Photoacoustic tomography of blood oxygenation: A mini review

Mucong Li, Yuqi Tang, Junjie Yao, Mucong Li, Yuqi Tang, Junjie Yao

Abstract

Photoacoustic tomography (PAT) is a hybrid imaging modality that combines rich contrast of optical excitation and deep penetration of ultrasound detection. With its unique optical absorption contrast mechanism, PAT is inherently sensitive to the functional and molecular information of biological tissues, and thus has been widely used in preclinical and clinical studies. Among many functional capabilities of PAT, measuring blood oxygenation is arguably one of the most important applications, and has been widely performed in photoacoustic studies of brain functions, tumor hypoxia, wound healing, and cancer therapy. Yet, the complex optical conditions of biological tissues, especially the strong wavelength-dependent optical attenuation, have long hurdled the PAT measurement of blood oxygenation at depths beyond a few millimeters. A variety of PAT methods have been developed to improve the accuracy of blood oxygenation measurement, using novel laser illumination schemes, oxygen-sensitive fluorescent dyes, comprehensive mathematic models, or prior information provided by complementary imaging modalities. These novel methods have made exciting progress, while several challenges remain. This concise review aims to introduce the recent developments in photoacoustic blood oxygenation measurement, compare each method's advantages and limitations, highlight their representative applications, and discuss the remaining challenges for future advances.

Keywords: Blood oxygenation; Inverse problem; Optical attenuation; Optical scattering; Photoacoustic tomography; Spectral unmixing.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Absorption coefficient spectra of endogenous tissue chromophores. HbO2 and HbR, 150 g/L in blood; Water, 80% by volume in tissue; Lipid, 20% by volume in tissue; Melanin, 14.3 g/L in medium human skin. Figure adapted with permission from [30].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
PAT of blood oxygenation using a linear-model. (a) sO2 image of a mouse brain acquired by using LLS spectral fitting. (b) Comparison of sO2 in normal and tumor blood vessels. (c–e) HbO2, HbR and sO2 maps using a 2D skin-tissue layer model and minimum mean square error method. Figures adapted with permissions from [10,46].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Optical absorption coefficients calculated based on acoustic spectra. (a) Theoretical fitting (dashed line) and experimental (solid line) acoustic spectra ratio of oxygenated bovine blood at two wavelengths. (b) The fitting of acoustic spectra ratio in an artery (V1) and a vein (V2) at two wavelengths in a mouse ear. Figures adapted with permission from [39].
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Optical fluence compensation using DOT. (a) Original PA image of a cross-section of a phantom containing three tubes. (b) Fluence-compensated PA image of the same cross-section, showing improved signal consistency. (c) Volume-integrated PA signals of the three tubes. (d) Volume-integrated absorption coefficients of the three tubes after fluence correction. (e) The fluence distribution map measured by DOT. (f) Optical fluence profile at the tube depth, showing significant inhomogeneity along the azimuth direction. Figures adapted with permission from [49].
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
PA signal amplitude as a function of pump-probe delay at four different pO2 levels. pO2 levels 0.4 mmHg (circle), 8.6 mmHg (square), 40 mmHg (triangle), and 153 mmHg (diamond). The PA signal decay rate (up right corner) is also plotted as a function of pO2 (R2 = 0.9914). Figure adapted with permission from [33].
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Absorption saturation of HbR and HbO2. (a–b) PA signal amplitudes as a function of the energy of nanosecond (3 ns) and picosecond (3 ps) pulse excitation. (c) Saturation factors of HbR and HbO2. The saturation factor is defined as the ratio of PA signal amplitude with picosecond and nanosecond excitation. Figures adapted with permission from [57].
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of sO2 estimation using eMSOT and linear spectral fitting method. (a) The image area that eMSOT was applied on hindlimb muscles. (b–d) sO2 estimation using eMSOT, under 100% O2 breathing air (b), 20% O2 breathing air (c), and post mortem (d). (e) sO2 estimation using linear spectral unmixing method post mortem. Scale bar, 1 cm. (f) Estimated sO2 values in a deep tissue area (yellow box in (b)) using eMSOT (blue) and linear unmixing method (red) under different breathing conditions. Figures adapted with permission from [42].

References

    1. Xia J., Yao J., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic tomography: principles and advances. Electromagn. Waves (Camb.) 2014;147:1–22.
    1. Wu D. Contrast agents for photoacoustic and thermoacoustic imaging: a review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15(12):23616–23639.
    1. Strohm E.M., Moore M.J., Kolios M.C. Single cell photoacoustic microscopy: a review. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2016;22(3):137–151.
    1. Ntziachristos V., Razansky D. Molecular Imaging in Oncology. Springer; 2013. Optical and opto-acoustic imaging; pp. 133–150.
    1. Ntziachristos V. Going deeper than microscopy: the optical imaging frontier in biology. Nat. Methods. 2010;7(8):603.
    1. Wang L.V. Multiscale photoacoustic microscopy and computed tomography. Nat. Photon. 2009;3(9):503.
    1. Oladipupo S. VEGF is essential for hypoxia-inducible factor-mediated neovascularization but dispensable for endothelial sprouting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108(32):13264–13269.
    1. Oladipupo S.S. Conditional HIF-1 induction produces multistage neovascularization with stage-specific sensitivity to VEGFR inhibitors and myeloid cell independence. Blood. 2011;117(15):4142–4153.
    1. Xia J., Wang L.V. Small-animal whole-body photoacoustic tomography: a review. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2014;61(5):1380–1389.
    1. Li M.-L. Simultaneous molecular and hypoxia imaging of brain tumors in vivo using spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography. Proc. IEEE. 2008;96(3):481–489.
    1. Cui H., Yang X. In vivo imaging and treatment of solid tumor using integrated photoacoustic imaging and high intensity focused ultrasound system. Med. Phys. 2010;37(9):4777–4781.
    1. Li M.L. In-vivo photoacoustic microscopy of nanoshell extravasation from solid tumor vasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14(1)
    1. Liao L.D. Imaging brain hemodynamic changes during rat forepaw electrical stimulation using functional photoacoustic microscopy. Neuroimage. 2010;52(2):562–570.
    1. Nasiriavanaki M. High-resolution photoacoustic tomography of resting-state functional connectivity in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2014;111(1):21–26.
    1. Tsytsarev V. Photoacoustic microscopy of microvascular responses to cortical electrical stimulation. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011;16(7)
    1. Subach F.V. Red fluorescent protein with reversibly photoswitchable absorbance for photochromic FRET. Chem. Biol. 2010;17(7):745–755.
    1. Jiao S. Photoacoustic ophthalmoscopy for in vivo retinal imaging. Opt. Express. 2010;18(4):3967–3972.
    1. Silverman R.H. High-resolution photoacoustic imaging of ocular tissues. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2010;36(5):733–742.
    1. Song L. Ultrasound-array-based real-time photoacoustic microscopy of human pulsatile dynamics in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(2)
    1. Favazza C.P., Cornelius L.A., Wang L.V. In vivo functional photoacoustic microscopy of cutaneous microvasculature in human skin. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011;16(2)
    1. Zhang H.F. In vivo volumetric imaging of subcutaneous microvasculature by photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Express. 2006;14(20):9317–9323.
    1. Yao J. Double-illumination photoacoustic microscopy. Opt. Lett. 2012;37(4):659–661.
    1. Yang J.-M. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2015. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. Catheter-based photoacoustic endoscope for use in the instrument channel of a clinical video endoscope.
    1. Taruttis A. Real-time imaging of cardiovascular dynamics and circulating gold nanorods with multispectral optoacoustic tomography. Opt. Express. 2010;18(19):19592–19602.
    1. Zemp R.J. Realtime photoacoustic microscopy of murine cardiovascular dynamics. Opt. Express. 2008;16(22):18551–18556.
    1. Zhang H.F. Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006;24(7):848–851.
    1. Fang H., Maslov K., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic doppler effect from flowing small light-absorbing particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007;99(18)
    1. Yao J. Label-free oxygen-metabolic photoacoustic microscopy in vivo. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011;16(7)
    1. Beard P. Biomedical photoacoustic imaging. Interface Focus. 2011 rsfs20110028.
    1. Yao J., Wang L.V. Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics. 2014;2(2):87–101.
    1. Yao J., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic tomography: fundamentals, advances and prospects. Contrast Media Mol. Imag. 2011;6(5):332–345.
    1. Harrop G.A. The oxygen and carbon dioxide content of arterial and of venous blood in Normal individuals and in patients with Anemia and heart disease. J. Exp. Med. 1919;30(3):241–257.
    1. Ashkenazi S. Photoacoustic lifetime imaging of dissolved oxygen using methylene blue. J. Biomed. Opt. 2010;15(4)
    1. Wang X. Noninvasive imaging of hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation in the rat brain using high-resolution photoacoustic tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2006;11(2)
    1. Zauner A. Brain oxygenation and energy metabolism: part I-biological function and pathophysiology. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(2):289–301. discussion 302.
    1. Tang J. Wearable 3-D photoacoustic tomography for functional brain imaging in behaving rats. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:25470.
    1. Dale A.M., Halgren E. Spatiotemporal mapping of brain activity by integration of multiple imaging modalities. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001;11(2):202–208.
    1. Wang L.V. Prospects of photoacoustic tomography. Med. Phys. 2008;35(12):5758–5767.
    1. Guo Z., Hu S., Wang L.V. Calibration-free absolute quantification of optical absorption coefficients using acoustic spectra in 3D photoacoustic microscopy of biological tissue. Opt. Lett. 2010;35(12):2067–2069.
    1. Kirchner T., Gröhl J., Maier-Hein L. Context encoding enables machine learning-based quantitative photoacoustics. J. Biomed. Opt. 2018;23(5)
    1. Xia J. Calibration-free quantification of absolute oxygen saturation based on the dynamics of photoacoustic signals. Opt. Lett. 2013;38(15):2800–2803.
    1. Tzoumas S. Eigenspectra optoacoustic tomography achieves quantitative blood oxygenation imaging deep in tissues. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12121.
    1. Daoudi K. Correcting photoacoustic signals for fluence variations using acousto-optic modulation. Opt. Express. 2012;20(13):14117–14129.
    1. Laufer J. In vitro measurements of absolute blood oxygen saturation using pulsed near-infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy: accuracy and resolution. Phys. Med. Biol. 2005;50(18):4409.
    1. Cox B. Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(6)
    1. Kim S. In vivo three-dimensional spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging for monitoring nanoparticle delivery. Biomed. Opt. Express. 2011;2(9):2540–2550.
    1. Laufer J. Quantitative spatially resolved measurement of tissue chromophore concentrations using photoacoustic spectroscopy: application to the measurement of blood oxygenation and haemoglobin concentration. Phys. Med. Biol. 2006;52(1):141.
    1. Guo Z. Quantitative photoacoustic microscopy of optical absorption coefficients from acoustic spectra in the optical diffusive regime. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17(6)
    1. Bauer A.Q. Quantitative photoacoustic imaging: correcting for heterogeneous light fluence distributions using diffuse optical tomography. J. Biomed. Opt. 2011;16(9)
    1. Yin L. Tomographic imaging of absolute optical absorption coefficient in turbid media using combined photoacoustic and diffusing light measurements. Opt. Lett. 2007;32(17):2556–2558.
    1. Glatz J. Blind source unmixing in multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography. Opt. Express. 2011;19(4):3175–3184.
    1. Ntziachristos V., Razansky D. Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) Chem. Rev. 2010;110(5):2783–2794.
    1. Märk J., Schmitt F.-J., Laufer J. Photoacoustic imaging of the excited state lifetime of fluorophores. J. Opt. 2016;18(5)
    1. Forbrich A. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2015. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. Lifetime-weighted photoacoustic imaging.
    1. Shao Q. In vivo photoacoustic lifetime imaging of tumor hypoxia in small animals. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18(7)
    1. Danielli A. Single-wavelength functional photoacoustic microscopy in biological tissue. Opt. Lett. 2011;36(5):769–771.
    1. Yao J. High-speed label-free functional photoacoustic microscopy of mouse brain in action. Nat. Methods. 2015;12(5):407.
    1. Stein E.W., Maslov K.I., Wang L.V. Noninvasive, in vivo imaging of blood-oxygenation dynamics within the mouse brain using photoacoustic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009;14(2)
    1. Li Q. Optics in Health Care and Biomedical Optics VII. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2016. Measuring blood oxygenation of pulsatile arteries using photoacoustic microscopy.
    1. Patwardhan S.V., Culver J.P. Quantitative diffuse optical tomography for small animals using an ultrafast gated image intensifier. J. Biomed. Opt. 2008;13(1)
    1. Hyvarinen A. One-unit contrast functions for independent component analysis: a statistical analysis. Neural networks for Signal processing. VII ProCeedings of the 1997 IEEE Workshop; IEEE; 1997.
    1. Tzoumas S., Ntziachristos V. Spectral unmixing techniques for optoacoustic imaging of tissue pathophysiology. Philos Trans A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2017;375:2107.
    1. Shu W. Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2015. Image registration for limited-view photoacoustic imaging using two linear array transducers.
    1. Huang B. Improving limited-view photoacoustic tomography with an acoustic reflector. J. Biomed. Opt. 2013;18(11)
    1. Wu D. Limited-view photoacoustic tomography utilizing backscatterers as virtual transducers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011;99(24)
    1. Hauptmann A. Model based learning for accelerated, limited-view 3D photoacoustic tomography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2018

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit