Direct formalin fixation induces widespread transcriptomic effects in archival tissue samples

Leah C Wehmas, Susan D Hester, Charles E Wood, Leah C Wehmas, Susan D Hester, Charles E Wood

Abstract

Sequencing technologies now provide unprecedented access to genomic information in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples. However, little is known about artifacts induced during formalin fixation, which could bias results. Here we evaluated global changes in RNA-sequencing profiles between matched frozen and FFPE samples. RNA-sequencing was performed on liver samples collected from mice treated with a reference chemical (phenobarbital) or vehicle control for 7 days. Each sample was divided into four parts: (1) fresh-frozen, (2) direct-fixed in formalin for 18 h, (3) frozen then formalin-fixed, and (4) frozen then ethanol-fixed and paraffin-embedded (n = 6/group/condition). Direct fixation resulted in 2,946 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) vs. fresh-frozen, 98% of which were down-regulated. Freezing prior to formalin fixation had ≥ 95% fewer DEGs vs. direct fixation, indicating that most formalin-derived transcriptional effects in the liver occurred during fixation. This finding was supported by retrospective studies of paired frozen and FFPE samples, which identified consistent enrichment in oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and transcription initiation pathways with direct fixation. Notably, direct formalin fixation in the parent study did not significantly impact response profiles resulting from chemical exposure. These results advance our understanding of FFPE samples as a resource for genomic research.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests. The authors confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Design of experiments to prospectively (Study 1) and retrospectively (Study 2) evaluate formalin effects. PB phenobarbital, DEHP di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate, NBF neutral buffered formalin, FR frozen, FR > OH frozen first then fixed in 70% ethanol prior to paraffin-embedding, FR > FFPE frozen first then fixed in 10% NBF for 18–24 h prior to paraffin-embedding, FFPE directly fixed in 10% NBF for 18–24 h or 3 weeks prior to paraffin-embedding.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Formalin effects on gene expression by RNA-seq. (a) Principal component analysis on scaled, low-expression filtered, counts per million-normalized, log2-transformed gene counts altered by different preservation procedures. ● indicates vehicle control (Con) samples. ▲ indicates phenobarbital (PB)-treated samples. Different colors designate the preservations: frozen control (FR), 70% ethanol-fixed (FR > OH), frozen first then 18-h formalin-fixed (FR > FFPE), and 18-h formalin-fixed (FFPE) liver tissue samples. FR > OH, FR > FFPE, and FFPE samples were all paraffin-embedded. (b) Overlap in significant differentially expressed genes between different preservation groups relative to the paired frozen controls. Significant differentially expressed genes identified by FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05 and fold-change cutoff ± 2 using Partek Flow Gene Specific Analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of formalin fixation on detection of chemical treatment responses. (a) Venn diagram showing overlap in significant phenobarbital (PB)-induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs, FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.05, ± twofold-change) across preservation groups: frozen control (FR), 70% ethanol-fixed (FR > OH), frozen first then 18-h formalin-fixed (FR > FFPE), and 18-h formalin-fixed (FFPE) liver tissue samples. FR > OH, FR > FFPE, and FFPE samples were all paraffin-embedded. (b) Expression pattern of top 10 PB-induced differentially expressed genes. Across preservations, FR > OH, FR > FFPE, and FFPE resulted in significant reductions of counts per million (CPM) gene counts for all preservations relative to frozen control (FR). Error bars represent standard error. Significant differences between preservation group compared to frozen were determined by two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction. **p-value = 0.0029, *p-value = 0.01 (c) Significant upstream regulators (Right-Tailed Fisher’s Exact Test, p-value < 0.05) predicted from PB-induced DEG patterns across preservation groups. « indicates CAR, PXR, and PB. (d) Z-scores of upstream regulators matched to significant p-values with positive z-scores predicting activation and negative scores predicting repression of regulator. « indicates CAR, PXR, and PB.

References

    1. Blum FD. formaldehyd (formol) als hartungsmittel. Z. Wiss. Mikrosc. 1893;10:314.
    1. Blum F. Notix uber die anwendung des formaldehyds (formol) als hartungs-und konservierungsmittel. Anat Anz. 1894;9:229.
    1. Blum F. Ueber wesen und wert der formolhartung. Anat Anz. 1896;11:718.
    1. Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, Roller PP. Formaldehyde fixation. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1985;33:845–853. doi: 10.1177/33.8.3894502.
    1. Li MH, Fu SB, Xiao HS. Genome-wide analysis of microRNA and mRNA expression signatures in cancer. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2015;36:1200–1211. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.67.
    1. Dienstmann R, Rodon J, Barretina J, Tabernero J. Genomic medicine frontier in human solid tumors: prospects and challenges. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:1874–1884. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2268.
    1. Simbolo M, et al. Multigene mutational profiling of cholangiocarcinomas identifies actionable molecular subgroups. Oncotarget. 2014;5:2839–2852. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1943.
    1. Webster AF, et al. Mining the archives: a cross-platform analysis of gene expression profiles in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. Toxicol. Sci. 2015;148:460–472. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv195.
    1. Hester SD, et al. Dose-response analysis of RNA-seq profiles in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Toxicol. Sci. 2016;154:202–213. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw161.
    1. Prat A, et al. Genomic analyses across six cancer types identify basal-like breast cancer as a unique molecular entity. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:3544. doi: 10.1038/srep03544.
    1. Yujin H, et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7385–7392. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1089.
    1. Schmidt M, et al. A comprehensive analysis of human gene expression profiles identifies stromal immunoglobulin k C as a compatible prognostic marker in human solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:2695–2703. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2210.
    1. Sills R, et al. NTP/NIEHS global contributions to toxicologic pathology. Toxicol Pathol. 2017;45:1035–1038. doi: 10.1177/0192623317740326.
    1. Graw S, et al. Robust gene expression and mutation analyses of RNA-sequencing of formalin-fixed diagnostic tumor samples. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:12335. doi: 10.1038/srep12335.
    1. Einaga N, et al. Assessment of the quality of DNA from various formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues and the use of this DNA for next-generation sequencing (NGS) with no artifactual mutation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0176280. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176280.
    1. Burgos-Barragan G, et al. Mammals divert endogenous genotoxic formaldehyde into one-carbon metabolism. Nature. 2017;548:549–554. doi: 10.1038/nature23481.
    1. Jones W, et al. Deleterious effects of formalin-fixation and delays to fixation on RNA and miRNA-Seq profiles. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:6980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43282-8.
    1. Srinivasan M, Sedmak D, Jewell S. Effect of fixatives and tissue processing on the content and integrity of nucleic acids. Am. J. Path. 2002;161:1961–1971. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64472-0.
    1. Kiernan JA. Formaldehyde, formalin, paraformaldehyde and glutaraldehyde: What they are and what they do. Microscopy Today. 2000;1:8–12. doi: 10.1017/S1551929500057060.
    1. Wehmas LC, et al. Demodifying RNA for transcriptomic analyses of archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Toxicol. Sci. 2018;162:535–547. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx278.
    1. Yeakley JM, et al. A trichostatin A expression signature identified by TempO-Seq targeted whole transcriptome profiling. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178302.
    1. Bass, B.P., Engel, K.B., Greytak, S.R. & Moore. H.M. A review of preanalytical factors affecting molecular, protein, and morphological analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue: how well do you know your FFPE specimen? Archiv Pathol Lab Med. 138, 1520–1530 (2014).
    1. Godfrey TE, et al. Quantitative mRNA expression analysis from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues using 5′ nuclease quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction. J. Mol. Diagn. 2000;2:84–91. doi: 10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60621-6.
    1. Lake AD, et al. Dose and effect thresholds for early key events in a PPARa-mediated mode of action. Toxicol Sci. 2016;149:312–325. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv236.
    1. Geter DR, Bhat VS, Gollapudi BB, Sura R, Hester SD. Dose-response modeling of early molecular and cellular key events in the CAR-mediated hepatocarcinogenesis pathway. Toxicol Sci. 2014;138:425–445. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu014.
    1. Xing Y, et al. An expectation-maximization algorithm for probalisitic reconstructions of full-lengthisoforms from splice graphs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:315–3160. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl396.
    1. R version 3.5.3 The R foundation for statistical computing platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit) (2019).

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit