Chromosomal Region 11p14.1 is Associated with Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Bisoprolol

Vanessa Fontana, Richard Myles Turner, Ben Francis, Peng Yin, Benno Pütz, Timo P Hiltunen, Sanni Ruotsalainen, Kimmo K Kontula, Bertam Müller-Myhsok, Munir Pirmohamed, Vanessa Fontana, Richard Myles Turner, Ben Francis, Peng Yin, Benno Pütz, Timo P Hiltunen, Sanni Ruotsalainen, Kimmo K Kontula, Bertam Müller-Myhsok, Munir Pirmohamed

Abstract

Purpose: Bisoprolol is a widely used beta-blocker in patients with cardiovascular diseases. As with other beta-blockers, there is variability in response to bisoprolol, but the underlying reasons for this have not been clearly elucidated. Our aim was to investigate genetic factors that affect bisoprolol pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and potentially the clinical outcomes.

Patients and methods: Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome were recruited prospectively on admission to hospital and followed up for up to 2 years. Patients from this cohort who were on treatment with bisoprolol, at any dose, had bisoprolol adherence data and a plasma sample, one month after discharge from index hospitalisation were included in the study. Individual bisoprolol clearance values were estimated using population pharmacokinetic modeling. Genome-wide association analysis after genotyping was undertaken using an Illumina HumanOmniExpressExome-8 v1.0 BeadChip array, while CYP2D6 copy number variations were determined by PCR techniques and phenotypes for CYP2D6 and CYP3A were inferred from the genotype. GWAS significant SNPs were analysed for heart rate response to bisoprolol in an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects.

Results: Six hundred twenty-two patients on bisoprolol underwent both PK and genome wide analysis. The mean (IQR) of the estimated clearance in this population was 13.6 (10.0-18.0) L/h. Bisoprolol clearance was associated with rs11029955 (p=7.17×10-9) mapped to the region of coiled-coil domain containing 34 region (CCDC34) on chromosome 11, and with rs116702638 (p=2.54×10-8). Each copy of the minor allele of rs11029955 was associated with 2.2 L/h increase in clearance. In an independent cohort of hypertensive subjects, rs11029955 was associated with 24-hour heart rate response to 4-week treatment with bisoprolol (p= 9.3×10-5), but not with rs116702638.

Conclusion: A novel locus on the chromosomal region 11p14.1 was associated with bisoprolol clearance in a real-world cohort of patients and was validated in independent cohort with a pharmacodynamic association.

Keywords: bisoprolol; genome-wide association; pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

MP has received partnership funding for the following: MRC Clinical Pharmacology Training Scheme (co-funded by MRC and Roche, UCB, Eli Lilly and Novartis); a PhD studentship jointly funded by EPSRC and Astra Zeneca; and grant funding from Vistagen Therapeutics. He also has unrestricted educational grant support for the UK Pharmacogenetics and Stratified Medicine Network from Bristol-Myers Squibb. He has developed an HLA genotyping panel with MC Diagnostics, but does not benefit financially from this. He is part of the IMI Consortium ARDAT (www.ardat.org). None of the funding MP received is related to the current paper. RMT reports grants from MRC and Health Education England Genomics Education Programme during the conduct of the study. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of HEE GEP. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

© 2022 Fontana et al.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Manhattan plot of bisoprolol clearance in patients with acute coronary syndrome. The red line represents the genome-wide significance p value threshold (5x10−8) and blue lines represents the nominal significance threshold (1x10−5).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Regional association plot for bisoprolol clearance at the CCDC34 locus (A), LONRF2 (B), CYP2D6 (C), and CYP3A (D). The colours reflect linkage disequilibrium (r2) for the signals with the lowest p values.

References

    1. Yusuf S, Wittes J, Friedman L. Overview of results of randomized clinical trials in heart disease. I. Treatments following myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1988;260(14):2088–2093. doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410140100032
    1. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37(3):267–315. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320
    1. Leopold G, Pabst J, Ungethum W, Buhring KU. Basic pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol, a new highly beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist. J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;26(8):616–621. doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1986.tb02959.x
    1. Rau T, Wuttke H, Michels LM, et al. Impact of the CYP2D6 genotype on the clinical effects of metoprolol: a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(3):269–272. doi:10.1038/clpt.2008.218
    1. van der Wouden CH, Cambon-Thomsen A, Cecchin E, et al. Implementing Pharmacogenomics in Europe: design and Implementation Strategy of the Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics Consortium. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(3):341–358. doi:10.1002/cpt.602
    1. Turner RM, Yin P, Hanson A, et al. Investigating the prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of suboptimal statin use early after a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Clin Lipidol. 2017;11(1):204–214. doi:10.1016/j.jacl.2016.12.007
    1. Turner RM, Fontana V, Bayliss M, Whalley S, Santoyo Castelazo A, Pirmohamed M. Development, validation and application of a novel HPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of atorvastatin, bisoprolol and clopidogrel in a large cardiovascular patient cohort. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;159:272–281. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2018.06.062
    1. Hiltunen TP, Donner KM, Sarin AP, et al. Pharmacogenomics of hypertension: a genome-wide, placebo-controlled cross-over study, using four classes of antihypertensive drugs. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(1):e001521. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001521
    1. Svarstad BL, Chewning BA, Sleath BL, Claesson C. The Brief Medication Questionnaire: a tool for screening patient adherence and barriers to adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37(2):113–124. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00107-4
    1. Garren ST. jmuOutlier: Permutation Tests for Nonparametric Statistics. 2018. Available from: . Accessed March 19, 2022.
    1. Cvan Trobec K, Grabnar I, Kerec Kos M, et al. Bisoprolol pharmacokinetics and body composition in patients with chronic heart failure: a longitudinal study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72(7):813–822. doi:10.1007/s00228-016-2041-1
    1. Neely MN, van Guilder MG, Yamada WM, Schumitzky A, Jelliffe RW. Accurate detection of outliers and subpopulations with Pmetrics, a nonparametric and parametric pharmacometric modeling and simulation package for R. Ther Drug Monit. 2012;34(4):467–476. doi:10.1097/FTD.0b013e31825c4ba6
    1. Delaneau O, Marchini J, Zagury JF. A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes. Nat Methods. 2011;9(2):179–181. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1785
    1. Genomes Project C, Auton A, Brooks LD, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. doi:10.1038/nature15393
    1. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(6):e1000529. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000529
    1. Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(18):2336–2337. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq419
    1. Caudle KE, Sangkuhl K, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. Standardizing CYP2D6 Genotype to Phenotype Translation: consensus Recommendations from the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group. Clin Transl Sci. 2020;13(1):116–124. doi:10.1111/cts.12692
    1. Elens L, van Gelder T, Hesselink DA, Haufroid V, van Schaik RH. CYP3A4*22: promising newly identified CYP3A4 variant allele for personalizing pharmacotherapy. Pharmacogenomics. 2013;14(1):47–62. doi:10.2217/pgs.12.187
    1. Birdwell KA, Decker B, Barbarino JM, et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines for CYP3A5 Genotype and Tacrolimus Dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015;98(1):19–24. doi:10.1002/cpt.113
    1. Sanchez Spitman AB, Moes D, Gelderblom H, Dezentje VO, Swen JJ, Guchelaar HJ. Effect of CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, and CYP3A combined genotypes on tamoxifen metabolism. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(12):1589–1598. doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2323-2
    1. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7. doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8
    1. Castano-Amores C, Diaz-Villamarin X, Perez-Gutierrez AM, et al. Pharmacogenetic polymorphisms affecting bisoprolol response. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;142:112069. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112069
    1. Momcilovic S, Milovanovic JR, Jankovic SM, et al. Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Bisoprolol in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2019;73(3):136–142. doi:10.1097/FJC.0000000000000644
    1. Luzier AB, Killian A, Wilton JH, Wilson MF, Forrest A, Kazierad DJ. Gender-related effects on metoprolol pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;66(6):594–601. doi:10.1053/cp.1999.v66.103400001
    1. Taguchi M, Nozawa T, Igawa A, et al. Pharmacokinetic variability of routinely administered bisoprolol in middle-aged and elderly Japanese patients. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28(5):876–881. doi:10.1248/bpb.28.876
    1. Jankovic SM. Pharmacokinetics of selective beta1-adrenergic blocking agents: prescribing implications. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2014;10(9):1221–1229. doi:10.1517/17425255.2014.937702
    1. Horikiri Y, Suzuki T, Mizobe M. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of bisoprolol enantiomers in humans. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87(3):289–294. doi:10.1021/js970316d
    1. Nozawa T, Taguchi M, Tahara K, et al. Influence of CYP2D6 genotype on metoprolol plasma concentration and beta-adrenergic inhibition during long-term treatment: a comparison with bisoprolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2005;46(5):713–720. doi:10.1097/01.fjc.0000184117.76188.68
    1. Gong Y, Qiu W, Ning X, et al. CCDC34 is up-regulated in bladder cancer and regulates bladder cancer cell proliferation, apoptosis and migration. Oncotarget. 2015;6(28):25856–25867. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4624
    1. Geng W, Liang W, Fan Y, Ye Z, Zhang L. Overexpression of CCDC34 in colorectal cancer and its involvement in tumor growth, apoptosis and invasion. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(1):465–473. doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.7860
    1. Boyle AP, Hong EL, Hariharan M, et al. Annotation of functional variation in personal genomes using RegulomeDB. Genome Res. 2012;22(9):1790–1797. doi:10.1101/gr.137323.112
    1. MacArthur J, Bowler E, Cerezo M, et al. The new NHGRI-EBI Catalog of published genome-wide association studies (GWAS Catalog). Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D896–D901. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1133
    1. Fagerberg L, Hallstrom BM, Oksvold P, et al. Analysis of the human tissue-specific expression by genome-wide integration of transcriptomics and antibody-based proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(2):397–406. doi:10.1074/mcp.M113.035600
    1. Singh S, Warren HR, Hiltunen TP, et al. Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Blood Pressure Response to beta1-Blockers: results From ICAPS (International Consortium of Antihypertensive Pharmacogenomics Studies). J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(16):e013115. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.013115
    1. Choi L, Crainiceanu CM, Caffo BS. Practical recommendations for population PK studies with sampling time errors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(12):2055–2064. doi:10.1007/s00228-013-1576-7

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit