buck C. Randomisation by cluster: sample size requirements and analysis. Am J Epidemiology. 1981;114:906–14.
    1. Donner A, Donald A. The statistical analysis of multiple binary measurements. Journal of Chronic Diseases. 1988;41:899.
    1. Susser M. The tribulations of trials--Intervention in communities [Editorial] American Journal of Public Health. 1995;85(2):156–158. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.85.2.156.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit