Pill Properties that Cause Dysphagia and Treatment Failure

Jeremy Fields, Jorge T Go, Konrad S Schulze, Jeremy Fields, Jorge T Go, Konrad S Schulze

Abstract

Background: Pills (tablets and capsules) are widely used to administer prescription drugs or to take supplements such as vitamins. Unfortunately, little is known about how much effort it takes Americans to swallow these various pills. More specifically, it is not known to what extent hard-to-swallow pills might affect treatment outcomes (eg, interfering with adherence to prescribed medications or causing clinical complications). It is also unclear which properties (eg, size, shape, or surface texture) Americans prefer or reject for their pills. To learn more about these issues, we interviewed a small group of individuals.

Methods: We invited individuals in waiting rooms of our tertiary health care center to participate in structured interviews about their pill-taking habits and any problems they have swallowing pills. We inquired which pill properties they believed caused swallowing problems. Participants scored capsules and pills of representative size, shape, and texture for swallowing effort and reported their personal preferences.

Results: Of 100 successive individuals, 99 participants completed the interview (65% women, mean age = 41 years, range = 23-77 years). Eighty-three percent took pills daily (mean 4 pills/d; 56% of those pills were prescribed by providers). Fifty-four percent of participants replied yes to the question, "Did you ever have to swallow a solid medication that was too difficult?" Four percent recounted serious complications: 1% pill esophagitis, 1% pill impaction, and 2% stopped treatments (antibiotic and prenatal supplement) because they could not swallow the prescribed pills. Half of all participants routinely resorted to special techniques (eg, plenty of liquids or repeated or forceful swallows). Sixty-one percent of those having difficulties cited specific pill properties: 27% blamed size (20% of problems were caused by pills that were too large whereas 7% complained about pills that were too small to sense); 12% faulted rough surface texture; others cited sharp edges, odd shapes, or bad taste/smell. Extra-large pills were widely loathed, with 4 out of 5 participants preferring to take 3 or more medium-sized pills instead of a single jumbo pill.

Conclusions: Our survey results suggest that 4 out of 5 adult Americans take several pills daily, and do so without undue effort. It also suggests that half of today's Americans encounter pills that are hard to swallow. Up to 4% of our participants gave up on treatments because they could not swallow the prescribed pills. Up to 7% categorically rejected taking pills that are hard to swallow. Specific material properties are widely blamed for making pills hard to swallow; extra-large capsules and tablets are universally feared, whereas medium-sized pills with a smooth coating are widely preferred. Our findings suggest that health care providers could minimize treatment failures and complications by prescribing and dispensing pills that are easy to swallow. Industry and regulatory bodies may facilitate this by making swallowability an essential criterion in the design and licensing of oral medications. Such policies could lessen the burden of pill taking for Americans and improve the adherence with prescribed treatments.

Keywords: dysphagia; medical compounds; pill swallowing.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Examples of pills with different properties. In conjunction with Questionnaire 2 (Supplemental Figure 2), participants were shown and asked to feel commonly used pills. They were asked to place pills into score boxes labeled according to swallowing effort (1 = easy, 2 = slight, 3 = considerable, and 4 = hard/impossible). Participants were also asked to compare pills of different type (capsule vs tablet), size (large, medium, or small), shape (round or oblong), and coating/textures (firm, smooth, or crumbling) and indicate their preference of one over the other.

References

    1. Harris Interactive Survey online study between May 27 and June 4, 2003. . Schwarz Pharma, Inc., based in Milwaukee, WI. Accessed November 13, 2014
    1. Strachan I., Greener M. Medication-related swallowing difficulties may be more common than we realize. Pharmacy in Practice. 2005;15(10):411–414.
    1. Andersen O., Zweidorff O.K., Hjelde T., Rodland E.A. Problems when swallowing tablets. A questionnaire study from general practice. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen (abstract of Norwegian text) 1995 Mar 20;115(8):947–949. PMID: 7709385.
    1. Schiele J.T., Quinzler R., Klimm H.D., Pruszydlo M.G., Haefeli W.E. Difficulties swallowing solid oral dosage forms in a general practice population: prevalence, causes, and relationship to dosage forms. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;69(4):937–948.
    1. Carnaby-Mann G., Crary M. Pill swallowing by adults with dysphagia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Nov;131(11):970–975.
    1. Strachan I. Medicines and older people: a nurses’ guide to administration. Br J Community Nurs. 2001 Jun;6(6):296-301. PMID: 11873205. .
    1. Vakil N.B., Traxler B., Levine D. Dysphagia in patients with erosive esophagitis: prevalence, severity, and response to proton pump inhibitor treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Aug;2(8):665–668.
    1. Kawamura O., Easterling C., Aslam M., Rittmann T., Hofmann C., Shaker R. Laryngo-upper esophageal sphincter contractile reflex in humans deteriorates with age. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jul;127(1):57–64.
    1. Preston M., Morris H. Dysphagia, the impact on dispensing doctors. Dispensing Doctor J. 2005;21(3):11–15.
    1. Bending A. Hiding medicines or hiding problems? Nursing and Residential Care. 2001 Sep;3(9):439–441.
    1. Ferguson D.D., DeVault K.R. Dysphagia. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug;7(4):251–258. PMID: 15238199.
    1. Hey H, Jørgensen F, Sørensen K, Hasselbalch H,Wamberg T. Oesophageal transit of six commonly used tablets and capsules. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982 Dec 11;285(6356):1717-1719. 6816343. PMCID:PMC1500648.
    1. Williams R.B., Pal A., Brasseur J.G., Cook I.J. Space-time pressure structure of pharyngo-esophageal segment during swallowing. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001 Nov;281(5):G1290–G1300. PMID: 11668038.
    1. Nicosia M.A., Robbins J.A. The fluid mechanics of bolus ejection from the oral cavity. J Biomech. 2001 Dec;34(12):1537–1544. PMID: 11716855. .
    1. Dantas R.O., Kern M.K., Massey B.T., Dodds W.J., Kahrilas P.J., Brasseur J.G., Cook I.J., Lang I.M. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1990 May;258(5 Pt 1):G675–G681. PMID: 2333995.
    1. Dantas R.O., Dodds W.J., Massey B.T., Kern M.K. The effect of high- vs low-density barium preparations on the quantitative features of swallowing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989 Dec;153(6):1191–1195.
    1. Cook I.J., Dodds W.J., Dantas R.O., Massey B., Kern M.K., Lang I.M., Brasseur J.G., Hogan W.J. Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter. Am J Physiol. 1989 Nov;257(5 Pt 1):G748–G759.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit