Predictive Factors of Conception and the Cumulative Pregnancy Rate in Subfertile Couples Undergoing Timed Intercourse With Ultrasound

So Hyun Ahn, Inha Lee, SiHyun Cho, Hye In Kim, Hye Won Baek, Jae Hoon Lee, Yun Jeong Park, Heeyon Kim, Bo Hyon Yun, Seok Kyo Seo, Joo Hyun Park, Young Sik Choi, Byung Seok Lee, So Hyun Ahn, Inha Lee, SiHyun Cho, Hye In Kim, Hye Won Baek, Jae Hoon Lee, Yun Jeong Park, Heeyon Kim, Bo Hyon Yun, Seok Kyo Seo, Joo Hyun Park, Young Sik Choi, Byung Seok Lee

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine predictive factors for pregnancy and assess the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (CLBR) in subfertile couples undergoing timed intercourse (TI) using ultrasound. This retrospective cohort study included 285 women (854 cycles) who started TI with ultrasound between January 2017 and October 2019. The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 28.1% (80/285) per couple and 9.4% (80/854) per cycle. Pregnant women had a higher body mass index (BMI), higher percentage of irregular menstrual cycles, a shorter duration of subfertility, lower serum follicle-stimulating hormone levels, and higher anti-Müllerian hormone levels than non-pregnant women. A longer duration of subfertility (≥24 months vs. <12 months; odds ratio: 0.193; 95% confidence interval: 0.043-0.859) and endometriosis (vs. ovulatory factors; odds ratio: 0.282; 95% confidence interval: 0.106-0.746) as causes of subfertility were unfavorable factors that independently affected clinical pregnancy. In subgroup analysis, old age ≥ 35 years [vs. < 35 years; odds ratio: 0.279; 95% confidence interval: 0.083-0.938), a longer duration of infertility ≥24 months (vs. <24 months; odds ratio: 0.182; 95% confidence interval: 0.036-0.913) and a higher BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2(vs. >25 kg/m2; odds ratio: 3.202; 95% confidence interval: 1.020-10.046) in couples with ovulatory factor and a longer duration of infertility ≥24 months (vs. <24 months; odds ratio: 0.185; 95% confidence interval: 0.042-0.819) in couples with non-ovulatory factors were significant independent predictive factors for pregnancy. No significant differences were found in the cycle characteristics between pregnant and non-pregnant women. The CPR substantially increased during the first three cycles and significantly increased until the sixth cycle. No significant increase was observed in the CPR after the sixth cycle. The CLBRs substantially increased during the first three cycles and significantly increased until the fourth cycle. No significant increase was observed in the CLBRs after the fifth cycle. When comparing CPRs and CLBRs according to subfertile causes, CRPs was significantly different and CLBRs was different with borderline significance. Our findings may indicate that women with a longer duration of subfertility or subfertility due to endometriosis have poor outcomes during TI with ultrasound. Women who failed to achieve conception by the fourth or fifth cycle of TI with ultrasound may be encouraged to consider advancing to the next treatment strategy.

Keywords: cumulative pregnancy rate; predictive factor; subfertile couples; timed intercourse; ultrasonography.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Copyright © 2021 Ahn, Lee, Cho, Kim, Baek, Lee, Park, Kim, Yun, Seo, Park, Choi and Lee.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Estimated cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates per cycle and trend. CPR, Cumulative pregnancy rate; CLBR, Cumulative live birth rate. aMcNemar’s test: comparing the cumulative pregnancy rate in each cycle with the cumulative pregnancy rate in the previous cycle. bMcNemar’s test: comparing the cumulative total cumulative pregnancy rates and pregnancy rate in each cycle. *The significance level corrected by Bonferroni method is 0.05/11 = 0.0045.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated cumulative pregnancy rate (A) and live birth rate (B) per each cycle and trends according to subfertile causes. CPR, Cumulative pregnancy rate; CLBR, Cumulative live birth rate. *Eight cases of the mild male factor data were combined with the unexplained factor group. **Generalized estimating equation.

References

    1. Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, Chen D, Guang W, French J. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril (2003) 79(3):577–84. 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04694-0
    1. Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod (2003) 18(9):1959–66. 10.1093/humrep/deg366
    1. Thoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R, et al. . Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril (2013) 99(5):1324–31.e1. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037
    1. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. Effects on the probability of conception, survival of the pregnancy, and sex of the baby. N Engl J Med (1995) 333(23):1517–21. 10.1056/nejm199512073332301
    1. Evers JL. Female subfertility. Lancet (2002) 360(9327):151–9. 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)09417-5
    1. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod (2002) 17(5):1399–403. 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1399
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril (2013) 99(1):63–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.023
    1. Agarwal SK, Haney AF. Does recommending timed intercourse really help the infertile couple? Obstet Gynecol (1994) 84(2):307–10.
    1. Severy LJ, Robinson J, Findley-Klein C, McNulty J. Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamics. Contraception (2006) 73(1):65–71. 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.07.008
    1. Pallone SR, Bergus GR. Fertility awareness-based methods: another option for family planning. J Am Board Fam Med (2009) 22(2):147–57. 10.3122/jabfm.2009.02.080038
    1. Bauman JE. Basal body temperature: unreliable method of ovulation detection. Fertil Steril (1981) 36(6):729–33. 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45916-9
    1. Barron ML, Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs (2005) 30(5):290–6. 10.1097/00005721-200509000-00004
    1. Stanford JB, Smith KR, Varner MW. Impact of instruction in the Creighton model fertilitycare system on time to pregnancy in couples of proven fecundity: results of a randomised trial. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol (2014) 28(5):391–9. 10.1111/ppe.12141
    1. Zwingerman R, Chaikof M. Jones C. A Critical Appraisal of Fertility and Menstrual Tracking Apps for the iPhone. J Obstet Gynaecol Can (2020) 42(5):583–90. 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.09.023
    1. Earle S, Marston HR, Hadley R, Banks D. Use of menstruation and fertility app trackers: a scoping review of the evidence. BMJ Sex Reprod Health (2020) 0:1–12. 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200488
    1. Stanford JB, White GL, Hatasaka H. Timing intercourse to achieve pregnancy: current evidence. Obstet Gynecol (2002) 100(6):1333–41. 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02382-7
    1. Miller PB, Soules MR. The usefulness of a urinary LH kit for ovulation prediction during menstrual cycles of normal women. Obstet Gynecol (1996) 87(1):13–7. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00352-5
    1. Lloyd R, Coulam CB. The accuracy of urinary luteinizing hormone testing in predicting ovulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1989) 160(6):1370–2. 10.1016/0002-9378(89)90857-0
    1. Ramezanzadeh F, Nasiri R, Sarafraz Yazdi M, Baghrei M. A randomized trial of ovulation induction with two different doses of Letrozole in women with PCOS. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2011) 284(4):1029–34. 10.1007/s00404-011-1951-5
    1. McGovern PG, Myers ER, Silva S, Coutifaris C, Carson SA, Legro RS, et al. . Absence of secretory endometrium after false-positive home urine luteinizing hormone testing. Fertil Steril (2004) 82(5):1273–7. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.070
    1. Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, Van der Poel S, Matsaseng T, Bernard L, Narasimhan M. Should home-based ovulation predictor kits be offered as an additional approach for fertility management for women and couples desiring pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health (2019) 4(2):e001403. 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001403
    1. Johnson S, Stanford JB, Warren G, Bond S, Bench-Capon S, Zinaman MJ. Increased Likelihood of Pregnancy Using an App-Connected Ovulation Test System: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Womens Health (Larchmt) (2020) 29(1):84–90. 10.1089/jwh.2019.7850
    1. Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Schneider M. Pilot Evaluation of a New Urine Progesterone Test to Confirm Ovulation in Women Using a Fertility Monitor. Front Public Health (2019) 7:184. 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00184
    1. Brown S, Cooke DG, Blackwell LFJOH. Expressing the quantity of urinary analytes: a discussion of some issues arising from the monitoring of the menstrual cycle. Open Health (2020) 1(1):1–20. 10.1515/openhe-2020-0001
    1. Guida M, Tommaselli GA, Palomba S, Pellicano M, Moccia G, Di Carlo C, et al. . Efficacy of methods for determining ovulation in a natural family planning program. Fertil Steril (1999) 72(5):900–4. 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00365-9
    1. Queenan JT, O’Brien GD, Bains LM, Simpson J, Collins WP, Campbell S. Ultrasound scanning of ovaries to detect ovulation in women. Fertil Steril (1980) 34(2):99–105. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)44889-2
    1. Luciano AA, Peluso J, Koch EI, Maier D, Kuslis S, Davison E. Temporal relationship and reliability of the clinical, hormonal, and ultrasonographic indices of ovulation in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol (1990) 75(3 Pt 1):412–6.
    1. Ecochard R, Marret H, Rabilloud M, Bradaï R, Boehringer H, Girotto S, et al. . Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound indices of ovulation in spontaneous cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2000) 91(1):59–64. 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00249-3
    1. Su HW, Yi YC, Wei TY, Chang TC, Cheng CM. Detection of ovulation, a review of currently available methods. Bioeng Transl Med (2017) 2(3):238–46. 10.1002/btm2.10058
    1. Guermandi E, Vegetti W, Bianchi MM, Uglietti A, Ragni G, Crosignani P. Reliability of ovulation tests in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol (2001) 97(1):92–6. 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01083-8
    1. Koo HS, Song IO, Cha SH, Park CW, Kim HO. The likelihood of achieving pregnancy through timed coitus in young infertile women with decreased ovarian reserve. Clin Exp Reprod Med (2018) 45(1):31–7. 10.5653/cerm.2018.45.1.31
    1. Hampton KD, Mazza D, Newton JM. Fertility-awareness knowledge, attitudes, and practices of women seeking fertility assistance. J Adv Nurs (2013) 69(5):1076–84. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06095.x
    1. Soumpasis I, Grace B, Johnson S. Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data. Hum Reprod Open (2020) 2020(2):hoaa011. 10.1093/hropen/hoaa011
    1. Stanford JB, Smith KR, Dunson DB. Vulvar mucus observations and the probability of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol (2003) 101(6):1285–93. 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00358-2
    1. Keulers MJ, Hamilton CJ, Franx A, Evers JL, Bots RS. The length of the fertile window is associated with the chance of spontaneously conceiving an ongoing pregnancy in subfertile couples. Hum Reprod (2007) 22(6):1652–6. 10.1093/humrep/dem051
    1. Balen AH, Morley LC, Misso M, Franks S, Legro RS, Wijeyaratne CN, et al. . The management of anovulatory infertility in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: an analysis of the evidence to support the development of global WHO guidance. Hum Reprod Update (2016) 22(6):687–708. 10.1093/humupd/dmw025
    1. Brown J, Farquhar C. Clomiphene and other antioestrogens for ovulation induction in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2016) 12(12):Cd002249. 10.1002/14651858.CD002249.pub5
    1. Dunselman GAJ, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. . ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod (2014) 29(3):400–12. 10.1093/humrep/det457
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril (2012) 98(3):591–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031
    1. Vercellini P, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Abbiati A, Barbara G, Crosignani PG. Endometriosis: current therapies and new pharmacological developments. Drugs (2009) 69(6):649–75. 10.2165/00003495-200969060-00002
    1. Duffy JM, Arambage K, Correa FJ, Olive D, Farquhar C, Garry R, et al. . Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2014) 4):Cd011031. 10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub2
    1. Frank-Herrmann P, Jacobs C, Jenetzky E, Gnoth C, Pyper C, Baur S, et al. . Natural conception rates in subfertile couples following fertility awareness training. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2017) 295(4):1015–24. 10.1007/s00404-017-4294-z
    1. Eijkemans MJ, Lintsen AM, Hunault CC, Bouwmans CA, Hakkaart L, Braat DD, et al. . Pregnancy chances on an IVF/ICSI waiting list: a national prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod (2008) 23(7):1627–32. 10.1093/humrep/den132
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Removal of myomas in asymptomatic patients to improve fertility and/or reduce miscarriage rate: a guideline. Fertil Steril (2017) 108(3):416–25. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.034
    1. Al Chami A, Saridogan E. Endometrial Polyps and Subfertility. J Obstet Gynaecol India (2017) 67(1):9–14. 10.1007/s13224-016-0929-4
    1. Soave I, Wenger JM, Pluchino N, Marci R. Treatment options and reproductive outcome for adenomyosis-associated infertility. Curr Med Res Opin (2018) 34(5):839–49. 10.1080/03007995.2017.1393404
    1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine . Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertil Steril (2020) 113(2):305–22. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.014
    1. Robinson JE, Wakelin M, Ellis JE. Increased pregnancy rate with use of the Clearblue Easy Fertility Monitor. Fertil Steril (2007) 87(2):329–34. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.054
    1. Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Schneider MM. Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window. Front Med (Lausanne) (2017) 4:250. 10.3389/fmed.2017.00250
    1. Marshell M, Corkill M, Whitty M, Thomas A, Turner J. Stratification of fertility potential according to cervical mucus symptoms: achieving pregnancy in fertile and infertile couples. Hum Fertil (Camb) (2019) 22:1–7. 10.1080/14647273.2019.1671613
    1. Tomlinson MJ, Amissah-Arthur JB, Thompson KA, Kasraie JL, Bentick B. Prognostic indicators for intrauterine insemination (IUI): statistical model for IUI success. Hum Reprod (1996) 11(9):1892–6. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019513
    1. Jeon YE, Jung JA, Kim HY, Seo SK, Cho S, Choi YS, et al. . Predictive factors for pregnancy during the first four intrauterine insemination cycles using gonadotropin. Gynecol Endocrinol (2013) 29(9):834–8. 10.3109/09513590.2013.808324
    1. Evans-Hoeker E, Pritchard DA, Long DL, Herring AH, Stanford JB, Steiner AZ. Cervical mucus monitoring prevalence and associated fecundability in women trying to conceive. Fertil Steril (2013) 100(4):1033–8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.06.002
    1. Thijssen A, Meier A, Panis K, Ombelet W. ‘Fertility Awareness-Based Methods' and subfertility: a systematic review. Facts Views Vis Obgyn (2014) 6(3):113–23. 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.03.010
    1. Stanford JB, Parnell TA, Boyle PC. Outcomes from treatment of infertility with natural procreative technology in an Irish general practice. J Am Board Fam Med (2008) 21(5):375–84. 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.070239
    1. Zinaman MJ, Clegg ED, Brown CC, O’Connor J, Selevan SG. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril (1996) 65(3):503–9. 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)58144-8
    1. Hilgers TW. The Medical Applications of Natural Family Planning: A Contemporary Approach to Women’s Health Care. Omaha, Nebraska: Pope Paul VI Institute Press; (1991).
    1. Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod (2005) 20(5):1144–7. 10.1093/humrep/deh870
    1. Stolwijk AM, Wetzels AM, Braat DD. Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman’s age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. Hum Reprod (2000) 15(1):203–9. 10.1093/humrep/15.1.203
    1. Schröder AK, Katalinic A, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. Reprod BioMed Online (2004) 8(5):600–6. 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61110-8
    1. Guzick DS, Sullivan MW, Adamson GD, Cedars MI, Falk RJ, Peterson EP, et al. . Efficacy of treatment for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril (1998) 70(2):207–13. 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00177-0

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit