Bone healing at non-submerged implants installed with different insertion torques: a split-mouth histomorphometric randomized controlled trial

Yoshiyuki Amari, Adriano Piattelli, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Natalia Fortich Mesa, Mauro Ferri, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli, Yoshiyuki Amari, Adriano Piattelli, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Natalia Fortich Mesa, Mauro Ferri, Giovanna Iezzi, Daniele Botticelli

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate histomorphometrically the healing at implants installed with standard or very low insertion torque values MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve volunteer patients were recruited, and two screw-shaped titanium devices were installed in the distal segments of the mandible using insertion torque values of either < 10 Ncm or ~ 30 Ncm. The implants were left to heal in a non-submerged fashion. After 8 weeks, biopsies were retrieved, and ground sections were prepared for histological evaluation.

Results: Histological slides from 11 patients were available for (n = 11). The new bone in contact with the implant surface was 39.3 ± 18.5% and 49.4 ± 9.4% at the < 10 and ~ 30 Ncm sites, respectively. Considering the pre-existing old bone, the total mineralized bone was 46.8 ± 22.1% at the < 10 Ncm sites and 57.0 ± 14.1% at the ~ 30 Ncm. No statistically significant differences were found. New bone density and total mineralized bone density were 36.6 ± 8.1% and 53.0 ± 13.5% at the < 10 Ncm sites and 35.9 ± 10.0% and 52.2 ± 16.0% at the ~ 30 Ncm sites, respectively. No statistically significant differences were disclosed.

Conclusion: From the data of the present study, it can be concluded that a trend of higher osseointegration was observed at the ~ 30 Ncm compared to the < 10 Ncm torque group. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that an implant installed with a very low torque may achieve a good integration.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04017156; trial retrospectively registered on 12 July 2019.

Keywords: Bone density; Bone-to-implant contact; Dental implants; Histology; Histomorphometry.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing of interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Customized solid titanium screw-shaped devices used. b Newton-meter to measure the torque
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Two devices installed, one using insertion torque of a) and one of ~ 30 Ncm (b)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Trephine used in an eccentric way to reduce the size of the biopsies. b Ground section illustrating the shape of the biopsies
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CONSORT 2010 flow diagram
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
a, b Photomicrographs of ground sections of devices installed with old bone (light blue stars). Images originally grabbed at × 100 magnification. Acid fuchsine and toluidine blue stain
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Photomicrographs of ground sections of devices installed with insertion torque (a) < 10 Ncm and (b) ~ 30 Ncm. Note newly formed bone (yellow stars) and pre-existing old bone (light blue stars) and marrow spaces. Image originally taken at × 200 magnification. Acid fuchsine and toluidine blue stain
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
a, b Photomicrographs of ground sections of devices installed with insertion torque ~ 30 Ncm. Note newly formed bone (yellow stars) and pre-existing old bone (light blue stars). Originally grabbed at × 100 magnification. Acid fuchsine and toluidine blue stain

References

    1. Trisi P, Todisco M, Consolo U, Travaglini D. High versus low implant insertion torque: a histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26:837–849.
    1. Cesaretti G, Botticelli D, Renzi A, et al. Radiographic evaluation of immediately loaded implants supporting 2-3 units fixed bridges in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:399–405. doi: 10.1111/clr.12565.
    1. Gallucci GO, Benic GI, Eckert SE, et al. Consensus statements and clinical recommendations for implant loading protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Suppl):287–290. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2013.g4.
    1. Pantani F, Botticelli D, Garcia IR, Jr, et al. Influence of lateral pressure to the implant bed on osseointegration: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1264–1270. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01941.x.
    1. Rea M, Lang NP, Ricci S, et al. Healing of implants installed in over- or under-prepared sites--an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:442–446. doi: 10.1111/clr.12390.
    1. Rea M, Botticelli D, Ricci S, et al. Influence of immediate loading on healing of implants installed with different insertion torques--an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:90–95. doi: 10.1111/clr.12305.
    1. Barone A, Alfonsi F, Derchi G, et al. The effect of insertion torque on the clinical outcome of single implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18:588–600. doi: 10.1111/cid.12337.
    1. Verardi S, Swoboda J, Rebaudi F, Rebaudi A. Osteointegration of tissue-level implants with very low insertion torque in soft bone: a clinical study on SLA surface treatment. Implant Dent. 2018;27:5–9. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000714.
    1. Verrastro Neto A, Andrade R, Corrêa MG, et al. The impact of different torques for the insertion of immediately loaded implants on the peri-implant levels of angiogenesis- and bone-related markers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:651–657. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.11.001.
    1. Duyck J, Corpas L, Vermeiren S, et al. Histological, histomorphometrical, and radiological evaluation of an experimental implant design with a high insertion torque. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:877–884.
    1. Duyck J, Roesems R, Cardoso MV, et al. Effect of insertion torque on titanium implant osseointegration: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:191–196. doi: 10.1111/clr.12316.
    1. Muktadar AK, Gangaiah M, Chrcanovic BR, Chowdhary R. Evaluation of the effect of self-cutting and nonself-cutting thread designed implant with different thread depth on variable insertion torques: an histomorphometric analysis in rabbits. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20:507–514. doi: 10.1111/cid.12611.
    1. Berardini M, Trisi P, Sinjari B, et al. The effects of high insertion torque versus low insertion torque on marginal bone resorption and implant failure rates: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Implant Dent. 2016;25:532–540. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000422.
    1. Balshi SF, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. A retrospective analysis of 44 implants with no rotational primary stability used for fixed prosthesis anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:467–471.
    1. Rodrigo D, Aracil L, Martin C, Sanz M. Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival: a prospective case series study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:255–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01820.x.
    1. Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, et al. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:293–299. doi: 10.1111/clr.12475.
    1. Ferri M, Lang NP, Angarita Alfonso EE, et al. Use of sonic instruments for implant biopsy retrieval. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26:1237–1243. doi: 10.1111/clr.12466.
    1. Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns--a prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):471–477. doi: 10.1111/clr.12409.
    1. Rossi F, Botticelli D, Cesaretti G, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(4):458–464. doi: 10.1111/clr.12564.
    1. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:572–578. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x.
    1. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:142–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01014.x.
    1. Omori Y, Iezzi G, Perrotti V, et al. Influence of the buccal bone crest width on peri-implant hard and soft tissues dimensions: a histomorphometric study in humans. Implant Dent. 2018;27:415–423. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000772.
    1. Yonezawa D, Piattelli A, Favero R, et al. Bone healing at functionally loaded and unloaded screw-shaped implants supporting single crowns: a histomorphometric study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:181–187. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5928.
    1. Nakajima Y, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, et al. Influence of the presence of alveolar mucosa at implants: a histological study in humans. Implant Dent. 2018. 10.1097/ID.0000000000000723.
    1. Mainetti T, Lang NP, Bengazi F, et al. Sequential healing at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27:130–138. doi: 10.1111/clr.12533.
    1. Rossi F, Lang NP, De Santis E, et al. Bone-healing pattern at the surface of titanium implants: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:124–131. doi: 10.1111/clr.12097.
    1. Botticelli D, Lang NP. Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models - a comparative analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28:742–748. doi: 10.1111/clr.12872.
    1. Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, et al. The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:357–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02107.x.
    1. Paul Stefan, Petsch Matthias, Held Ulrike. Modeling of Crestal Bone After Submerged vs Transmucosal Implant Placement: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2017;32(5):1039–1050. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5505.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit