Effect of Repeated Glucagon Doses on Hepatic Glycogen in Type 1 Diabetes: Implications for a Bihormonal Closed-Loop System

Jessica R Castle, Joseph El Youssef, Parkash A Bakhtiani, Yu Cai, Jade M Stobbe, Deborah Branigan, Katrina Ramsey, Peter Jacobs, Ravi Reddy, Mark Woods, W Kenneth Ward, Jessica R Castle, Joseph El Youssef, Parkash A Bakhtiani, Yu Cai, Jade M Stobbe, Deborah Branigan, Katrina Ramsey, Peter Jacobs, Ravi Reddy, Mark Woods, W Kenneth Ward

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate subjects with type 1 diabetes for hepatic glycogen depletion after repeated doses of glucagon, simulating delivery in a bihormonal closed-loop system.

Research design and methods: Eleven adult subjects with type 1 diabetes participated. Subjects underwent estimation of hepatic glycogen using (13)C MRS. MRS was performed at the following four time points: fasting and after a meal at baseline, and fasting and after a meal after eight doses of subcutaneously administered glucagon at a dose of 2 µg/kg, for a total mean dose of 1,126 µg over 16 h. The primary and secondary end points were, respectively, estimated hepatic glycogen by MRS and incremental area under the glucose curve for a 90-min interval after glucagon administration.

Results: In the eight subjects with complete data sets, estimated glycogen stores were similar at baseline and after repeated glucagon doses. In the fasting state, glycogen averaged 21 ± 3 g/L before glucagon administration and 25 ± 4 g/L after glucagon administration (mean ± SEM) (P = NS). In the fed state, glycogen averaged 40 ± 2 g/L before glucagon administration and 34 ± 4 g/L after glucagon administration (P = NS). With the use of an insulin action model, the rise in glucose after the last dose of glucagon was comparable to the rise after the first dose, as measured by the 90-min incremental area under the glucose curve.

Conclusions: In adult subjects with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (mean A1C 7.2%), glycogen stores and the hyperglycemic response to glucagon administration are maintained even after receiving multiple doses of glucagon. This finding supports the safety of repeated glucagon delivery in the setting of a bihormonal closed-loop system.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01986231.

© 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Median venous blood glucose values in milligrams per deciliter (top graph) and median insulin infusion rates in units per hour (bottom graph). The interquartile range is shown in gray. Meals (white squares) and glucagon doses (black triangles) are also shown. Note that glucose levels consistently rose after each glucagon dose. The insulin infusion rate was fixed after the first and last glucagon dose, but was otherwise adjusted to bring the glucose concentration into the target range.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated individual and group mean glycogen stores with SEM before (white squares) and after (black circles) glucagon administration in subjects with type 1 diabetes, under fed and fasting conditions (n = 8). Liver glycogen stores after eight doses of glucagon were similar to baseline levels.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean incremental glucose AUC with SEM after each of eight doses of glucagon. The modeled AUC accounting for the effects of meals, dextrose, and insulin was subtracted from the observed AUC to isolate the effect of each glucagon dose.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Diabetes Statistics Report: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States, 2014. Atlanta, GA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2014
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993;329:977–986
    1. Peyser T, Dassau E, Breton M, Skyler JS. The artificial pancreas: current status and future prospects in the management of diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2014;1311:102–123
    1. Lindholm A, Jacobsen LV. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001;40:641–659
    1. Graf CJ, Woodworth JR, Seger ME, Holcombe JH, Bowsher RR, Lynch R. Pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic comparisons of recombinant and animal-source glucagon after IV, IM, and SC injection in healthy volunteers. J Pharm Sci 1999;88:991–995
    1. Kadish AH. Automation control of blood sugar a servomechanism for glucose monitoring and control. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1963;9:363–367
    1. Castle JR, Engle JM, El Youssef J, et al. . Novel use of glucagon in a closed-loop system for prevention of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1282–1287
    1. Jacobs PG, El Youssef J, Castle J, et al. . Automated control of an adaptive bihormonal, dual-sensor artificial pancreas and evaluation during inpatient studies. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2014;61:2569–2581
    1. Russell SJ, El-Khatib FH, Sinha M, et al. . Outpatient glycemic control with a bionic pancreas in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371:313–325
    1. Haidar A, Legault L, Dallaire M, et al. . Glucose-responsive insulin and glucagon delivery (dual-hormone artificial pancreas) in adults with type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover controlled trial. CMAJ 2013;185:297–305
    1. Haidar A, Legault L, Messier V, Mitre TM, Leroux C, Rabasa-Lhoret R. Comparison of dual-hormone artificial pancreas, single-hormone artificial pancreas, and conventional insulin pump therapy for glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: an open-label randomised controlled crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:17–26
    1. Castle JR, Engle JM, El Youssef J, Massoud RG, Ward WK. Factors influencing the effectiveness of glucagon for preventing hypoglycemia. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4:1305–1310
    1. Lockton JA, Poucher SM. Single dose glucagon (0.5 mg IV bolus) administration in healthy human volunteers is a robust model for assessment of glycogenolysis: characterisation of the glucose excursion after glucagon challenge. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 2007;55:86–90
    1. Kishore P, Gabriely I, Cui MH, et al. . Role of hepatic glycogen breakdown in defective counterregulation of hypoglycemia in intensively treated type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2006;55:659–666
    1. Bischof MG, Krssak M, Krebs M, et al. . Effects of short-term improvement of insulin treatment and glycemia on hepatic glycogen metabolism in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2001;50:392–398
    1. Goldberg PA, Siegel MD, Sherwin RS, et al. . Implementation of a safe and effective insulin infusion protocol in a medical intensive care unit. Diabetes Care 2004;27:461–467
    1. Shulman GI, Rothman DL, Chung Y, et al. . 13C NMR studies of glycogen turnover in the perfused rat liver. J Biol Chem 1988;263:5027–5029
    1. Jue T, Rothman DL, Shulman GI, Tavitian BA, DeFronzo RA, Shulman RG. Direct observation of glycogen synthesis in human muscle with 13C NMR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:4489–4491
    1. Gruetter R, Magnusson I, Rothman DL, Avison MJ, Shulman RG, Shulman GI. Validation of 13C NMR measurements of liver glycogen in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:583–588
    1. Wolever TM. Effect of blood sampling schedule and method of calculating the area under the curve on validity and precision of glycaemic index values. Br J Nutr 2004;91:295–301
    1. Hovorka R, Canonico V, Chassin LJ, et al. . Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Physiol Meas 2004;25:905–920
    1. Wilinska ME, Chassin LJ, Schaller HC, Schaupp L, Pieber TR, Hovorka R. Insulin kinetics in type-I diabetes: continuous and bolus delivery of rapid acting insulin. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:3–12
    1. Landau BR, Wahren J, Chandramouli V, Schumann WC, Ekberg K, Kalhan SC. Contributions of gluconeogenesis to glucose production in the fasted state. J Clin Invest 1996;98:378–385
    1. Bakhtiani PA, El Youssef J, Duell AK, et al. . Factors affecting the success of glucagon delivered during an automated closed-loop system in type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2015;29:93–98
    1. El Youssef J, Castle JR, Bakhtiani PA, et al. . Quantification of the glycemic response to microdoses of subcutaneous glucagon at varying insulin levels. Diabetes Care 2014;37:3054–3060
    1. Kropff J, Bruttomesso D, Doll W, et al. . Accuracy of two continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison under clinical research centre and daily life conditions. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:343–349
    1. Jackson MA, Caputo N, Castle JR, David LL, Roberts CT Jr, Ward WK. Stable liquid glucagon formulations for rescue treatment and bi-hormonal closed-loop pancreas. Curr Diab Rep 2012;12:705–710
    1. Bakhtiani PA, Caputo N, Castle JR, et al. . A novel, stable, aqueous glucagon formulation using ferulic acid as an excipient. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;9:17–23
    1. Newswanger B, Ammons S, Phadnis N, et al. . Development of a highly stable, nonaqueous glucagon formulation for delivery via infusion pump systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;9:24–33
    1. Pohl R, Li M, Krasner A, De Souza E. Development of stable liquid glucagon formulations for use in artificial pancreas. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2015;9:8–16

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit