The Differences in Antibiotic Decision-making Between Acute Surgical and Acute Medical Teams: An Ethnographic Study of Culture and Team Dynamics

E Charani, R Ahmad, T M Rawson, E Castro-Sanchèz, C Tarrant, A H Holmes, E Charani, R Ahmad, T M Rawson, E Castro-Sanchèz, C Tarrant, A H Holmes

Abstract

Background: Cultural and social determinants influence antibiotic decision-making in hospitals. We investigated and compared cultural determinants of antibiotic decision-making in acute medical and surgical specialties.

Methods: An ethnographic observational study of antibiotic decision-making in acute medical and surgical teams at a London teaching hospital was conducted (August 2015-May 2017). Data collection included 500 hours of direct observations, and face-to-face interviews with 23 key informants. A grounded theory approach, aided by Nvivo 11 software, analyzed the emerging themes. An iterative and recursive process of analysis ensured saturation of the themes. The multiple modes of enquiry enabled cross-validation and triangulation of the findings.

Results: In medicine, accepted norms of the decision-making process are characterized as collectivist (input from pharmacists, infectious disease, and medical microbiology teams), rationalized, and policy-informed, with emphasis on de-escalation of therapy. The gaps in antibiotic decision-making in acute medicine occur chiefly in the transition between the emergency department and inpatient teams, where ownership of the antibiotic prescription is lost. In surgery, team priorities are split between 3 settings: operating room, outpatient clinic, and ward. Senior surgeons are often absent from the ward, leaving junior staff to make complex medical decisions. This results in defensive antibiotic decision-making, leading to prolonged and inappropriate antibiotic use.

Conclusions: In medicine, the legacy of infection diagnosis made in the emergency department determines antibiotic decision-making. In surgery, antibiotic decision-making is perceived as a nonsurgical intervention that can be delegated to junior staff or other specialties. Different, bespoke approaches to optimize antibiotic prescribing are therefore needed to address these specific challenges.

Keywords: antimicrobial decision-making; culture; team dynamics.

© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The model of culture used in this study to study antibiotic decision-making [6]. Abbreviation: ASP, antibiotic stewardship program.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The data gathering and analysis process.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
The key team dynamics and characteristics of the ward rounds (derived from field notes). Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; WCC, white cell count.

References

    1. Davey P, Marwick CA, Scott CL, et al. . Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2:CD003543.
    1. O’Neill J. Review on antimicrobial resistance. Tackling a global health crisis: rapid diagnostics: stopping unnecessary use of antibiotics. Indep Rev AMR 2015:1–36.
    1. Tamma PD, Cosgrove SE. Antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2011; 25:245–60.
    1. Braithwaite J, Herkes J, Ludlow K, Lamprell G, Testa L. Association between organisational and workplace cultures, and patient outcomes: systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e013758.
    1. Dixon-Woods M, Baker R, Charles K, et al. . Culture and behaviour in the English National Health Service: overview of lessons from a large multimethod study. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23:106–15.
    1. Spradley JP. Ethnography for what? In: Participant observation. USA: Thomson Learning 1980:13–25.
    1. Triandis H. The many dimensions of culture. Acad Manag J 2004; 18:88–93.
    1. Barach P, Johnson JK. Understanding the complexity of redesigning care around the clinical microsystem. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15(Suppl 1):i10–6.
    1. Kosnik LK, Espinosa JA. Microsystems in health care: part 7. The microsystem as a platform for merging strategic planning and operations. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2003; 29:452–9.
    1. Davey P, Peden C, Charani E, Marwick C, Michie S. Time for action-Improving the design and reporting of behaviour change interventions for antimicrobial stewardship in hospitals: early findings from a systematic review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015; 45:203–12.
    1. Charani E, Castro-Sanchez E, Sevdalis N, et al. . Understanding the determinants of antimicrobial prescribing within hospitals: the role of “prescribing etiquette”. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 57:188–96.
    1. Rawson TM, Charani E, Moore LS, et al. . Mapping the decision pathways of acute infection management in secondary care among UK medical physicians: a qualitative study. BMC Med 2016; 14:208.
    1. Fetterman D. Ethnography: step-by-step. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2010.
    1. Zaman S. Poverty and violence, frustration and inventiveness: hospital ward life in Bangladesh. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59:2025–36.
    1. van der Geest S, Finkler K. Hospital ethnography: introduction. Soc Sci Med 2004; 59:1995–2001.
    1. Charani E, Tarrant C, Moorthy K, Sevdalis N, Brennan L, Holmes AH. Understanding antibiotic decision making in surgery—a qualitative analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2017; 23:752–60.
    1. Hellier C, Tully V, Forrest S, et al. . Improving multidisciplinary communication at ward board rounds using video enhanced reflective practice. BMJ Qual Improv Reports 2015; 4.
    1. Adibi P, Enjavian M, Alizadeh R, Omid A. The effect of ward round teaching on patients: the health team and the patients’ perspectives. J Educ Health Promot 2013; 2:35.
    1. Liu W, Manias E, Gerdtz M. Medication communication during ward rounds on medical wards: power relations and spatial practices. Health (London) 2013; 17:113–34.
    1. Carroll K, Iedema R, Kerridge R. Reshaping ICU ward round practices using video-reflexive ethnography. Qual Health Res 2008; 18:380–90.
    1. Herring R, Desai T, Caldwell G. Quality and safety at the point of care: how long should a ward round take?Clin Med (Lond) 2011; 11:20–2.
    1. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Singh P, Srisatkunam T, Twaij A, Darzi A. Ward simulation to improve surgical ward round performance: a randomized controlled trial of a simulation-based curriculum. Ann Surg 2014; 260:236–43.
    1. Pucher PH, Aggarwal R, Qurashi M, Singh P, Darzi A. Randomized clinical trial of the impact of surgical ward-care checklists on postoperative care in a simulated environment. Br J Surg 2014; 101:1666–73.
    1. Charani E, Kyratsis Y, Lawson W, et al. . An analysis of the development and implementation of a smartphone application for the delivery of antimicrobial prescribing policy: lessons learnt. J Antimicrob Chemother 2013; 68:960–7.
    1. Adair JG. The Hawthorne effect: a reconsideration of the methodological artifact. J Appl Psychol 1984; 69:334–45.
    1. Strauss A, Corbin J.. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: SAGE Publications, 1998.
    1. Glaser B, Strauss A.. The discovery of grounded theory. Hawthorne. NY: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.
    1. Triandis HC. Individualism-collectivism and personality. J Pers 2001; 69:907–24.
    1. Tamma PD, Avdic E, Li DX, Dzintars K, Cosgrove SE. Association of adverse events with antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 11:165–72.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit