Reducing false discoveries in resting-state functional connectivity using short channel correction: an fNIRS study
Ishara Paranawithana, Darren Mao, Yan T Wong, Colette M McKay, Ishara Paranawithana, Darren Mao, Yan T Wong, Colette M McKay
Abstract
Significance: Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a neuroimaging tool that can measure resting-state functional connectivity; however, non-neuronal components present in fNIRS signals introduce false discoveries in connectivity, which can impact interpretation of functional networks. Aim: We investigated the effect of short channel correction on resting-state connectivity by removing non-neuronal signals from fNIRS long channel data. We hypothesized that false discoveries in connectivity can be reduced, hence improving the discriminability of functional networks of known, different connectivity strengths. Approach: A principal component analysis-based short channel correction technique was applied to resting-state data of 10 healthy adult subjects. Connectivity was analyzed using magnitude-squared coherence of channel pairs in connectivity groups of homologous and control brain regions, which are known to differ in connectivity. Results: By removing non-neuronal components using short channel correction, significant reduction of coherence was observed for oxy-hemoglobin concentration changes in frequency bands associated with resting-state connectivity that overlap with the Mayer wave frequencies. The results showed that short channel correction reduced spurious correlations in connectivity measures and improved the discriminability between homologous and control groups. Conclusions: Resting-state functional connectivity analysis with short channel correction performs better than without correction in its ability to distinguish functional networks with distinct connectivity characteristics.
Keywords: functional near-infrared spectroscopy; magnitude-squared coherence; physiological noise removal; principal component analysis; resting-state functional connectivity; short channel correction.
© 2022 The Authors.
Figures
References
- Lu C.-M., et al. , “Use of fNIRS to assess resting state functional connectivity,” J. Neurosci. Methods 186(2), 242–249 (2010).JNMEDT10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.010
- Biswal B., et al. , “Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar MRI,” Magn. Reson. Med. 34(4), 537–541 (1995).MRMEEN10.1002/mrm.1910340409
- McKay C. M., et al. , “Connectivity in language areas of the brain in cochlear implant users as revealed by fNIRS,” Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 894, 327–335 (2016).AEMBAP10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_34
- Bulgarelli C., et al. , “Fronto-temporoparietal connectivity and self-awareness in 18-month-olds: a resting state fNIRS study,” Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 38, 100676 (2019).10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100676
- Bulgarelli C., et al. , “The developmental trajectory of fronto‐temporoparietal connectivity as a proxy of the default mode network: a longitudinal fNIRS investigation,” Hum. Brain Mapp. 41, 2717–2740 (2020).HBRME710.1002/hbm.24974
- Paquette N., et al. , “Developmental patterns of expressive language hemispheric lateralization in children, adolescents and adults using functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Neuropsychologia 68, 117–125 (2015).NUPSA610.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.007
- Molavi B., et al. , “Analyzing the resting state functional connectivity in the human language system using near infrared spectroscopy,” Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 921 (2014).10.3389/fnhum.2013.00921
- Fox M. D., Raichle M. E., “Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8(9), 700–711 (2007).NRNAAN10.1038/nrn2201
- Scholkmann F., et al. , “A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology,” Neuroimage 85, 6–27 (2014).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004
- Pinti P., et al. , “The present and future use of functional near‐infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for cognitive neuroscience,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1464(1), 5–29 (2020).ANYAA910.1111/nyas.13948
- Luke R., et al. , “Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm,” Neurophotonics 8(2), 025008 (2021).10.1117/1.NPh.8.2.025008
- Zhou X., et al. , “Cortical speech processing in postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users, as revealed by functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Trends Hear 22, 2331216518786850 (2018).10.1177/2331216518786850
- Li R., et al. , “Dynamic cortical connectivity alterations associated with Alzheimer’s disease: an EEG and fNIRS integration study,” NeuroImage 21, 101622 (2019).NEIMEF10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101622
- White B. R., et al. , “Resting-state functional connectivity in the human brain revealed with diffuse optical tomography,” NeuroImage 47(1), 148–156 (2009).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.058
- Zhang Y.-J., et al. , “Detecting resting-state functional connectivity in the language system using functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt. 15(4), 047003 (2010).JBOPFO10.1117/1.3462973
- Zhang H., et al. , “Functional connectivity as revealed by independent component analysis of resting-state fNIRS measurements,” NeuroImage 51(3), 1150–1161 (2010).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.080
- Homae F., et al. , “Development of global cortical networks in early infancy,” J. Neurosci. 30(14), 4877–4882 (2010).JNRSDS10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5618-09.2010
- Tachtsidis I., Scholkmann F., “False positives and false negatives in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: issues, challenges, and the way forward,” Neurophotonics 3(3), 031405 (2016).10.1117/1.NPh.3.3.031405
- Santosa H., et al. , “Characterization and correction of the false-discovery rates in resting state connectivity using functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” J. Biomed. Opt. 22(5), 055002 (2017).JBOPFO10.1117/1.JBO.22.5.055002
- Santosa H., et al. , “Noise reduction in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals by independent component analysis,” Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84(7), 073106 (2013).RSINAK10.1063/1.4812785
- Zhang Y., Sun J., Rolfe P., “RLS adaptive filtering for physiological interference reduction in NIRS brain activity measurement: a Monte Carlo study,” Physiol. Meas. 33(6), 925 (2012).PMEAE310.1088/0967-3334/33/6/925
- Kirilina E., et al. , “Identifying and quantifying main components of physiological noise in functional near infrared spectroscopy on the prefrontal cortex,” Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 864 (2013).10.3389/fnhum.2013.00864
- Zhou X., et al. , “Comparing fNIRS signal qualities between approaches with and without short channels,” PLoS One 15(12), e0244186 (2020).POLNCL10.1371/journal.pone.0244186
- Santosa H., et al. , “Quantitative comparison of correction techniques for removing systemic physiological signal in functional near-infrared spectroscopy studies,” Neurophotonics 7(3), 035009 (2020).10.1117/1.NPh.7.3.035009
- Sato T., et al. , “Reduction of global interference of scalp-hemodynamics in functional near-infrared spectroscopy using short distance probes,” NeuroImage 141, 120–132 (2016).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.054
- Zhang Q., Brown E., Strangman G., “Adaptive filtering to reduce global interference in evoked brain activity detection: a human subject case study,” J. Biomed. Opt. 12(6), 064009 (2007).JBOPFO10.1117/1.2804706
- Yamada T., Umeyama S., Matsuda K., “Separation of fNIRS signals into functional and systemic components based on differences in hemodynamic modalities,” PLoS One 7(11), e50271 (2012).POLNCL10.1371/journal.pone.0050271
- Virtanen J., Noponen T. E., Meriläinen P., “Comparison of principal and independent component analysis in removing extracerebral interference from near-infrared spectroscopy signals,” J. Biomed. Opt. 14(5), 054032 (2009).JBOPFO10.1117/1.3253323
- Sakakibara E., et al. , “Detection of resting state functional connectivity using partial correlation analysis: a study using multi-distance and whole-head probe near-infrared spectroscopy,” Neuroimage 142, 590–601 (2016).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.011
- Funane T., et al. , “Quantitative evaluation of deep and shallow tissue layers’ contribution to fNIRS signal using multi-distance optodes and independent component analysis,” Neuroimage 85, 150–165 (2014).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.026
- Santosa H., et al. , “The NIRS Brain AnalyzIR toolbox,” Algorithms 11(5), 73 (2018).10.3390/a11050073
- Pollonini L., Bortfeld H., Oghalai J. S., “PHOEBE: a method for real time mapping of optodes-scalp coupling in functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Biomed. Opt. Express 7(12), 5104–5119 (2016).BOEICL10.1364/BOE.7.005104
- Fishburn F. A., et al. , “Temporal derivative distribution repair (TDDR): a motion correction method for fNIRS,” NeuroImage 184 171–179 (2019).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.025
- Molavi B., Dumont G. A., “Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy,” Physiol. Meas. 33(2), 259 (2012).PMEAE310.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259
- Delpy D. T., et al. , “Estimation of optical pathlength through tissue from direct time of flight measurement,” Phys. Med. Biol. 33(12), 1433 (1988).PHMBA710.1088/0031-9155/33/12/008
- Sasai S., et al. , “Frequency-specific functional connectivity in the brain during resting state revealed by NIRS,” NeuroImage 56(1), 252–257 (2011).NEIMEF10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.075
- Zhang X., Noah J. A., Hirsch J., “Separation of the global and local components in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals using principal component spatial filtering,” Neurophotonics 3(1), 015004 (2016).10.1117/1.NPh.3.1.015004
- Noah J. A., et al. , “Comparison of short-channel separation and spatial domain filtering for removal of non-neural components in functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals,” Neurophotonics 8(1), 015004 (2021).10.1117/1.NPh.8.1.015004
- Hoshi Y., “Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: current status and future prospects,” J. Biomed. Opt. 12(6), 062106 (2007).10.1117/1.2804911
- Luke R., Shader M. J., McAlpine D., “Characterization of Mayer-wave oscillations in functional near-infrared spectroscopy using a physiologically informed model of the neural power spectra,” Neurophotonics 8(4), 041001 (2021).10.1117/1.NPh.8.4.041001
Source: PubMed