Assessment of Mandibular Movement Monitoring With Machine Learning Analysis for the Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Jean-Louis Pépin, Clément Letesson, Nhat Nam Le-Dong, Antoine Dedave, Stéphane Denison, Valérie Cuthbert, Jean-Benoît Martinot, David Gozal, Jean-Louis Pépin, Clément Letesson, Nhat Nam Le-Dong, Antoine Dedave, Stéphane Denison, Valérie Cuthbert, Jean-Benoît Martinot, David Gozal

Abstract

Importance: Given the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there is a need for simpler and automated diagnostic approaches.

Objective: To evaluate whether mandibular movement (MM) monitoring during sleep coupled with an automated analysis by machine learning is appropriate for OSA diagnosis.

Design, setting, and participants: Diagnostic study of adults undergoing overnight in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) as the reference method compared with simultaneous MM monitoring at a sleep clinic in an academic institution (Sleep Laboratory, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Université Catholique de Louvain Namur Site Sainte-Elisabeth, Namur, Belgium). Patients with suspected OSA were enrolled from July 5, 2017, to October 31, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis required either evoking signs or symptoms or related medical or psychiatric comorbidities coupled with a PSG-derived respiratory disturbance index (PSG-RDI) of at least 5 events/h. A PSG-RDI of at least 15 events/h satisfied the diagnosis criteria even in the absence of associated symptoms or comorbidities. Patients who did not meet these criteria were classified as not having OSA. Agreement analysis and diagnostic performance were assessed by Bland-Altman plot comparing PSG-RDI and the Sunrise system RDI (Sr-RDI) with diagnosis threshold optimization via receiver operating characteristic curves, allowing for evaluation of the device sensitivity and specificity in detecting OSA at 5 events/h and 15 events/h.

Results: Among 376 consecutive adults with suspected OSA, the mean (SD) age was 49.7 (13.2) years, the mean (SD) body mass index was 31.0 (7.1), and 207 (55.1%) were men. Reliable agreement was found between PSG-RDI and Sr-RDI in patients without OSA (n = 46; mean difference, 1.31; 95% CI, -1.05 to 3.66 events/h) and in patients with OSA with a PSG-RDI of at least 5 events/h with symptoms (n = 107; mean difference, -0.69; 95% CI, -3.77 to 2.38 events/h). An Sr-RDI underestimation of -11.74 (95% CI, -20.83 to -2.67) events/h in patients with OSA with a PSG-RDI of at least 15 events/h was detected and corrected by optimization of the Sunrise system diagnostic threshold. The Sr-RDI showed diagnostic capability, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.93) for corresponding PSG-RDIs of 5 events/h and 15 events/h, respectively. At the 2 optimal cutoffs of 7.63 events/h and 12.65 events/h, Sr-RDI had accuracy of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90-0.94) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.86-0.90) as well as posttest probabilities of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.99-0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91) at PSG-RDIs of at least 5 events/h and at least 15 events/h, respectively, corresponding to positive likelihood ratios of 14.86 (95% CI, 9.86-30.12) and 5.63 (95% CI, 4.92-7.27), respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: Automatic analysis of MM patterns provided reliable performance in RDI calculation. The use of this index in OSA diagnosis appears to be promising.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Pépin reported being a scientific advisor to Sunrise; receiving grants and/or personal fees from ResMed, Philips, Fisher & Paykel, Sefam, AstraZeneca, AGIR à dom, Elevie, VitalAire, Boehringer Ingelheim, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Itamar Medical Ltd; and receiving research support for clinical studies from Mutualia and Air Liquide Foundation. Dr Letesson and Messrs Dedave and Denison reported receiving personal fees from Sunrise. Dr Martinot reported being a nonremunerated scientific advisor to Sunrise and being a remunerated investigator in pharmacy trials for Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Theranexus. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of the Study…
Figure 1.. Flow Diagram of the Study Protocol
Shown is a comparison between polysomnography (PSG) and automated mandibular movement (MM) analysis procedures. Data concomitantly recorded by in-laboratory PSG and the Sunrise system device were analyzed independently. A, The PSG data were manually scored to export a respiratory disturbance index (PSG-RDI) as the reference method for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis. B, The Sunrise system (Sr) data were automatically uploaded into a cloud-based platform without human intervention, where data were handled by a proprietary machine learning algorithm. After algorithm processing, Sr-RDI was automatically derived for agreement analysis and evaluation of diagnosis performance. ArI indicates arousal index; TST, total sleep time.
Figure 2.. Evaluation of the Agreement Between…
Figure 2.. Evaluation of the Agreement Between the 2 Methods of Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) Measurement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) Diagnosis
The reference method of overnight in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) is shown on the x-axis. A, Kernel density estimation plot shows the distribution of PSG-derived RDI (PSG-RDI) (discontinued trace) vs the Sunrise system RDI (Sr-RDI) (continuous trace) in the 3 clinical groups. B, Conventional Bland-Altman plot shows the disagreement between PSG-RDI and Sr-RDI (y-axis) as a function of PSG-RDI (x-axis), with individual cases stratified into 3 clinical groups. The horizontal lines indicate the mean difference in the whole sample and within each group. The 2 dashed lines indicate the lower and upper levels (mean, ±1.96 SD) of the disagreement in the whole sample. Bidimensional kernel density estimation plots are superposed to show the distribution of the disagreement as a function of PSG-RDI. The distribution of the disagreement between the 2 methods, stratified by group, is shown on the right.
Figure 3.. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis…
Figure 3.. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis for Evaluating the Performance of the Sunrise System Respiratory Disturbance Index (Sr-RDI) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Diagnosis
Shown are curves of the binary classification rules to detect patients with obstructive sleep apnea with polysomnography-derived respiratory disturbance index (PSG-RDI) of at least 5 events/h (A) and at least 15 events/h (B) using Sr-RDI. The 95% CIs of the area under the curve (AUC) and smoothing effect were obtained by bootstrapping. The diagonal dotted line serves as a reference and shows the performance if obstructive sleep apnea detection was made randomly.

References

    1. Benjafield AV, Ayas NT, Eastwood PR, et al. . Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):-. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5
    1. Rosenzweig I, Glasser M, Polsek D, Leschziner GD, Williams SCR, Morrell MJ. Sleep apnoea and the brain: a complex relationship. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(5):404-414. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00090-9
    1. Mulgrew AT, Ryan CF, Fleetham JA, et al. . The impact of obstructive sleep apnea and daytime sleepiness on work limitation. Sleep Med. 2007;9(1):42-53. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2007.01.009
    1. Bjornsdottir E, Keenan BT, Eysteinsdottir B, et al. . Quality of life among untreated sleep apnea patients compared with the general population and changes after treatment with positive airway pressure. J Sleep Res. 2015;24(3):328-338. doi:10.1111/jsr.12262
    1. Gottlieb DJ, Ellenbogen JM, Bianchi MT, Czeisler CA. Sleep deficiency and motor vehicle crash risk in the general population: a prospective cohort study. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):44. doi:10.1186/s12916-018-1025-7
    1. Drager LF, McEvoy RD, Barbe F, Lorenzi-Filho G, Redline S; INCOSACT Initiative (International Collaboration of Sleep Apnea Cardiovascular Trialists) . Sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease: lessons from recent trials and need for team science. Circulation. 2017;136(19):1840-1850. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029400
    1. Hoyos CM, Drager LF, Patel SR. OSA and cardiometabolic risk: what’s the bottom line? Respirology. 2017;22(3):420-429. doi:10.1111/resp.12984
    1. Javaheri S, Barbe F, Campos-Rodriguez F, et al. . Sleep apnea: types, mechanisms, and clinical cardiovascular consequences. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(7):841-858. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.11.069
    1. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, Agusti AGN. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1046-1053. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71141-7
    1. Craig SE, Kohler M, Nicoll D, et al. . Continuous positive airway pressure improves sleepiness but not calculated vascular risk in patients with minimally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea: the MOSAIC randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2012;67(12):1090-1096. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202178
    1. Yu J, Zhou Z, McEvoy RD, et al. . Association of positive airway pressure with cardiovascular events and death in adults with sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2017;318(2):156-166. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.7967
    1. Sia CH, Hong Y, Tan LWL, van Dam RM, Lee CH, Tan A. Awareness and knowledge of obstructive sleep apnea among the general population. Sleep Med. 2017;36:10-17. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.03.030
    1. Peppard PE, Hagen EW. The last 25 years of obstructive sleep apnea epidemiology—and the next 25? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(3):310-312. doi:10.1164/rccm.201708-1614PP
    1. Tarraubella N, Sánchez-de-la-Torre M, Nadal N, et al. . Management of obstructive sleep apnoea in a primary care vs sleep unit setting: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2018;73(12):1152-1160. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211237
    1. Abrahamyan L, Sahakyan Y, Chung S, et al. . Diagnostic accuracy of level IV portable sleep monitors versus polysomnography for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Breath. 2018;22(3):593-611. doi:10.1007/s11325-017-1615-1
    1. Uddin MB, Chow CM, Su SW. Classification methods to detect sleep apnea in adults based on respiratory and oximetry signals: a systematic review. Physiol Meas. 2018;39(3):03TR01. doi:10.1088/1361-6579/aaafb8
    1. Muto V, Berthomier C, Schmidt C, et al. . Inter- and intra-expert variability in sleep scoring: comparison between visual and automatic analysis [abstract 0315]. Sleep. 2018;41(suppl 1):A121. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.314
    1. Stöberl AS, Schwarz EI, Haile SR, et al. . Night-to-night variability of obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep Res. 2017;26(6):782-788. doi:10.1111/jsr.12558
    1. Randerath W, Bassetti CL, Bonsignore MR, et al. . Challenges and perspectives in obstructive sleep apnoea: report by an ad hoc working group of the Sleep Disordered Breathing Group of the European Respiratory Society and the European Sleep Research Society. Eur Respir J. 2018;52(3):1702616. doi:10.1183/13993003.02616-2017
    1. Gray EL, Barnes DJ. Beyond the thermistor: novel technology for the ambulatory diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea. Respirology. 2017;22(3):418-419. doi:10.1111/resp.13004
    1. Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future—big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216-1219. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1606181
    1. Bragazzi NL, Guglielmi O, Garbarino S. SleepOMICS: how big data can revolutionize sleep science. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(2):E291. doi:10.3390/ijerph16020291
    1. Alvarez-Estevez D, Moret-Bonillo V. Computer-assisted diagnosis of the sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome: a review. Sleep Disord. 2015;2015:237878. doi:10.1155/2015/237878
    1. Martinot JB, Le-Dong NN, Cuthbert V, et al. . Mandibular movements as accurate reporters of respiratory effort during sleep: validation against diaphragmatic electromyography. Front Neurol. 2017;8:353. doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00353
    1. Senny F, Destiné J, Poirrier R. Midsagittal jaw movements as a sleep/wake marker. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2009;56(2):303-309. doi:10.1109/TBME.2008.2003264
    1. Senny F, Maury G, Cambron L, Leroux A, Destiné J, Poirrier R. The sleep/wake state scoring from mandible movement signal. Sleep Breath. 2012;16(2):535-542. doi:10.1007/s11325-011-0539-4
    1. Martinot JB, Borel JC, Cuthbert V, et al. . Mandibular position and movements: suitability for diagnosis of sleep apnoea. Respirology. 2017;22(3):567-574. doi:10.1111/resp.12929
    1. Berry RB, Budhiraja R, Gottlieb DJ, et al. ; American Academy of Sleep Medicine; Deliberations of the Sleep Apnea Definitions Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine . Rules for scoring respiratory events in sleep: update of the 2007 AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012;8(5):597-619. doi:10.5664/jcsm.2172
    1. Berry RB, Brooks R, Gamaldo C, et al. . AASM Scoring Manual updates for 2017 (version 2.4). J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(5):665-666. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6576
    1. American Academy of Sleep Medicine . International Classification of Sleep Disorders. 3rd ed. Darien, IL: American Academy of Sleep Medicine; 2014.
    1. Sateia MJ. International Classification of Sleep Disorders–third edition: highlights and modifications. Chest. 2014;146(5):1387-1394. doi:10.1378/chest.14-0970
    1. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Project for Statistical Computing; 2017.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
    1. Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. Int J Biostat. 2008;4(1):16. doi:10.2202/1557-4679.1107
    1. Collop NA, Anderson WM, Boehlecke B, et al. ; Portable Monitoring Task Force of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine . Clinical guidelines for the use of unattended portable monitors in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in adult patients. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(7):737-747.
    1. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. ; US Preventive Services Task Force . Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2017;317(4):407-414. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.20325
    1. Collop N. Breathing related arousals: call them what you want, but please count them. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(2):125-126. doi:10.5664/jcsm.3434
    1. Tsai WH, Flemons WW, Whitelaw WA, Remmers JE. A comparison of apnea-hypopnea indices derived from different definitions of hypopnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):43-48. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9709017
    1. Bianchi MT, Goparaju B. Potential underestimation of sleep apnea severity by at-home kits: rescoring in-laboratory polysomnography without sleep staging. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(4):551-555. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6540
    1. Setty AR. Underestimation of sleep apnea with home sleep apnea testing compared to in-laboratory sleep testing. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(4):531-532. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6534
    1. Collop NA, Tracy SL, Kapur V, et al. . Obstructive sleep apnea devices for out-of-center (OOC) testing: technology evaluation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2011;7(5):531-548. doi:10.5664/jcsm.1328
    1. Mendonça F, Mostafa SS, Ravelo-García AG, Morgado-Dias F, Penzel T. Devices for home detection of obstructive sleep apnea: a review. Sleep Med Rev. 2018;41:149-160. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2018.02.004
    1. Rétory Y, David P, de Picciotto C, Niedzialkowski P, Bonay M, Petitjean M. Validity of thoracic respiratory inductive plethysmography in high body mass index subjects. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2017;242:52-58. doi:10.1016/j.resp.2017.03.009
    1. Ghamari M, Castaneda D, Esparza A, Soltanpur C, Nazeran H. A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;4(4). doi:10.15406/ijbsbe.2018.04.00125
    1. Senaratna CV, Perret JL, Matheson MC, et al. . Validity of the Berlin questionnaire in detecting obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2017;36:116-124. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2017.04.001
    1. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44-56. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
    1. Xu Z, Gutiérrez-Tobal GC, Wu Y, et al. . Cloud algorithm–driven oximetry-based diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea in symptomatic habitually snoring children. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(2):1801788. doi:10.1183/13993003.01788-2018
    1. Hornero R, Kheirandish-Gozal L, Gutiérrez-Tobal GC, et al. . Nocturnal oximetry–based evaluation of habitually snoring children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(12):1591-1598. doi:10.1164/rccm.201705-0930OC
    1. Veauthier C, Piper SK, Gaede G, Penzel T, Paul F. The first night effect in multiple sclerosis patients undergoing home-based polysomnography. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:337-344. doi:10.2147/NSS.S176201

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit