The effectiveness of intervention with board games: a systematic review

Shota Noda, Kentaro Shirotsuki, Mutsuhiro Nakao, Shota Noda, Kentaro Shirotsuki, Mutsuhiro Nakao

Abstract

To examine the effectiveness of board games and programs that use board games, the present study conducted a systematic review using the PsycINFO and PubMed databases with the keywords "board game" AND "trial;" in total, 71 studies were identified. Of these 71 studies, 27 satisfied the inclusion criteria in terms of program content, intervention style, and pre-post comparisons and were subsequently reviewed. These 27 studies were divided into the following three categories regarding the effects of board games and programs that use board games: educational knowledge (11 articles), cognitive functions (11 articles), and other conditions (five articles). The effect sizes between pre- and post-tests or pre-tests and follow-up tests were 0.12-1.81 for educational knowledge, 0.04-2.60 and - 1.14 - - 0.02 for cognitive functions, 0.06-0.65 for physical activity, and - 0.87 - - 0.61 for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The present findings showed that, as a tool, board games can be expected to improve the understanding of knowledge, enhance interpersonal interactions among participants, and increase the motivation of participants. However, because the number of published studies in this area remains limited, the possibility of using board games as treatment for clinical symptoms requires further discussion.

Keywords: Board game; Cognitive function; Education; Systematic review.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© The Author(s). 2019.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow chart of the study selection process

References

    1. El Daou BMN, El-Shamieh SI. The effect of playing chess on the concentration of ADHD students in the 2nd cycle. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;192:638–643. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.111.
    1. Charness N. The impact of chess research on cognitive science. Psycho Res. 1992;54:4–9. doi: 10.1007/BF01359217.
    1. Burgoyne AP, Sala G, Gobet F, Macnamara BN, Campitella G, Hambrick DZ. The relationship between cognitive ability and chess skill: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Intelligence. 2016;59:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2016.08.002.
    1. Sala G, Gobet F. Do the benefits of chess instruction transfer to academic and cognitive skill?: a meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2016;18:46–57. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2016.02.002.
    1. American Go Association. What is Go? American Go Association. Retrieved from (January 22, 2019).
    1. Iizuka A, Suzuki H, Ogawa S, Kobayashi-Cuya KE, Kobayashi M, Fujiwara Y. Pilot randomized controlled trail of the GO game intervention on cognitive function. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2018;33(3):192–198. doi: 10.1177/1533317517753362.
    1. Kim SH, Han DH, Lee YS, Kim BN, Cheong JH, Han SH. Baduk (the game of go) improved cognitive function and brain activity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatry Investig. 2014;11(2):143–151. doi: 10.4306/pi.2014.11.2.143.
    1. Lin Q, Cao Y, Gao J. The impacts of a GO-game (Chinese chess) intervention on Alzheimer disease in a northeast Chinese population. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:163. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00163.
    1. Wan X, Takano D, Asamizuya T, Suzuki C, Ueno K, Cheng K, Ito T, Tanaka K. Developing intuition: neural correlates of cognitive-skill learning in caudate nucleus. J Neurosci. 2012;32:17492–17501. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2312-12.2012.
    1. Amaro S, Viggiano A, Di Costanzo A, Madeo I, Viggiano A, Baccari ME, Marchitelli E, Raia M, Viggiano E, Deepak S, Monda M, De Luca B. Kalèdo, a new educational board-game, gives nutritional rudiments and encourages healthy eating in children: a pilot cluster randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2006;165(9):630–635. doi: 10.1007/s00431-006-0153-9.
    1. Zeedyk MS, Wallace L, Carcary B, Jones K, Larter K. Children and road safety: increasing knowledge does not improve behavior. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001;71:573–594. doi: 10.1348/000709901158686.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates: Hillsdale; 1988.
    1. Sala G, Aksayli ND, Tatlidil KS, Gondo Y, Gobet F. Working Memory training does not enhance older adults’ cognitive skills: a comprehensive meta-analysis. from file:///C:/Users/noras/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bbwe/TempState/Downloads/WMT_older_adults_posting_version%20(1).pdf (July 22, 2019).
    1. Khazaal Y, Chatton A, Prezzemolo R, Zebouni F, Edel Y, Jacquet J, Ruggeri O, Burnens E, Monney G, Protti AS, Etter JF, Khan R, Cornuz J, Zullino D. Impact of a board-game approach on current smokers: a randomized controlled trial. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2013;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-8-3.
    1. Wanyama JN, Castelnuovo B, Robertson G, Newell K, Sempa JB, Kambugu A, Manabe YC, Colebunders R. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a board game on patients' knowledge uptake of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases at the infectious diseases institute, Kampala, Uganda. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(3):253–258. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824373d5.
    1. Nieh HP, Wu WC. Effects of a collaborative board game on bullying intervention: a group-randomized controlled trial. J Sch Health. 2018;88(10):725–733. doi: 10.1111/josh.12675.
    1. Martins FDP, Leal LP, Linhares FMP, Santos AHDS, Leite GO, Pontes CM. Effect of the board game as educational technology on schoolchildren’s knowledge on breastfeeding. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018;26:e3049.
    1. Viggiano E, Viggiano A, Di Costanzo A, Viggiano A, Viggiano A, Andreozzi E, Romano V, Vicidomini C, Di Tuoro D, Gargano G, Incarnato L, Fevola C, Volta P, Tolomeo C, Scianni G, Santangelo C, Battista R, Raia M, Valentino I, Palumbo M, Messina A, Monda M, De Luca B, Amare S. Healthy lifestyle promotion in primary schools through the board game Kaledo: a pilot cluster randomized trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(9):1371–1375. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3091-4.
    1. Karbownik MS, Wiktorowska-Owczarek A, Kowalczyk E, Kwarta P, Mokros Ł, Pietras T. Board game versus lecture-based seminar in the teaching of pharmacology of antimicrobial drugs–a randomized controlled trial. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363(7):fnw045. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw045.
    1. Viggiano A, Viggiano E, Di Costanzo A, Viggiano A, Andreozzi E, Romano V, Rianna I, Vicidomini C, Gargano G, Incarnato L, Fevola C, Volta P, Tolomeo C, Scianni G, Santangelo C, Battista R, Monda M, Viggiano A, De Luca B, Amaro S. Kaledo, a board game for nutrition education of children and adolescents at school: cluster randomized controlled trial of healthy lifestyle promotion. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174:217–228. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2381-8.
    1. Charlier N, De Fraine B. Game-based learning as a vehicle to teach first aid content: a randomized experiment. J Sch Health. 2013;83:493–499. doi: 10.1111/josh.12057.
    1. Bartfay WJ, Bartfay E. Promoting health in schools through a board game. West J Nurs Res. 1994;16(4):438–446. doi: 10.1177/019394599401600408.
    1. Panphunpho S, Thavichachart N, Kritpet T. Positive effects of Ska game practice on cognitive function among older adults. J Med Assoc Thail. 2013;96:358–364.
    1. Demily C, Cavézian C, Desmurget M, Berquand-Merle M, Chambon V, Franck N. The game of chess enhances cognitive abilities in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2009;107(1):112–113. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.09.024.
    1. Sala G, Gorini A, Pravettoni G. Mathematical problem-solving abilities and chess: an experimental study on young pupils. SAGA Open. 2015;5:1–9.
    1. Sala G, Gobet F. Does chess instruction improve mathematical problem-solving ability?: two experimental studies with an active control group. Learn Behav. 2017;45:414–421. doi: 10.3758/s13420-017-0280-3.
    1. Aciego R, Garcia L, Betancort M. The benefits of chess for the intellectual and social-emotional enrichment in schoolchildren. Span J Psychol. 2012;15:551–559. doi: 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38866.
    1. Aydin M. Examining the impact of chess instruction for the visual impairment on mathematics. Educ Res Rev. 2015;10(7):907–911. doi: 10.5897/ERR2014.1967.
    1. Barrett DC, Fish WW. Our move: using chess to improve math achievement for students who receive special education services. Int J Special Educ. 2011;26:181–193.
    1. Gliga F, Flesner PI. Cognitive benefits of chess training in novice children. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:962–967. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.328.
    1. Hong S, Bart WM. Cognitive effects of chess instruction on students at risk for academic failure. Int J Special Educ. 2007;22(3):89–96.
    1. Scholz M, Niesch H, Steffen O, Ernst B, Markus L, Witruk E, Schwarz H. Impact of chess training on mathematics performance and concentration ability of children with learning disabilities. Int J Special Educ. 2008;23(3):138–148.
    1. Mouton A, Gillet N, Mouton F, Van Kann D, Bruyère O, Cloes M, Buckinx F. Effects of a giant exercising board game intervention on ambulatory physical activity among nursing home residents: a preliminary study. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:847–858. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S134760.
    1. Fernandes SC, Arriaga P, Esteves F. Providing preoperative information for children undergoing surgery: a randomized study testing different types of educational material to reduce children's preoperative worries. Health Educ Res. 2014;29:1058–1076. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu066.
    1. Blasco-Fontecilla H, Gonzalez-Perez M, Garcia-Lopez R, Poza-Cano B, Perez-Moreno MR, de Leon-Ma V, Otero-Perez J. Efficacy of chess training for the treatment of ADHD: a prospective, open label study. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016;9(1):13–21. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.02.003.
    1. Barzegar K, Barzegar S. Chess therapy: a new approach to curing panic attack. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;30:118–119. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.08.019.
    1. Wakutani Y, Kusumi M, Wada K, Kawashima M, Ishizaki K, Mori M, Mori N, Ijiri T, Adachi Y, Ashida Y, Kuno N, Urakumi K, Takeshima T, Nakashima K. Longitudinal changes in the prevalence of dementia in a Japanese rural area. Psychogeriatrics. 2007;7:150–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2007.00203.x.
    1. Sala G, Aksayli ND, Tatlidil KS, Tatsumi T, Gondo Y, Gobet F. Near and fear transfer in cognitive training: a second-order meta-analysis. Collabra Psychol. 2019;5:18. doi: 10.1525/collabra.203.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit