Standards in semen examination: publishing reproducible and reliable data based on high-quality methodology

Lars Björndahl, Christopher L R Barratt, David Mortimer, Ashok Agarwal, Robert J Aitken, Juan G Alvarez, Natalie Aneck-Hahn, Stefan Arver, Elisabetta Baldi, Lluís Bassas, Florence Boitrelle, Riana Bornman, Douglas T Carrell, José A Castilla, Gerardo Cerezo Parra, Jerome H Check, Patricia S Cuasnicu, Sally Perreault Darney, Christiaan de Jager, Christopher J De Jonge, Joël R Drevet, Erma Z Drobnis, Stefan S Du Plessis, Michael L Eisenberg, Sandro C Esteves, Evangelini A Evgeni, Alberto Ferlin, Nicolas Garrido, Aleksander Giwercman, Ilse G F Goovaerts, Trine B Haugen, Ralf Henkel, Lars Henningsohn, Marie-Claude Hofmann, James M Hotaling, Piotr Jedrzejczak, Pierre Jouannet, Niels Jørgensen, Jackson C Kirkman Brown, Csilla Krausz, Maciej Kurpisz, Ulrik Kvist, Dolores J Lamb, Hagai Levine, Kate L Loveland, Robert I McLachlan, Ali Mahran, Liana Maree, Sarah Martins da Silva, Michael T Mbizvo, Andreas Meinhardt, Roelof Menkveld, Sharon T Mortimer, Sergey Moskovtsev, Charles H Muller, Maria José Munuce, Monica Muratori, Craig Niederberger, Cristian O'Flaherty, Rafael Oliva, Willem Ombelet, Allan A Pacey, Michael A Palladino, Ranjith Ramasamy, Liliana Ramos, Nathalie Rives, Eduardo Rs Roldan, Susan Rothmann, Denny Sakkas, Andrea Salonia, Maria Cristina Sánchez-Pozo, Rosanna Sapiro, Stefan Schlatt, Peter N Schlegel, Hans-Christian Schuppe, Rupin Shah, Niels E Skakkebæk, Katja Teerds, Igor Toskin, Herman Tournaye, Paul J Turek, Gerhard van der Horst, Monica Vazquez-Levin, Christina Wang, Alex Wetzels, Theodosia Zeginiadou, Armand Zini, Lars Björndahl, Christopher L R Barratt, David Mortimer, Ashok Agarwal, Robert J Aitken, Juan G Alvarez, Natalie Aneck-Hahn, Stefan Arver, Elisabetta Baldi, Lluís Bassas, Florence Boitrelle, Riana Bornman, Douglas T Carrell, José A Castilla, Gerardo Cerezo Parra, Jerome H Check, Patricia S Cuasnicu, Sally Perreault Darney, Christiaan de Jager, Christopher J De Jonge, Joël R Drevet, Erma Z Drobnis, Stefan S Du Plessis, Michael L Eisenberg, Sandro C Esteves, Evangelini A Evgeni, Alberto Ferlin, Nicolas Garrido, Aleksander Giwercman, Ilse G F Goovaerts, Trine B Haugen, Ralf Henkel, Lars Henningsohn, Marie-Claude Hofmann, James M Hotaling, Piotr Jedrzejczak, Pierre Jouannet, Niels Jørgensen, Jackson C Kirkman Brown, Csilla Krausz, Maciej Kurpisz, Ulrik Kvist, Dolores J Lamb, Hagai Levine, Kate L Loveland, Robert I McLachlan, Ali Mahran, Liana Maree, Sarah Martins da Silva, Michael T Mbizvo, Andreas Meinhardt, Roelof Menkveld, Sharon T Mortimer, Sergey Moskovtsev, Charles H Muller, Maria José Munuce, Monica Muratori, Craig Niederberger, Cristian O'Flaherty, Rafael Oliva, Willem Ombelet, Allan A Pacey, Michael A Palladino, Ranjith Ramasamy, Liliana Ramos, Nathalie Rives, Eduardo Rs Roldan, Susan Rothmann, Denny Sakkas, Andrea Salonia, Maria Cristina Sánchez-Pozo, Rosanna Sapiro, Stefan Schlatt, Peter N Schlegel, Hans-Christian Schuppe, Rupin Shah, Niels E Skakkebæk, Katja Teerds, Igor Toskin, Herman Tournaye, Paul J Turek, Gerhard van der Horst, Monica Vazquez-Levin, Christina Wang, Alex Wetzels, Theodosia Zeginiadou, Armand Zini

Abstract

Biomedical science is rapidly developing in terms of more transparency, openness and reproducibility of scientific publications. This is even more important for all studies that are based on results from basic semen examination. Recently two concordant documents have been published: the 6th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, and the International Standard ISO 23162:2021. With these tools, we propose that authors should be instructed to follow these laboratory methods in order to publish studies in peer-reviewed journals, preferable by using a checklist as suggested in an Appendix to this article.

Keywords: andrology; basic semen examination; journal requirements; laboratory training; patient security; quality control; reproducibility; reproductive medicine; science development; standardized laboratory procedures.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

References

    1. Amara SG. Empower with evidence. Science 2022;375:699.
    1. Barratt CL, Björndahl L, Menkveld R, Mortimer D.. ESHRE special interest group for andrology basic semen analysis course: a continued focus on accuracy, quality, efficiency and clinical relevance. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3207–3212.
    1. Begley CG, Ellis LM.. Drug development: raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 2012;483:531–533.
    1. Björndahl L, Barratt CL, Fraser LR, Kvist U, Mortimer D.. ESHRE basic semen analysis courses 1995–1999: immediate beneficial effects of standardized training. Hum Reprod 2002;17:1299–1305.
    1. Björndahl L, Barratt CL, Mortimer D, Jouannet P.. ‘How to count sperm properly’: checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis. Hum Reprod 2016;31:227–232.
    1. Cairo Consensus Workshop. The current status and future of andrology: a consensus report from the Cairo workshop group. Andrology 2020;8:27–52.
    1. Campbell MJ, Lotti F, Baldi E, Schlatt S, Festin MPR, Björndahl L, Toskin I, Barratt CLR.. Distribution of semen examination results 2020—a follow up of data collated for the WHO semen analysis manual 2010. Andrology 2021;9:817–822.
    1. Carrell DT, De Jonge CJ.. The troubling state of the semen analysis. Andrology 2016;4:761–762.
    1. Errington TM, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, Nosek BA.. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. Elife 2021;10:e67995.
    1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 23162:2021 Basic Semen Examination — Specification and Test Methods. Geneva: ISO, 2021.
    1. Macleod M, Collings AM, Graf C, Kiermer V, Mellor D, Swaminathan S, Sweet D, Vinson V.. The MDAR (Materials Design Analysis Reporting) Framework for transparent reporting in the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118:e2103238118.
    1. Nature. Checklists work to improve science. Nature 2018;556:273–274.
    1. Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, Buck S, Chambers CD, Chin G, Christensen G. et al. SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture. Science 2015;348:1422–1425.
    1. NPQIP Collaborative Group. Did a change in Nature journals' editorial policy for life sciences research improve reporting? BMJ Open Sci 2019;3:e000035.
    1. Rodgers P, Collings A.. Reproducibility in Cancer Biology: What have we learned? eLife 2021;10:
    1. Serrano M, Gonzalvo MC, Sanchez-Pozo MC, Clavero A, Fernandez MF, Lopez-Regalado ML, Mozas J, Martinez L, Castilla JA.. Adherence to reporting guidelines in observational studies concerning exposure to persistent organic pollutants and effects on semen parameters. Hum Reprod 2014;29:1122–1133.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
    1. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.
    1. ISO 23162:2021 Basic Semen Examination – Specification and Test Methods. Geneva: International Standards Organization, 2021.
    1. Mortimer D, Barratt CLR, Björndahl L, de Jager C, Jequier AM, Muller CH.. What should it take to describe a substance or product as ‘sperm-safe’. Hum Reprod Update 2013;19Suppl 1:i1–i45.
    1. Sanchez-Pozo MC, Mendiola J, Serrano M, Mozas J, Bjorndahl L, Menkveld R, Lewis SEM, Mortimer D, Jorgensen N, Barratt CLR. et al.; on behalf of the Special Interest Group in Andrology (SIGA) of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Proposal of guidelines for the appraisal of SEMen QUAlity studies (SEMQUA). Hum Reprod 2013;28:10–21.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit