The effect of gadolinium-based contrast-agents on automated brain atrophy measurements by FreeSurfer in patients with multiple sclerosis

Ingrid Anne Lie, Emma Kerklingh, Kristin Wesnes, David R van Nederpelt, Iman Brouwer, Øivind Torkildsen, Kjell-Morten Myhr, Frederik Barkhof, Lars Bø, Hugo Vrenken, Ingrid Anne Lie, Emma Kerklingh, Kristin Wesnes, David R van Nederpelt, Iman Brouwer, Øivind Torkildsen, Kjell-Morten Myhr, Frederik Barkhof, Lars Bø, Hugo Vrenken

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether reliable brain atrophy measures can be obtained from post-contrast 3D T1-weighted images in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) using FreeSurfer.

Methods: Twenty-two patients with MS were included, in which 3D T1-weighted MR images were obtained during the same scanner visit, with the same acquisition protocol, before and after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). Two FreeSurfer versions (v.6.0.1 and v.7.1.1.) were applied to calculate grey matter (GM) and white matter (WM) volumes and global and regional cortical thickness. The consistency between measures obtained in pre- and post-contrast images was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), the difference was investigated by paired t-tests, and the mean percentage increase or decrease was calculated for total WM and GM matter volume, total deep GM and thalamus volume, and mean cortical thickness.

Results: Good to excellent reliability was found between all investigated measures, with ICC ranging from 0.926 to 0.996, all p values < 0.001. GM volumes and cortical thickness measurements were significantly higher in post-contrast images by 3.1 to 17.4%, while total WM volume decreased significantly by 1.7% (all p values < 0.001).

Conclusion: The consistency between values obtained from pre- and post-contrast images was excellent, suggesting it may be possible to extract reliable brain atrophy measurements from T1-weighted images acquired after administration of GBCAs, using FreeSurfer. However, absolute values were systematically different between pre- and post-contrast images, meaning that such images should not be compared directly. Potential systematic effects, possibly dependent on GBCA dose or the delay time after contrast injection, should be investigated.

Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov. identifier: NCT00360906.

Key points: • The influence of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) on atrophy measurements is still largely unknown and challenges the use of a considerable source of historical and prospective real-world data. • In 22 patients with multiple sclerosis, the consistency between brain atrophy measurements obtained from pre- and post-contrast images was excellent, suggesting it may be possible to extract reliable atrophy measurements in T1-weighted images acquired after administration of GBCAs, using FreeSurfer. • Absolute values were systematically different between pre- and post-contrast images, meaning that such images should not be compared directly, and measurements extracted from certain regions (e.g., the temporal pole) should be interpreted with caution.

Keywords: Atrophy; Gadolinium; Grey matter; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis.

Conflict of interest statement

I.A. Lie declares no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

E. Kerklingh declares no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

K. Wesnes has received unrestricted research grants from Novartis and Biogen, and speaker honoraria from Biogen.

D.R. van Nederpelt declares no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

I. Brouwer has received research support from Merck KGaA, Novartis, and Teva.

Ø. Torkildsen has received research grants and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Roche, Novartis, Merck, and Sanofi.

K.M. Myhr has received unrestricted research grants to his institution; scientific advisory board, and speaker honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva; and has participated in clinical trials organised by Biogen, Merck, Novartis, and Roche.

F. Barkhof has received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Bracco, and IXICO.

L. Bø has received unrestricted research grants to his institution and/or scientific advisory board or speaker’s honoraria from Almirall, Biogen, Genzyme, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva; and has participated in clinical trials organised by Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Genzyme.

H. Vrenken has received research grants from Pfizer, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Teva, speaker honoraria from Novartis, and consulting fees from Merck Serono; all funds were paid directly to his institution.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Post-contrast T1-weighted MRI, showing the border between WM and GM (white surface) (yellow), and the border between GM and CSF (pial surface) (red). a Axial slice showing a moderate pial surface “looping error” (white arrow). b Sagittal slice showing a typical skull stripping failure; a moderate error of the pial surface expanding into the dura and the sagittal sinus (white arrow)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
T1-weighted MRI, showing the segmentation of the left Thalamus in pre- and post-contrast images, in two different patients (subject E3 (ad) and subject C1 (eh)). a–d Axial slices demonstrating the typical quality of thalamus segmentations. In post-contrast images (cd), the medial border of the left Thalamus is slightly overestimated (arrow) compared to pre-contrast images (arrowhead) (ab), most likely due to hyperintense signal from extraparenchymal structures in the midline. eh Axial slices demonstrating a more severe overestimation of the medial border of the left Thalamus (arrow) in post-contrast images (gh) compared to pre-contrast images (arrow head) (ef). Again, the segmentation of the medial border is overestimated due to inclusion of extraparenchymal hyperintense structures, in this case, the internal cerebral vein)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pre-contrast (ac) and post-contrast (df) T1-weighted images obtained from the same patient (subject A3) in the same MRI session. b and e show the white surface, which is the border between white and grey matter as automatically constructed by FreeSurfer (yellow). c and f show the pial surface, which is similarly the automatically constructed border between grey matter and cerebrospinal fluid (red), derived from the white surface. The figure demonstrates a typical failure of moderate degree, where the white surface fails to include parts of the temporal poles in the post-contrast image (e) (arrow), with subsequent mistakes in the pial surface (f) (arrowhead)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Boxplots of MRI measurements obtained before (yellow) and after (red) GBCA administration, in mL (a, c, d) and mm (b)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scatterplots of global (a) and regional (b) MRI measurements obtained before and after GBCA administration. The green lines indicate identity lines
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Heatmaps demonstrating the difference (mm) in cortical thickness in the left (a) and right (b) hemisphere after administration of GBCAs. Brown colours indicate an increase in cortical thickness, and purple colours indicate a decrease in cortical thickness (colour range between -1.6 mm and + 1.6 mm cortical thickness difference). Letters in subject names indicate MRI scanner (ag)

References

    1. Popescu V, Klaver R, Voorn P, et al. What drives MRI-measured cortical atrophy in multiple sclerosis? Mult Scler. 2015;21:1280–1290. doi: 10.1177/1352458514562440.
    1. Horakova D, Dwyer MG, Havrdova E, et al. Gray matter atrophy and disability progression in patients with early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a 5-year longitudinal study. J Neurol Sci. 2009;282:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.12.005.
    1. Zivadinov R, Bergsland N, Dolezal O, et al. Evolution of cortical and thalamus atrophy and disability progression in early relapsing-remitting MS during 5 years. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34:1931–1939. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3503.
    1. Fisher E, Lee J-C, Nakamura K, Rudick RA. Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Ann Neurol. 2008;64:255–265. doi: 10.1002/ana.21436.
    1. Sotirchos ES, Gonzalez-Caldito N, Dewey BE, et al. Effect of disease-modifying therapies on subcortical gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2020;26:312–321. doi: 10.1177/1352458519826364.
    1. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Pagani E, et al. Placebo-controlled trial of oral laquinimod in multiple sclerosis: MRI evidence of an effect on brain tissue damage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85:851–858. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306132.
    1. Gaetano L, Haring DA, Radue EW, et al. Fingolimod effect on gray matter, thalamus, and white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2018;90:e1324–e1332. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005292.
    1. Kuperberg GR, Broome MR, McGuire PK, et al. Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003;60:878–888. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.878.
    1. Rosas HD, Liu AK, Hersch S, et al. Regional and progressive thinning of the cortical ribbon in Huntington’s disease. Neurology. 2002;58:695–701. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.5.695.
    1. Tustison NJ, Cook PA, Klein A, et al. Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurements. Neuroimage. 2014;99:166–179. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.044.
    1. Schmidt MF, Storrs JM, Freeman KB, et al. A comparison of manual tracing and FreeSurfer for estimating hippocampal volume over the adult lifespan. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39:2500–2513. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24017.
    1. Cardinale F, Chinnici G, Bramerio M, et al. Validation of FreeSurfer-estimated brain cortical thickness: comparison with histologic measurements. Neuroinformatics. 2014;12:535–542. doi: 10.1007/s12021-014-9229-2.
    1. Eshaghi A, Prados F, Brownlee WJ, et al. Deep gray matter volume loss drives disability worsening in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2018;83:210–222. doi: 10.1002/ana.25145.
    1. Steenwijk MD, Geurts JJ, Daams M, et al. Cortical atrophy patterns in multiple sclerosis are non-random and clinically relevant. Brain. 2016;139:115–126. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv337.
    1. Calabrese M, Atzori M, Bernardi V, et al. Cortical atrophy is relevant in multiple sclerosis at clinical onset. J Neurol. 2007;254:1212–1220. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0503-6.
    1. Zijdenbos AP, Forghani R, Evans AC. Automatic “pipeline” analysis of 3-D MRI data for clinical trials: application to multiple sclerosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002;21:1280–1291. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2002.806283.
    1. Nakamura K, Fox R, Fisher E. CLADA: cortical longitudinal atrophy detection algorithm. Neuroimage. 2011;54:278–289. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.052.
    1. Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, et al. Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage. 2002;17:479–489. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1040.
    1. Rovira À, Wattjes MP, Tintoré M, et al. MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis—clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:471–482. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2015.106.
    1. Saade C, Bou-Fakhredin R, Yousem DM, Asmar K, Naffaa L, El-Merhi F. Gadolinium and multiple sclerosis: vessels, barriers of the brain, and glymphatics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39:2168–2176. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5773.
    1. Rogosnitzky M, Branch S. Gadolinium-based contrast agent toxicity: a review of known and proposed mechanisms. Biometals. 2016;29:365–376. doi: 10.1007/s10534-016-9931-7.
    1. Kanda T, Oba H, Toyoda K, Kitajima K, Furui S. Brain gadolinium deposition after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34:3–9. doi: 10.1007/s11604-015-0503-5.
    1. Hannoun S, Baalbaki M, Haddad R, et al. Gadolinium effect on thalamus and whole brain tissue segmentation. Neuroradiology. 2018;60:1167–1173. doi: 10.1007/s00234-018-2082-5.
    1. Warntjes JB, Tisell A, Landtblom AM, Lundberg P. Effects of gadolinium contrast agent administration on automatic brain tissue classification of patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:1330–1336. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3890.
    1. Torkildsen O, Wergeland S, Bakke S, et al. omega-3 fatty acid treatment in multiple sclerosis (OFAMS Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1044–1051. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2012.283.
    1. McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001;50:121–127. doi: 10.1002/ana.1032.
    1. Schmidt P, Gaser C, Arsic M, et al. An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroimage. 2012;59:3774–3783. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.032.
    1. Battaglini M, Jenkinson M, De Stefano N. Evaluating and reducing the impact of white matter lesions on brain volume measurements. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:2062–2071. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21344.
    1. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–781. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021.
    1. Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999;9:179–194. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395.
    1. Desikan RS, Ségonne F, Fischl B, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–980. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021.
    1. Esteban O, Birman D, Schaer M, Koyejo OO, Poldrack RA, Gorgolewski KJ. MRIQC: advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0184661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661.
    1. Zhang Y, Brady M, Smith S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001;20:45–57. doi: 10.1109/42.906424.
    1. Giavarina D. Understanding Bland Altman analysis. Biochem Med. 2015;25:141–151. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015.
    1. Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
    1. Neacsu V, Jasperse B, Korteweg T, et al. Agreement between different input image types in brain atrophy measurement in multiple sclerosis using SIENAX and SIENA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:559–565. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21501.
    1. Liu Y, Lukas C, Steenwijk MD, et al. Multicenter validation of mean upper cervical cord area measurements from head 3D T1-weighted MR imaging in patients with multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:749–754. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4635.
    1. Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage. 2006;32:180–194. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051.
    1. Fennema-Notestine C, Ozyurt IB, Clark CP, et al. Quantitative evaluation of automated skull-stripping methods applied to contemporary and legacy images: effects of diagnosis, bias correction, and slice location. Hum Brain Mapp. 2006;27:99–113. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20161.
    1. McCarthy CS, Ramprashad A, Thompson C, Botti J-A, Coman IL, Kates WR. A comparison of FreeSurfer-generated data with and without manual intervention. Front Neurosci. 2015 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00379.
    1. Fischl B, Dale AM. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:11050–11055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.200033797.
    1. Oguz I, Cates J, Fletcher T et al (2008) Cortical correspondence using entropy-based particle systems and local features.10.1109/ISBI.2008.4541327
    1. Panman JL, To YY, van der Ende EL, et al. Bias introduced by multiple head coils in MRI research: an 8 channel and 32 channel coil comparison. Front Neurosci. 2019 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00729.
    1. Li H, Smith SM, Gruber S et al (2018) Combining multi-site/multi-study MRI data: linked-ICA denoising for removing scanner and site variability from multimodal MRI data. bioRxiv. 10.1101/337576:337576
    1. Battaglini M, Gentile G, Luchetti L, et al. Lifespan normative data on rates of brain volume changes. Neurobiol Aging. 2019;81:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.05.010.
    1. Guo C, Ferreira D, Fink K, Westman E, Granberg T. Repeatability and reproducibility of FreeSurfer, FSL-SIENAX and SPM brain volumetric measurements and the effect of lesion filling in multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1355–1364. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5710-x.
    1. Platten M, Martola J, Fink K, Ouellette R, Piehl F, Granberg T. MRI-based manual versus automated corpus callosum volumetric measurements in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. 2020;30:198–204. doi: 10.1111/jon.12676.
    1. Calabrese M, Rinaldi F, Grossi P, Gallo P. Cortical pathology and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Neurother. 2011;11:425–432. doi: 10.1586/ern.10.155.
    1. Inglese M, Petracca M, Mormina E, et al. Cerebellar volume as imaging outcome in progressive multiple sclerosis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176519.
    1. Chu R, Kim G, Tauhid S, Khalid F, Healy BC, Bakshi R. Whole brain and deep gray matter atrophy detection over 5 years with 3T MRI in multiple sclerosis using a variety of automated segmentation pipelines. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206939.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit