Is Plantar Loading Altered During Repeated Sprints on Artificial Turf in International Football Players?

Olivier Girard, Grégoire P Millet, Athol Thomson, Franck Brocherie, Olivier Girard, Grégoire P Millet, Athol Thomson, Franck Brocherie

Abstract

We compared fatigue-induced changes in plantar loading during the repeated anaerobic sprint test over two distinct distance intervals. Twelve international male football outfield players (Qatar Football Association) completed 6 × 35-m sprints (10 s of active recovery) on artificial turf with their football boots. Insole plantar pressure distribution was continuously recorded and values (whole foot and under 9 foot zones) subsequently averaged and compared over two distinct distance intervals (0-17.5 m vs. 17.5-35 m). Sprint times increased (p <0.001) from the first (4.87 ± 0.13 s) to the last (5.63 ± 0.31 s) repetition, independently of the distance interval. Contact area (150 ± 23 vs. 158 ± 19 cm2; -5.8 ± 9.1%; p = 0.032), maximum force (1910 ± 559 vs. 2211 ± 613 N; -16.9 ± 18.2%; p = 0.005) and mean pressure (154 ± 41 vs. 172 ± 37 kPa; -13.9 ± 19.0%; p = 0.033) for the whole foot were lower at 0-17.5 m vs. 17.5-35 m, irrespectively of sprint number. There were no main effects of sprint number or any significant interactions for any plantar variables of the whole foot. The distance interval × sprint number × foot region interaction on relative loads was not significant. Neither distance interval nor fatigue modified plantar pressure distribution patterns. Fatigue led to a decrement in sprint time but no significant change in plantar pressure distribution patterns across sprint repetitions.

Keywords: Repeated-sprint ability; distance interval; plantar loading; pressure distribution patterns; team sports.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Changes in sprint times over the six repetitions of the repeated-sprint anaerobic sprint test. Data at the 0–17.5 m (white) and 17.5–35 m (black) distance intervals (acceleration and terminal phases, respectively) are presented. Values are mean ± SEM. * significantly (P < 0.05) different between the two intervals. # significantly (P < 0.05) different from sprint number 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Plantar loading parameters for the whole foot over sprint repetitions at the 0–17.5 m (white bars) and 17.5–35 m (black bars) distance intervals (acceleration and terminal phases, respectively). Values are mean ± SEM. * significantly (p <0.05) different between the two intervals.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relative load for each foot region over sprint repetitions at the 0–17.5 m (top panel) and 17.5–35 m (bottom panel) distance intervals (acceleration and terminal phases, respectively). Values are mean ± SEM. Note that for improved clarity post hoc results for main effect of foot region are not displayed.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit