Satisfactory Analgesia with Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries (SAME DayS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus hydromorphone

Harsha Shanthanna, James Paul, Peter Lovrics, P J Devereaux, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane, Harsha Shanthanna, James Paul, Peter Lovrics, P J Devereaux, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane

Abstract

Introduction: There has been an exponential increase in the number of ambulatory surgeries (AS). Pain and postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) affects the recovery, discharge and overall satisfaction of patients having AS. Opioids remain the primary modality for moderate to severe pain. Since there is no perfect opioid, physicians should ideally use the opioid that optimally balances benefits and risks. Present decisions on the choice between morphine (M) and hydromorphone (HM) are based on individual experience and observation. Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients having AS achieving satisfactory analgesia without significant PONV when using M compared with HM. Secondarily we will compare the proportion of patients with adverse events, analgesic used, patient satisfaction, time to discharge and postdischarge symptoms.

Methods and analysis: This is a two-arm, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial of 400 patients having AS. Eligible patients undergoing AS of the abdominal and pelvic regions with a potential to cause moderate to severe pain will be recruited in the preoperative clinic. Using a computer-generated randomization, with a 1:1 allocation ratio, patients will be randomised to M or HM. Patients, healthcare providers and research personnel will be blinded. Study interventions will be administered in the recovery using equianalgesic doses of M or HM in concealed syringes. Patients will be followed in hospital and up to 3 months. Intention-to-treat approach will be used for analysis.

Ethics and dissemination: This study has been approved by the Hamilton integrated research ethics board. We plan to publish our trial findings and present our findings at scientific meetings.

Trail registration number: NCT02223377; Pre-results.

Keywords: adult anaesthesia; hydromorphone; morphine; pain management; ponv; vomiting.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Satisfactory Analgesia with Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries study Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram.

References

    1. Sarin P, Philip BK, Mitani A, et al. . Specialized ambulatory anesthesia teams contribute to decreased ambulatory surgery recovery room length of stay. Ochsner J 2012;12:94–100.
    1. Troy AM, Cunningham AJ. Ambulatory surgery: an overview. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2002;15:647–57. 10.1097/00001503-200212000-00008
    1. Shnaider I, Chung F. Outcomes in day surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:622–9. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328010107e
    1. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, et al. . Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652–8.
    1. Chatterjee S, Rudra A, Sengupta S. Current concepts in the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2011;2011:1–10. 10.1155/2011/748031
    1. Lovatsis D, José JB, Tufman A, et al. . Assessment of patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management after ambulatory gynaecologic laparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:664–7. 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32552-X
    1. White PF. Pain management after ambulatory surgery - where is the disconnect? Can J Anaesth 2008;55:201–7. 10.1007/BF03021503
    1. Chung F, Mezei G. Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1352–9.
    1. Habib AS, Chen YT, Taguchi A, et al. . Postoperative nausea and vomiting following inpatient surgeries in a teaching hospital: a retrospective database analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1093–9. 10.1185/030079906X104830
    1. Gan T, Sloan F, Dear GL, et al. . How much are patients willing to pay to avoid postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg 2001;92:393–400. 10.1213/00000539-200102000-00022
    1. Felden L, Walter C, Harder S, et al. . Comparative clinical effects of hydromorphone and morphine: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2011;107:319–28. 10.1093/bja/aer232
    1. Maxwell LG, Kaufmann SC, Bitzer S, et al. . The effects of a small-dose naloxone infusion on opioid-induced side effects and analgesia in children and adolescents treated with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia: a double-blind, prospective, randomized, controlled study. Anesth Analg 2005;100:953–8. 10.1213/01.ANE.0000148618.17736.3C
    1. Karl HW, Tyler DC, Miser AW. Controlled trial of morphine vs hydromorphone for patient-controlled analgesia in children with postoperative pain. Pain Med 2012;13:1658–9. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01496.x
    1. Aubrun F, Mazoit JX, Riou B. Postoperative intravenous morphine titration. Br J Anaesth 2012;108:193–201. 10.1093/bja/aer458
    1. Patanwala AE, Keim SM, Erstad BL. Intravenous opioids for severe acute pain in the emergency department. Ann Pharmacother 2010;44:1800–9. 10.1345/aph.1P438
    1. Chang AK, Bijur PE, Meyer RH, et al. . Safety and efficacy of hydromorphone as an analgesic alternative to morphine in acute pain: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:164–72. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.03.005
    1. Chang AK, Bijur PE, Baccelieri A, et al. . Efficacy and safety profile of a single dose of hydromorphone compared with morphine in older adults with acute, severe pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2009;7:1–10. 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.02.002
    1. Rapp SE, Egan KJ, Ross BK, et al. . A multidimensional comparison of morphine and hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1996;82:1043–8.
    1. Hong D, Flood P, Diaz G. The side effects of morphine and hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 2008;107:1384–9. 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181823efb
    1. Wu CL, Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, et al. . Systematic review and analysis of postdischarge symptoms after outpatient surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;96:994–1003.
    1. Odom-Forren J, Rayens MK, Gokun Y, et al. . The relationship of pain and nausea in postoperative patients for 1 week after ambulatory surgery. Clin J Pain 2015;31:845-51 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000170
    1. Ogurlu M, Sari S, Küçük M, et al. . Comparison of the effect of propofol and sevoflurane anaesthesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain after hysterectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2014;42:365–70.
    1. Kehlet H, Jensen TS, Woolf CJ. Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention. Lancet 2006;367:1618–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68700-X
    1. Apfel CC, Philip BK, Cakmakkaya OS, et al. . Who is at risk for postdischarge nausea and vomiting after ambulatory surgery? Anesthesiology 2012;117:475–86. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318267ef31
    1. McIntosh S, Adams J. Anxiety and quality of recovery in day surgery: A questionnaire study using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Quality of Recovery Score. Int J Nurs Pract 2011;17:85–92. 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01910.x
    1. Gramke HF, de Rijke JM, van Kleef M, et al. . Predictive factors of postoperative pain after day-case surgery. Clin J Pain 2009;25:455–60. 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31819a6e34
    1. Schug SA, Chong C. Pain management after ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22:738–43. 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32833020f4
    1. Ding L, Zhang H, Mi W, et al. . Effects of dexmedetomidine on anesthesia recovery period and postoperative cognitive function of patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:11388–95.
    1. Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, et al. . Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain 2005;113(1-2):9–19. 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:726–32. 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232
    1. Kahan BC, Morris TP. Adjusting for multiple prognostic factors in the analysis of randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:99 10.1186/1471-2288-13-99
    1. Ip HY, Abrishami A, Peng PW, et al. . Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review. Anesthesiology 2009;111:657–77. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae87a
    1. Aubrun F, Amour J, Rosenthal D, et al. . Effects of a loading dose of morphine before i.v. morphine titration for postoperative pain relief: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-control study. Br J Anaesth 2007;98:124–30. 10.1093/bja/ael284

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit